Skip to main content

Automobile Insurance Claims Auditing: A Comprehensive Survey on Handling Awry Datasets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
WITS 2020

Abstract

Fraud is a very costly criminal activity. Insurance companies face the very challenging task of identifying and preventing fraudulent claims. Just like any big problem in recent years, Machine Learning has been heavily applied to fraud detection in both a supervised and non-supervised manner. But, usually supervised models do not perform well in the presence of awry, asymmetrical Datasets. This paper presents a novel approach for auditing claims in automobile insurance. Our data pipeline consists of preprocessing, feature selection, data balancing, and classification. This robust fraud detection model, built upon existing fraud detection research, gives very promising results compared to state of the art in the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FBI annual reports and publications, Insurance fraud, 2016 https://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/insurance-fraud

  2. Stolfo SJ, Prodromidis AL, Tselepis S, Lee W, Fan DW (1997a) JAM: Java agents for meta-learning over distributed databases. AAAI workshop on AI approaches to fraud detection. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 74–81

    Google Scholar 

  3. Phua C, Alahakoon D, Lee V, Minority report in fraud detection: classification of skewed data. ACMSIGKDD Explore Newslett 6(1):50–59

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pinquet J, Ayuso M, Guillen M (2007) Selection bias and auditing policies for insurance claims. J Risk Insur 74:425–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nian K, Zhang H, Tayal A, Coleman T, Li Y (2016) Auto insurance fraud detection using unsupervised spectral ranking for anomaly. J Finan Data Sci, 58–75

    Google Scholar 

  6. Subudhi S, Panigrahi S (2017) Use of optimized fuzzy C-means clustering and supervised classifiers for automobile insurance fraud detection. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci

    Google Scholar 

  7. Polikar R (2006) Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circ Syst Mag 6(3):21–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP (2002) SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res 16:321–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He H, Bai Y, Garcia EA, Li S (2008) ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning. In: IEEE international joint conference on neural networks (IEEE world congress on computational intelligence), pp 1322–1328

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barua S, Islam MM, Yao X, Kazuyuki (2014) MWMOTE-majority weighted oversampling technique for imbalanced dataset learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(2)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Han H, Wen-Yuan W, Bing-Huan M (2005) Borderline-SMOTE: a new over-sampling method in imbalanced data sets learning. Adv Intell Comput, 878–887

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen HM, Cooper EW, Kamei K (2009) Borderline over-sampling for imbalanced data classification. Int J Knowl Eng Soft Data Paradig 3(1):4–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laurikkala J (2001) Improving identification of difficult small classes by balancing class distribution. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Mani I, Zhang I (2003) kNN approach to unbalanced data distributions: a case study involving information extraction. In: Proceedings of workshop on learning from imbalanced datasets

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tomek I (2010) Two modifications of CNN. Syst Man Cybern IEEE Trans 6:769–772

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson D (1972) AsymptoticProperties of nearest neighbor rules using edited data. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2(3):408–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tomek I (1976) An Experiment with the edited nearest-neighbor rule. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 6(6):448–452

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith D, Michael R, Martinez T, Christophe G-C (2014) An instance level analysis of data complexity. Mach Learn 95(2):225–256

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kubat M, Matwin S (1997) Addressing the curse of imbalanced training sets: one-sided selection. ICML 97:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jin X, Xu A, Bie R, Guo P (2006) Machine learning techniques and chi-square feature selection for cancer classification using SAGE gene expression profiles. In : BioDM’06: proceedings of the 2006 international conference on data mining for biomedical applications, April 2006, pp 106–115

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S, Vapnik V (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach Learn 46(1–3):389–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baranauskas JA, Netto OP (2017) A tree-based algorithm for attribute selection, Sérgio Ricardo Nozawa & Alessandra Alaniz Macedo

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deng H, Runger G (2012) Feature selection via regularized trees. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sundarkumar GG, Ravi V, Siddeshwar V (2015) One-class support vector machine based undersampling: application to churn prediction and insurance fraud detection. In : IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and computing research (ICCIC)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Padhi S, Panigrahi S (2019) Use of data mining techniques for data balancing and fraud detection in automobile insurance claims. In: Bhateja V et al (eds) Intelligent computing and communication, advances in intelligent systems and computing 1034. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., page 221

    Google Scholar 

  26. Farquad MAH, RaviS V, Bapi Raju (2010) Support vector regression based hybrid rule extraction methods for forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.055

  27. Xu W, Wang S, Zhang D, Yang B (2011) Random rough subspace based neural network ensemble for insurance fraud detection. In Fourth international joint conference on computational science and optimization. IEEE, pp 1276–1280

    Google Scholar 

  28. Subelj L, Furlan S, Bajec M, An expert system for detecting automobile insurance fraud using social network analysis

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tao H, Zhixin L, Xiaodong S (2012) Insurance fraud identification research based on fuzzy support vector machine with dual membership. In: 2012 international conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sundarkumar GG, Ravi V (2015) A novel hybrid undersampling method for mining unbalanced datasets in banking and insurance. In: Engineering applications of artificial intelligence

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tian X, Insurance fraud detection: an exploratory data mining approach. In: Southwest decision sciences institute 48th annual meeting

    Google Scholar 

  32. Itri B, Mohamed Y, Mohammed Q, Bouattane Q (2019) Performance comparative study of machine learning algorithms for automobile insurance fraud detection. In: Conference: 2019 third international conference on intelligent computing in data sciences (ICDS)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezzaim Soufiane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Soufiane, E., EL Baghdadi, SE., Berrahou, A., Mesbah, A., Berbia, H. (2022). Automobile Insurance Claims Auditing: A Comprehensive Survey on Handling Awry Datasets. In: Bennani, S., Lakhrissi, Y., Khaissidi, G., Mansouri, A., Khamlichi, Y. (eds) WITS 2020. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 745. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6893-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6893-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6892-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6893-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics