Skip to main content

The Potential of Eco-Facturing: Towards Social and Environmental Justice Through Vocational Education and Training

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Polarisation to Multispecies Relationships

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

Abstract

The paper proposes an alternative cyclical economy based on eco-villages supporting urban hubs to re-generate rural-urban balance based on eco-facturing, to use Gunter Pauli’s concept. Africa and Asia are two of the fastest urbanising areas globally. The development of eco-villages supporting the ‘one village many enterprises’ concept currently applied in Indonesia relies on responsive design. The development of eco-facturing using local products such as cassava for bioplastics, bamboo for biochar and fair trade, free range Luwak coffee and honey production are discussed as examples of eco-facturing that are currently being developed in Indonesia. The potential for eco-facturing to be applied in Southern Africa and Ghana is currently being explored using bamboo and cassava in appropriate areas and exploring a suitable cash crop. Coffee is one option, but many others such as red bush tea, aloes as well as a host of local herbs could be explored with Indigenous holders of wisdom. Core design principles, namely salience, trust and engagement to protect living systems and the people who are affected need to underpin the decision-making process. These principles are discussed in the paper together with the importance of ‘being the change’ through expanding pragmatism to consider the social, economic and environmental implications of choices. Systemic Ethical decisions honour ‘freedom and diversity’ to the extent that freedom and diversity are not undermined by power imbalances.

A version of this paper was presented at International Systems Sciences, Corvallis in 2019 by the first author who conceptualised and wrote the paper. Ida Wirawan set up and facilitated these interviews in West Java as the key facilitator of the COP, Yvonne Corcoran-Nantes participated in interviews whilst Rudolf Wirawan has contributed to the software design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.news24.com/Analysis/thabi-leoka-the-biggest-casualty-in-the-war-against-the-virus-will-be-the-economy-20200507.

  2. 2.

    Action on the Bee Crisis: Paul Stamets, 7 March 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZPkCozuqM8&feature=youtu.be.

  3. 3.

    Paul Stamets. https://youtu.be/XI5frPV58tY6 ways mushrooms can save the world | Paul Stamets he talks about the sentience of mushrooms and that mycelium are the first network or internet. See also Mushrooms, Mycology of Consciousness—Paul Stamets, EcoFarm Conference Keynote 2017.

  4. 4.

    Ulrich, W., and Reynolds, M. (2010). In: Reynolds, Martin and Holwell, S., eds. Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide. London: Springer, pp. 242–292.

    UN. (2007). Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf.

    United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2017). http://www.preventionweb.net/files/55465_globalplatform2017edings.pdf.

    United Nations Paris Climate Change 2015 Conference of the Parties Twenty-first session Paris, 30 November to 11 December 2015. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf.

    United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. (2017). https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/sdg-report-2017.html.

    United Nations. (2014). World Urbanisation Prospects: The 2014 Revisionhttps://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.Pdf.

    United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015–2030). Sendai Framework http://www.preventionweb.net/drr-framework/sendai-framework/.

    United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2017). http://www.preventionweb.net/files/55465_globalplatform2017edings.pdfsendai-framework/.

    United Nations Research Institute for Sustainable Dev. (2017). ‘Beyond the nation state how can regional social policy contribute to achieving the sustainable development goals?’ www.unrisd.org/ib5.

  5. 5.

    http://thecodedoc.com/en/home/.

  6. 6.

    West Churchman summed up CSH by saying there is no such thing as a total system, and that the systems approach begins when first we try to see the world through the eyes of another and that systems thinking is a good idea as long as we do not assume that we have all the answers. He stresses that our values filter the way we see the world and that we are part of the system we are studying. Reynolds (2008) ‘System of systems thinking’ elegantly sums up the 3 elements: (A) Framework for understanding complex interrelationships, (B) Framework for practice when engaging with different perspectives, and (C) Framework for responsibility taking into account A and B.

  7. 7.

    McIntyre-Mills, J. (2017). Planetary Passport: Re-presentation, Accountability and Re-Generation. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland. eBook ISBN, 978-3-319-58011-1, 10.1007/978-3-319-58011-1.

    McIntyre-Mills, J. (2014). Systemic Ethics and non-anthropocentric stewardship. Springer, New York, 270pp. http://www.sense.nl/gfx_content/documents/20161115_Uitgevers.xlsx.

    McIntyre-Mills, J. with De Vries, and Binchai, N. (2014). Transformation From Wall Street to Wellbeing: Joining Up the Dots Through Participatory Democracy and Governance to Mitigate the Causes and Adapt to the Effects of Climate Change. Springer, New York, 253. Springer, ranked B. Second and third authors provided the appendix on software user guide (pp. 193–198).

    McIntyre-Mills, J. (2018). Recognizing our hybridity and interconnectedness: Implications for social and environmental justice. Current Sociology, 66(6), 886–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117715898.

    Rayner, A. (2010). Inclusionality and sustainability—Attuning with the currency of natural energy flow and how this contrasts with abstract economic rationality. Environmental Economics, 1(1), 98–108.

    Stephens, A., Taket, A., and Gagliano, M. (2019). Ecological Justice for Nature in Critical Systems Thinking. Syst. Res, 36, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2532. Stokols, D. (2018). Social ecology in the digital age: Solving Complex Problems in a Globalized World. Academic Press, London.

  8. 8.

    The volumes give examples of hopeful case studies of ways to do things differently. The majority of the case studies are from Australia, Indonesia, Bangladesh and Africa. The rationale for this choice is that rapid urbanisation and the impact on human security pose a challenge for Australia and additional case studies cover issues of displacement and loss of habitat in other regions.

  9. 9.

    Measures will need to be taken to accommodate the education and training needs of current and future generations in ways that encourage better rural-urban balance.

  10. 10.

    The paper draws on two volumes (summarised below) that go beyond critique to offer small case studies and pilots as alternative ways of doing, being and interacting. The volumes are based on papers presented at a multisite symposium as well as additional papers by authors with whom I collaborate.

  11. 11.

    07/15/2011 “I am always trying to figure out how to explain the idea of the commons to newcomers who find it hard to grasp. In preparation for a talk that I gave at the Caux Forum for Human Security, near Montreux, Switzerland, I came up with a fairly short overview, which I have copied below…: http://www.bollier.org/commons-short-and-sweet”.

  12. 12.

    The One Village One Product has been adopted in Indonesia by President Jakowi based on an adapted version of the Japanese model.

  13. 13.

    As stressed in a previous chapter, in the Cape Town context, the issue is exacerbated by the number of young people who are affected by gang violence through being forced to join gangs or being the subject of gang violence. Fighting for the right to ‘own turf’ to sell drugs and manage associated prostitution rings has resulted in vigilante responses by residents who want to regain control of their communities. Large city populations become unstable when living costs are unaffordable. It is not surprising that the so-called Arab Spring started as a result of rising food costs. In Solo, Indonesia riots occurred when living costs and cooking oil become too expensive for the small street traders to survive. The demographic dividend namely high population growth and the rising number of young people could become the trigger for political unrest in rapidly urbanising cities in both Africa and Indonesia where the rising levels of unemployment and poverty result in the vulnerability of women and children to crime and trafficking. The need to link positive vocational training with positive digital engagement through social, economic and environmental pathways to wellbeing is very important for human security. Training in ‘joining up the social, economic and environmental dots’ could be facilitated by the pathways to wellbeing software.

  14. 14.

    Although the number of witchcraft accusations decreased according to this report in the 1960s, there has been a resurgence in Africa in recent years (Cimric, 2010). The notion that the family support extends beyond the boundaries of death is complacent in Africa. When people experience misfortune, the Xhosa describe the process as being ‘intwaso’ or called by the ancestors who speak to them through dreams and through a state of possession. The state of vulnerability is addressed by family who call upon indigenous healers or apostolic or Zionist healers. At best, it leads to re-integration into a community. At worst, it leads to labelling and violence. The Comaroffs (1999) have stressed that the shattering of hope can lead to possession states and when communities are facing high levels of conflict, the blame is placed on scapegoats.

  15. 15.

    The critical systemic approach takes into account many diverse ways of seeing and tries to find common themes that could underpin ‘lives worth living’, based on testing out ideas with those who are to be affected by the decisions and mindful of future generations of life (including sentient beings). This is a form of expanded pragmatism based on mindful decision making in the interests of living systems of which we are a strand (McIntyre-Mills, 2017c).We need to respond to systemic socio-demographic, cultural, political, economic and environmental challenges and the different needs of age cohorts in developed and developing and less developed parts of the world. Harper (2016) stresses that population change is below replacement levels in many parts of Europe where the population profile is one of low fertility and low mortality. So, population change needs to be viewed in terms of ballooning and shrinking populations. Added to this the life chances of young people need to be understood in different parts of the world. Basic concepts include, wellbeing, democracy, subsidiarity, capacity building, critical systemic praxis and wicked problems, complex decisions need to be made by complex decision makers. Others are: cultural studies, critical systems thinking, Informatics and modelling complex systems, sociology and public policy, management systems and governance.

  16. 16.

    The engagement processes (see ‘Balancing Individualism and Collectivism’, McIntyre-Mills et al. 2018) that enable protecting the commons are explored in the companion volumes in which the rationale for a new way of living is developed with participants in Africa and Indonesia, where risks associated with displacement and loss are explored in more depth. The rationale for a more ethical form of representation and accountability to support cosmopolitan transdisciplinary approach is detailed in Systemic Ethics (McIntyre-Mills, 2014). Then in ‘Planetary Passport for Re-generation: Knowing Our Place Through Recognizing Our Hybridity’ (McIntyre-Mills, 2017c) a case is made that the commons could be protected through working across conceptual and spatial boundaries to enable low carbon, virtuous living in which resources are saved, re-generated to protect current and future generations of living systems.

  17. 17.

    Participants included leadership by Ken Bausch, Tom Flanagan with participation by several colleagues including Norma Romm, Gayle Underwood. Leadership has continued through Peter Jones (2020) who sums up the seven axioms:

    1. 1.

      “The Complexity Axiom: Observational variety must be respected when engaging observers/stakeholders in dialogue, while making sure that their cognitive limitations are not violated in our effort to strive for comprehensiveness (John Warfield).

    2. 2.

      The Engagement Axiom: Designing complex social systems, such as for healthcare, education, cities, and communities, without the authentic engagement of the stakeholders is unethical and results in inferior plans that are not implementable (Hasan Özbekhan).

    3. 3.

      The Investment Axiom: Stakeholders engaged in designing their own social systems must make personal investments of trust, committed faith, or sincere hope, in order to be effective in discovering shared understanding and collaborative solutions (Tom Flanagan).

    4. 4.

      The Logic Axiom: Appreciation of distinctions and complementarities among inductive, abductive, deductive, and retroductive logics is essential for collective futures creation. Retroductive logic (referred to in design as backcasting) makes provision for leaps of imagination as part of value- and emotion-laden inquiries by a variety of stakeholders (Norma Romm, Maria Kakoulaki).” Contributions by McIntyre in the following publications (McIntyre-Mills, 2003, McIntyre-Mills, J., Bausch, K, Christakis, A. and de Vries, D. 2008, ‘How can we break the mould: democracy, semiotics and regional governance beyond the nation state’

    5. 5.

      The Epistemological Axiom: A comprehensive human science should inquire about human life in its totality of thinking, wanting, telling, and feeling, as indigenous people and the ancient Athenians were capable of doing. It should not be dominated by the traditional Western epistemology that reduced science to only intellectual dimensions (LaDonna Harris and Reynaldo Trevino).” Contributions by McIntyre in the following publications McIntyre-Mills (2008c, 2017c), User centric policy design, McIntyre-Mills et al. (2014).

    6. 6.

      The Boundary-Spanning Axiom: A science of dialogue empowers stakeholders to act beyond imposed boundaries in designing social systems that enable people from all walks of life to bond …: Contributions by McIntyre in the following publications, McIntyre-Mills (2008a, 2008b).

    7. 7.

      A tradition within the community of practice is to identify the original contributor of the proposal by name, without reference to a specific work but by affirmation. Contexts of Co-creation: Designing with System Stakeholders 32 disciplinary barriers and boundaries, as part of an enrichment of their repertoires for seeing, feeling, and acting (Loanna Tsivacou and Norma Romm).” Contributions by McIntyre in the following publications McIntyre-Mills, 2008c).

    8. 8.

      The Reconciliation of Power Axiom: Social systems design aims to reconcile individual and institutional power relations that are persistent and embedded in every group of stakeholders and their concerns, by honouring requisite variety of distinctions and perspectives as manifested in the Arena (Peter Jones)”.

  18. 18.

    The area of concern which a proposed ‘Global Covenant’ (Held, 2004) and proposed Planetary Passport needs to address is poverty, climate change, displacement of people and destruction of habitat. The PP could strive to balance individual and collective needs in line with a Global Covenant. Post national regions could be protected in the form of a nested governance system spanning the local personal level to the household, community, regional and post national regional level. This could (perhaps) be achieved based on co-creating pathways (McIntyre-Mills & De Vries, 2011; McIntyre-Mills & Wirawan, 2017) to map and manage local resource systems (Ostrom, 2008) in context ‘from below’ based on self-reflection (through critical heuristics questions) to prompt decision making (Jackson, 2000). Stiglitz et al.’s (2010) wellbeing stocks could be supported by enabling people to ‘be the change’ on a daily basis through the way they choose to live their lives and making social contracts through the on-line engagement process. See the demonstration of the pathways to wellbeing software at https://archive.org/download/pathway_DEMO_1 pathways to wellbeing https://archive.org/details/VN860546 ethics and design. The decisions are prompted by scenario guidelines. The daily living choices can be guided by means of an on-line engagement tool that helps decision making and enables the monitoring of social, economic and environmental choices. Positive and negative sanctions through monitoring could ensure that resources are fed forward to those in need and in the interests of future generations.

  19. 19.

    Waughray, D. (2017). Water, energy-food: can leaders at Davos solve this global conundrum? Huge demands for water present complicated challenges, but leaders will not resolve these kinds of interconnected risks without a systems approach https://www.theguardian.com/profile/dominic-waughray.

    https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/jan/16/water-energy-food-challenge-davos.

  20. 20.

    https://www.speakersassociates.com/speaker/gunter-pauli. Accessed 20/12/2016.

  21. 21.

    https://biomimicry.org/what-is-biomimicry-3/. According to the biomimicry institute website: “Biomimicry is an approach to innovation that seeks sustainable solutions to human challenges by emulating nature’s time-tested patterns and strategies. … The core idea is that nature has already solved many of the problems we are grappling with. … After billions of years of research and development, failures are fossils, and what surrounds us is the secret to survival”. Accessed 29/07/2020.

References and Bibliography

  • Aarhus Convention. (1998, June 25). On access to information. Public participation and access to justice in environmental matters, Denmark. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/aarhus/.

  • Al-Saqaf, W., & Seidler, N. (2017). Blockchain technology for social impact: Opportunities and challenges ahead. Journal of Cyber Policy,2(3), 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2017.1400084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. (2006). Living systems theory and social entropy theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science,22, 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. London: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. (2000). Guided evolution of society: A systems view. London: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausch, K. (2000). The practice and ethics of design. Systems Research and Behavioral Science,17(1), 23–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausch, K. (2001). The emerging consensus in social system theory. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausch, K., Flanagan, T., McIntyre-Mills, J., Made, T., Mackenzie, K., Morse, C., & Underwood, G. (2012). Striving for sustainable global democracy through a group decision-making process: A critical review of an online course to model transformative praxis. Journal of Globalization Studies. https://www.sociostudies.org/journal/jogs/. Accessed 27 Feb 2019. Q3 Strategy and Management, Scimago.

  • Beer, S. (1994). Governance or government. Beyond dispute: The invention of team syntegrity. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, R. (1989). Deleuze and guattari. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2012). The commons strategies group. MA: Levellers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. (2011). Existential risk prevention as the most important task for humanity. www.existential-risk.org.

  • Boulding, K. (1956). General systems theory—The skeleton of science. Management Science,2, 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2018, June 25). A theoretical framework for critical post humanities. Theory, Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486, pp. 1–31. Aarhus Convention. (1998). On access to information. Public participation and access to justice in environmental matters, Denmark. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/aarhus/.

  • Christakis, A. N. (1973). A new policy science paradigm. Futures,5(6), 543–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A. N. (1988). The club of Rome revisited in: General systems. In W. J. Reckmeyer (Ed.), International society for the systems sciences (Vol. XXXI, pp. 35–38). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A. (2006). A retrospective structural inquiry into the predicament of humankind: Prospectus of the club of Rome. In J. McIntyre-Mills (Ed.), Rescuing the enlightenment from itself: Critical and systemic implications of democracy, Volume 1 of the ‘C. West Churchman and Related Works Series’. Van Gigch, J. (series editor). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A. N. (2011). Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans (D. S. Massey, Eds.). Boston, MA and Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, and approved October 18, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A., & Bausch, K. (2006). How people harness their collective wisdom and power to construct the future in co-laboratories of democracy. Greenwich: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A. N., & Brahms, S. (2003). Boundary-spanning dialogue for 21st-Century Agoras. Systems Research and Behavioral Sciences,20, 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A. N., & Dye, K. (2008). The Cogniscope:™ Lessons learned in the arena. In P. Jenlink (Ed.), Dialogue as a collective means of design conversation (pp. 187–203). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A. N., & Flanagan, T. R. (2011). Referential transparency for dialogic design science. Technical Report. Institute for 21st Century Agoras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A. N., and Harris, L., (2004). Designing a transnational indigenous leaders interaction in the context of globalization: Wisdom of the people forum. Systems Research and Behavioral Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A., Nicholas, A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives—How your friends’ friends’ friends affect everything you feel, think, and do. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1971). The design of inquiring systems. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1982). Thought and wisdom. Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimric, A. (2010). Children accused of witch craft: An anthropological study of contemporary practices in Africa. Dakar: UNICEF, WCARO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J. J. (1999). Occult economies and the violence of abstraction: Notes from the South African postcolony. American Ethnologist, 26(2), 279–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, F. (2009). The age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. New York: Harmony Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln. (2000). Qualitative handbook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. (2012). Listening: ‘The new democratic deficit’. Political Studies, 60, 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00944.X. See http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00944.x/abstract.

  • Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. (2019). The case for a wellbeing budget to serve people (p. 32). Sydney Morning Herald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T. (2013). Blueprint for a digital observatorium. Montreal, Canada: Worlds Futures Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T., & Bausch, K. (2010). A democratic approach to sustainable futures. Emergence Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T., & Christakis, A. (2010). The talking point: Creating an environment for exploring complex meaning. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T., McIntyre-Mills, J., Made, T., Mackenzie, K., Morse, C., Underwood, G., et al. (2012). A systems approach for engaging groups in global complexity: Capacity building through an online course. Systemic Practice and Action Research,25(2), 171–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R., & Carson, E. (1993). Dealing with complexity: An introduction to the theory and application of systems science, 2nd edn. London: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florini, A. (2003). The coming democracy. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–79. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (Eds.). (1980). Power/knowledge. Harvester: Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence, Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K., Bird Rose, D., & Fincher, R. (2015). Manifesto for living in the anthropocene. New York: Punctum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, R., & Barnes, P. (2018). Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPE). https://www.asp.Ri.org.au/video/surviving-era-disasters, https://www.aspi.org.au/event/surviving-era-disasters.

  • Habermas, J. (2001). The postnational constellation: Political essays. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Cyborgs, simians, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–337). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2010). Speculative fabulations for technoculture’s generations: Taking care of unexpected country. Australian University E press. http://epress.anu.edu.au/guidelines/author_guidelines.html.

  • Harper, S. (2016). How population change will transform our world. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (2004). Global covenant: The social democratic alternative to the Washington Consensus. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, P. (2012). Ecocide, the 5th crime against peace. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EuxYzQ65H4. See the link in this lecture to Stop Ecocide, Change the Law. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCYoIf880oaM419JO8XUhEA.

  • Higgins, P. (2016). Eradicating ecocide: Laws and governance to stop the destruction of the planet. London: Shepheard-Walwyn (Publishers) Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, P. (2018). The 2018 Hague Freedom lecture by Polly Higgins. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQn8oA6e9To.

  • Higgins, P., Short, D. & South, N. (2013) Protecting the planet: a proposal for a law of ecocide. Crime Law Soc Change, 59, 251–266.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9413-6.

  • Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: An archaelogy of the relationships between humans and things. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/session48/pr_181008_P48_spm_en.pdf.

  • http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X13001480.

  • https://www.academia.edu/828363/Accessing_the_eternal_Dreaming_the_dreaming_and_ceremonial_performance.

  • Human Rights Council Advisory Committee on the advancement of the rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas), UN doc. A/HRC/19/75, 24 February 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2010). Bringing them back to life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods (Working paper series 05/10). http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1306/.

  • IPPC report. (2018). Global warming of 1.5 degrees. http://ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/sr15/sr15_spm_final.pdf.

  • Jackson, M. (2000). Systems approaches to management. London: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (2018). Contexts of co-creation: Designing with system stakeholders. In P. Jones & K. Kijima (Eds.), Systemic design: Translational systems sciences (Vol 8). Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. H. (2020). Systemic design: Design for complex social and sociotechnical systems. In G. Metcalf, K. Kijima, & H. Deguchi (Eds.), Handbook of systems science. Springer Japan (in press). https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789811507199#aboutBook.

  • Kabeer, N. (2015). Gender, poverty and inequality: A brief history of feminist contributions in the field of international development. Gender and Development,23(2), 189–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakoulaki, M., & Christakis, A. N. (2017). Demoscopio: The demosensual [R]evolutionary Eutopia. In J. J. McIntyre-Mills, N. R. A. Romm, & Y. Corcoran-Nantes (Eds.), Balancing individualism and collectivism: Social and environmental justice (pp. 387–393). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane J. (2009). The life and death of democracy. London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri, N. (2017). Will blockchain emerge as a tool to break the poverty chain in the Global South? Third World Quarterly,38(8), 1710–1732. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1298438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marella, M. R. (2017). The commons as a legal concept. Law and Critique, 28, 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-016-9193-0.

  • Mbeki, T. (1999). Prologue. In M. W. Makgoba (Ed.), African renaissance (pp. xiii–xxi). Sandton, South Africa: Mafube.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2003). Critical systems praxis: Participatory governance for social and environmental justice. The Contemporary Systems Series. London: Kluwer/Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2004). Facilitating critical systemic praxis (CSP) by means of experiential learning and conceptual tools. Systems Research and Behavioural Science,21, 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2006). Systemic governance and accountability: working and re-working the conceptual and spatial boundaries of international relations and governance. Volume 3: C. West Churchman and Related Works Series, 434 pages. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2007). Participation as a means and an end to support wellbeing in democratic societies: Exploring the conference themes Action Learning. Action Research and Process Management (ALARPM), 12(1), 81–86. ISSN: 1326-964X.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2008a). Part 2: ‘Ethics, identity and politics: reconsidering relationships across self, others, the environment and technology’. Systems Research and Behavioural Science,25(2), 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2008b). Mobius bands and Mandelbrot sets as metaphors for systemic praxis. Systems Research and Behavioural Science,25(2), 323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2008c). User-centric design to meet complex needs, with appendix by De Vries, D. New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2010). Wellbeing, mindfulness and the global commons. Journal of Consciousness Studies,17(7–8), 44–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2014). Systemic ethics and non-anthropocentric stewardship. Springer: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2017a). Planetary passport for representation, accountability and re-generation. Contemporary Systems Series. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2017b). Recognising our hybridity and interconnectedness: Implications for social and environmental justice. Current Sociology. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/journals-permissions.

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2017c). Planetary Passport. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. (2018). Policy design for non-anthropocentric pathways to protect biodiversity and regenerate the land. International Journal of Educational Development in Africa. https://doi.org/10.25159/2312-3540/2865.

  • McIntyre-Mills, J., & De Vries, D. (2011). Identity, democracy and sustainability: Facing up to convergent social, economic and environmental challenges. Litchfield Park: Emergent Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J., & de Vries, D. (2012). Transformation from Wall Street to Well- being. System research and behavioural science. First published online: 10 October 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2133.

  • McIntyre-Mills, J., & Romm, N. (2019). Mixed methods and cross disciplinary research: Towards cultivating eco-systemic living. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J., Corcoran-Nantes, Y., Widianingsih, I., Wirawan, R. (2019). Chapter 7. Alam Endah: Rural camelot in West Java—A case study of empowerment and integrated rural development. In J. McIntyre-Mills, Romm, & Y. Corcoran Nantes (Eds.), Democracy and governance for Rresourcing the commons: Theory and practice on rural-urban balance (pp.179–192). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04891-4, Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04890-7.

  • McIntyre-Mills, J., De Vries, & Binchai, N. (2014). Transformation from Wall Street to Wellbeing: joining up the dots through participatory democracy andgovernance to mitigate the causes and adapt to the effects of climate change. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J., Romm, N., & Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (Eds). (2018). Balancing Individualism and Collectivism: Supporting Social and Environmental Justice.New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J., Corcoran-Nantes, Y., Widianingsih, I., & Wirawan, R. (2019). Chapter 7. Alam Endah: Rural camelot in west java—A case study of empowermentand integrated rural development. In McIntyre-Mills, J., Romm, N. R. A., & Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (Eds.), Democracy and governance for resourcing the commons: Theory and practice on rural–urban balance (pp. 179–192). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04891-4. Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04890-7.

  • McIntyre-Mills, J., & Van Gigch, J. B. (2006). Wisdom, knowledge and management. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J., & Wirawan, R. (2017). Chapter 4: ‘Governing the anthropocene: Through balancing individualism and collectivism as a way to manage our ecological footprint. In J. McIntyre-Mills, N. Romm, & Y. Corcoran-Nantes (Eds.), Balancing individualism and collectivism: Social and environmental justice. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D., & Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the limits: Global collapse of a sustainable future. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, E. (2016, translated, 2019). Animal languages: The secret conversations of the living world John Murray. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M. (2017). Transformative research: Personal and societal. International Journal for Transformative Research, 4(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijtr-2017-0001.

  • Murove, M. F. (1999). The Shona concept of Ukama and the process philosophical concept of relatedness, with special reference to the ethical implications of the contemporary neo-liberal economic practices. Master’s Thesis, University of Natal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. (2018). Three liberal MPs push Morrison to take child refugees and families off Nauru. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/16/three-liberal-mps-push-morrison-to-take-child-refugees-and-families-off-nauru.

  • New Zealand, Public Health Advisory Committee. (2007). An idea whose time has come. https://can.org.nz/system/files/an-idea-whose-time-has-come.pdf.

  • Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. London: The Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuccitelli, D. (2018). New study finds incredibly high carbon pollution costs—Especially for the US and India: As a wealthy, warm country, the US would benefit from implementing a carbon tax to slow global warming. The Guardianhttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/oct/01/new-study-finds-incredibly-high-carbon-pollution-costs-especially-for-the-us-and-india.

  • Ostrom, E. (2008). Design principles of robust property-rights institutions: what have we learned? Elinor Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis Indiana University Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity Arizona State University. http://www.indiana.edu/~workshop.

  • Pauli, G. (2010). The blue economy: Report to the club of Rome. Paradigm Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikketty, T. (2015). 13th Nelson Mandela annual lecture. https://www.nelsonmandela.org/news/entry/transcript-of-nelson-mandela-annual-lecture-2015.

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Foreword by Amartya Sen, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1968). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. New York: Rinehart and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, A. (2017a). The origin of life patterns in the natural inclusion of space in flux. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Natural_Inclusion.

  • Rayner, A. (2017b). Natural inclusion. In J. J. McIntyre-Mills, N. R. A. Romm, & Y. Corcoran-Nantes (Eds.), Balancing individualism and collectivism: Social and environmental justice (pp. 461–470). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. (2008). Response to paper ‘systems thinking’ by D. Cabrera et al.: Systems thinking from a critical systems perspective. Journal of Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(3), 323–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. (2011). Critical thinking and systems thinking: Towards a critical literacy for systems thinking in practice. In C. P. Horvath & J. M. Forte (Eds.), Critical Thinking. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 37–68. https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_inf.

  • Ricke, K., Drouet, L., Caldeira, K., & Tavoni, M. (2018). Country-level social cost of carbon. Nature Climate Change. www.nature.com/natureclimatechange. Published: 24 September 2018. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0282-y.

  • Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems, developments in design methodology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A. (2018). Responsible research practice. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. B. (1992). Dingo makes us human: Life and land in an Aboriginal Australian culture. Cambridge and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. B. (1996). Nourishing terrains: Australian aboriginal views of landscape and wilderness. Canberra, ACT: Australian Heritage Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. B. (2004). Reports from a wild country: Ethics for decolonisation. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. B. (2005). Dislocating the frontier. http://epress.anu.edu.au/dtf/html/frames.php, see http://epress.anu.edu.au.

  • Rose, D. B. (n.d.). Love at the edge of extinction. http://deborahbirdrose.com/links/.

  • Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sesanti, S. (2016, April). African philosophy in pursuit of an African Renaissance for the true liberation of African women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (1989). Staying alive: Women, ecology and survival in India. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2002). Water wars: Privatization, pollution and profit. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2011). Earth democracy. Portland University. www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOfM7QD7-kk/.

  • Shiva, V. (2012a). Making peace with the earth. Winipeg: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2012b). Monocultures of the mind. Penang: Third World Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2020a). Two paths to the future of food and farming - EcoFarm 2020 Keynote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vNPGwqR4TQ.

  • Shiva, V. (2020b). UBC connects with Vandana Shiva: The future of food and farming in a pandemic world. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-0MC4Q3Jyc.

  • Shiva, V. (2020c, March 25). Ecofeminism and the decolonization of women, nature and the future. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVbbov9Rfjg—Uploaded by San Telmo Museoa.

  • Singer, P. (2002). One world: The ethics of globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamets, P. (2017). https://youtu.be/XI5frPV58tY6 ways mushrooms can save the world | Paul Stamets he talks about the sentience of mushrooms and that mycelium are the first network or internet. See also Mushrooms, Mycology of Consciousness—Paul Stamets, EcoFarm Conference Keynote 2017.

  • Stamets, P. (2019). Action on the bee crisis: Paul Stamets, 7 March 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZPkCozuqM8&feature=youtu.be.

  • Stephens, A., Taket, A., & Gagliano, M. (2019). Ecological justice for nature in critical systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. J. (2011). Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105#.

  • Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mis-measuring our lives: Why the GDP doesn’t add up. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D. (2018). Social ecology in the digital age: Solving complex problems in a globalised world. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (2008). http://www.ohchr.org/.

  • Tng, D. (2014). https://davidtng.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/plants-and-people-in-bali-a-quick-glance/.

  • Ulrich, W., and Reynolds, M. (2010). Critical systems heuristics. In M. Reynolds & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide. London: Springer, in association with The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2014). World urbanisation prospects: The 2014 revision. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.Pdf.

  • United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (2007). https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/un-declaration-rights-indigenous-peoples-1.

  • United Nations Paris Climate Change. (2015). Conference of the parties twenty-first session Paris, 30 November to 11 December 2015. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf.

  • Wadsworth, Y. (2010). Building in research and evaluation: Human Inquiry for living systems. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, F. (2002). Planning for country. Alice Springs: IAD Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, L. (1973). Super nature. New York: Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, L. (1976). Gifts of unknown things. Kent: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, J. K. (2015). Lives in connection. In K. Gibson, D. B. Rose, & R. Fincher (Eds.), Manifesto for living in the Anthropocene (pp. 17–22). New York: Punctumbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., et al. (2009). Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. CPsquare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirawan, R., and McIntyre-Mills, J. (2019). Innovation for social and environmental justice: A way forward? In J. McIntyre-Mills, N. R. A. Romm, & Y. Corcoran-Nantes, Democracy and governance for resourcing the commons: Theory and practice on rural–urban balance. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet J. McIntyre-Mills .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McIntyre-Mills, J.J., Corcoran-Nantes, Y., Wirawan, R.J., Widianingsih, I. (2021). The Potential of Eco-Facturing: Towards Social and Environmental Justice Through Vocational Education and Training. In: McIntyre-Mills, J.J., Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (eds) From Polarisation to Multispecies Relationships. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6884-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6884-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6883-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6884-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics