Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 212))

Abstract

The purpose of recommendation systems is to recommend users to the items which they are interested in. Recent studies have mentioned the individual models of recommendation systems, and each of such models uses different measures to predict users’ level of interest in items. In order to improve the efficiency of recommendation systems, we have built a hybrid model to combine such different measures. Then, we experimented the proposed model on the ML-20M-GroupLens dataset, and the obtained results have shown that our hybrid model based on weighted ratings improves up to 8.02 % in precision compared to the user-based collaborative filtering model (the individual model that gave the highest precision results on our experiments).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal, A., Chauhan, M.: Similarity measures used in recommender systems: a study. Int. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. Res. IJETSR, ISSN, 2394–3386 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal, C.C., et al.: Recommender systems, vol. 1. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn, H.J.: A new similarity measure for collaborative filtering to alleviate the new user cold-starting problem. Information Sci. 178(1), 37–51 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alhijawi, B., Kilani, Y.: Using genetic algorithms for measuring the similarity values between users in collaborative filtering recommender systems. In: 2016 IEEE/ACIS 15th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), pp. 1–6, IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cantador, I., Bellogín, A., Vallet, D.: Content-based recommendation in social tagging systems. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pp. 237–240 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghauth, K.I., Abdullah, N.A.: Learning materials recommendation using good learners’ ratings and content-based filtering. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 58(6), 711–727 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kant, V., Bharadwaj, K.K.: Enhancing recommendation quality of content-based filtering through collaborative predictions and fuzzy similarity measures. Proc. Eng. 38, 939–944 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, H.N., El-Saddik, A., Jo, G.S.: Collaborative error-reflected models for cold-start recommender systems. Decis. Support Syst. 51(3), 519–531 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehinevych, T., Kokkinis-Ntrenis, N., Siantikos, G., Dogruöz, A.S., Giannakopoulos, T., Konstantopoulos, S.: Discovering similarities for content-based recommendation and browsing in multimedia collections. In: 2014 Tenth International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems, pp. 237–243, IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, H., Hu, Z., Mian, A., Tian, H., Zhu, X.: A new user similarity model to improve the accuracy of collaborative filtering. Knowledge-Based Syst. 56, 156–166 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahara, T., et al.: A new similarity measure based on mean measure of divergence for collaborative filtering in sparse environment. Proc. Comput. Sci. 89, 450–456 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mao, J., Cui, Z., Zhao, P., Li, X.: An improved similarity measure method in collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm. In: 2013 International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data, pp. 297–303, IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McFee, B., Barrington, L., Lanckriet, G.: Learning content similarity for music recommendation. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Language Process. 20(8), 2207–2218 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patra, B.K., Launonen, R., Ollikainen, V., Nandi, S.: A new similarity measure using Bhattacharyya coefficient for collaborative filtering in sparse data. Knowledge-Based Syst. 82, 163–177 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng, T., Wang, W., Gong, X., Tian, Y., Yang, X., Ma, J.: A graph indexing approach for content-based recommendation system. In: 2010 Second International Conference on Multimedia and Information Technology, vol. 1, pp. 93–97, IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Similarity for news recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the AH’06 Workshop on Recommender Systems and Intelligent User Interfaces. Citeseer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zenebe, A., Norcio, A.F.: Representation, similarity measures and aggregation methods using fuzzy sets for content-based recommender systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160(1), 76–94 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thi-Linh Ho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ho, TL., Le, AC., Vu, DH. (2021). A Hybrid Model for Recommendation Systems. In: Pan, JS., Li, J., Ryu, K.H., Meng, Z., Klasnja-Milicevic, A. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 212. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6757-9_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics