Skip to main content

The Self in Teams

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leading Solutions
  • 882 Accesses

Abstract

Groups that range from two persons to many are a very big part of social life—in all its facets—and most organizations rely on teamwork: the justification is that teams are better at solving problems and learn more rapidly and with more effect than individuals (Serrat, 2009). This précis offers reflections on personal experiences of teamwork, noting what does not work. The précis identifies a meaningful common purpose as the single highest requirement for getting work done but underscores other key ingredients of practice. The précis also notes the importance of integrating team identity for team effectiveness.

The Self in Teams was completed on September 9, 2019.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brewer, M., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. (2010). Leading teams: Imperatives for leaders. In G. Hickman (Ed.), Leading organizations: Perspectives for a new era (pp. 209–238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultman, K., & Hultman, J. (2015). Organizational development as identity change. Organization Development Journal, 33(3), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, J., & Smith, D. (1993). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, J., & Smith, D. (2011). The discipline of teams. In HBR’s 10 must reads: On managing people (pp. 175–194). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lencioni, P. (2002). The five dysfunctions of a team. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. San Francisco, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, W. (2007). The frontline guide to thinking clearly. Amherst, MA: HRD Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrat, O. (2009). Working in teams. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Serrat, O. (2021). The Self in Teams. In: Leading Solutions. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6485-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics