Skip to main content

Comparative Study of Arsenic Removal Using Different Coagulants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Water Resources Management for Sustainable Use

Abstract

Arsenic is one of the toxic elements for human health when it is entered into the human body at a high range for a prolonged time and reported as one of the world’s extreme natural groundwater calamities. Several technologies are used towards the mitigation of arsenic from contaminated groundwater to supply arsenic-free drinking water. However, the main objective of this study is the comparison of different coagulants for efficient removal of arsenic from groundwater using oxidation followed by the chemical coagulation method, which is a conventional and useful technique of water treatment. In this experiment, naturally contaminated water samples were collected from tube wells and bleaching powder solution at different concentrations was added followed by proper mixing so that oxidation of arsenite to arsenate could be achieved. Different level of doses of coagulant such as alum, ferrous sulphate, and ferric chloride was rapidly and slowly mixed and allowed the mixture to settle for 2 h. After the filtration of supernatants, various water quality parameters had been analysed. Depending upon the dosing of oxidizing and coagulating agents the efficiency of arsenic removal varies from 57 to 89%, 61 to 95%, and 67 to 98% for alum, ferrous sulphate, and ferric chloride, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Murcott S (2012) Arsenic contamination in the world. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mondal NS, Basak SK, Roy PK, Majumder A, Mazumdar A (2020) Arsenic removal using electro-coagulation: suitable electrode selection. Environment Asia 13(3):13–25. https://doi.org/10.14456/ea.2020.38

  3. National Research Council (1999) Arsenic in drinking water. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/6444

  4. National Research Council (2001) Arsenic in drinking water: 2001 update. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/10194

  5. Ghosh M, Roy PK, Majumder A (2014) Effect of arsenic rich soil and groundwater on paddy cultivation. World Appl Sci J 29(2):165–170. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.29.02.1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Viraraghavan T, Subramanian KS, Aruldoss JA (1999) Arsenic in drinking water-Problems and solutions. Water Sci Technol 40(2):69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00432-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Song S, Lopez-Valdivieso A, Hernandez-Campos DJ, Peng C, Monroy- Fernandez MG, Razo-Soto I (2006) Arsenic removal from high-arsenic water by enhanced coagulation with ferric ions and coarse calcite. Water Res 40:364–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parga JR, Cocke DL, Valenzuela JL, Gomes JA, Kesmez M, Irwin G, Moreno H, Weir M (2005) Arsenic removal via electrocoagulation from heavy metal contaminated groundwater in La Comarca Lagunera Mexico. J Hazard Mater 124(1–3):247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roy PK, Majumder A, Banerjee G, Roy MB, Pal S, Mazumdar A (2015) Removal of arsenic from drinking water using dual treatment process. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:1065–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0862-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ali MA, Badruzzaman ABM, Jalil MA, Hossain MD, Hussainuzzaman MM, Badruzzaman M, Mohammad OI, Akter N (2001) Development of lowcost technologies for arsenic removal from groundwater. In: Ahmed MF et al (eds) Technologies for arsenic removal from drinking water. A compilation of papers presented at the international workshop on technologies for arsenic removal from drinking water. Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology and The United Nations University, Dhaka, Bangladesh and Tokyo, pp 99–120

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lakshmanan D, Clifford DA, Samanta G (2008) Arsenic removal by coagulation with aluminum, iron, titanium, and zirconium. J Am Water Work Assoc 100(2):76–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2008.tb08144.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed MF (2001) An overview of arsenic removal technologies in Bangladesh and India. In: Ahmed MF et al (eds) Technologies for arsenic removal from drinking water. A compilation of papers presented at the international workshop on technologies for arsenic removal from drinking water. Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology and the United Nations University, Dhaka, Bangladesh and Tokyo, pp 251–269

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hering JG, Chen PY, Wilkie JA, Elimelech M, Liang S (1996) Arsenic removal by ferric chloride. J Am Water Work Assoc 88(4):155–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1996.tb06541.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajeshwar K, Ibanez JG (1997) Environmental electrochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmed MF, Rahaman MM, IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre (2000) Water supply and sanitation: low income urban communities. ITN-Bangladesh, Centre for Water Supply and Waste Management, BUET, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri (eds) (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edition. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the School of Water Resources Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700032, India; all the previous investigators of arsenic and arsenic removal and the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), Government of India (GoI), and the Government of West Bengal for encouraging by giving financial support as scholarship.

Funding Information This research is financially supported by the School of Water Resources Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700032 for experimental work, the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), Government of India (GoI), and the Government of West Bengal as scholarship.

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest or competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nil Sadhan Mondal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mondal, N.S., Roy, P.K., Mazumdar, A., Majumder, A. (2021). Comparative Study of Arsenic Removal Using Different Coagulants. In: Roy, P.K., Roy, M.B., Pal, S. (eds) Advances in Water Resources Management for Sustainable Use. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 131. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6412-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6412-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6411-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6412-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics