Advertisement

Paying a Price to Get a Value: Choose Wisely

Chapter
  • 117 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Rhythm Engineering book series (SRE)

Abstract

Of the traditional marketing mixes that are used to influence consumer purchase decisions, the development of a pricing strategy that retains a loyal customer base without harming profitability remains the most elusive. Advancements in behavioural economics have demonstrated that the economic choices of human beings may not always be necessarily rational. In fact, previous studies have shown that the assumption of rationality is overstated in economic theories. Even under normal circumstances, the consumers tend to confuse price and value, often ending up purchasing high-priced products on the pretext that higher price is associated with a higher value. The inherent elements of irrationality that persist in consumer behaviour offer opportunities for the sellers to develop and apply new heuristics and priming techniques for setting prices that may coax the consumers to make a purchase. Everyone gets influenced by one or another cognitive distortion at some point. On this account, understanding the cognitive biases in consumer decision-making process is key to developing an effective pricing strategy. This chapter gives a detailed account of how well the consumers respond to subtle nuances in price offers and other price-related priming strategies through the lens of behavioural economics.

Keywords

Pain of paying Pricing strategies Consumer behaviour Behavioural economics 

References

  1. Ariely, D. (2003). Why good CIOs make bad decisions. CIO Magazine.Google Scholar
  2. Bernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. In: Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae (Sommer Trans.) (1954).Google Scholar
  3. Bodur, H. O., & Grohmann, B. (2005). Consumer responses to gift receipt in business-to-consumer contexts. Psychology and Marketing, 22(5), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai, F., Bagchi, R., & Gauri, D. K. (2016). Boomerang effects of low price discounts: How low price discounts affect purchase propensity. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 804–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chatterjee, P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). Do payment mechanisms change the way consumers perceive products? Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1129–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, H., Marmorstein, H., Tsiros, M., & Rao, A. R. (2012). When more is less: The impact of base value neglect on consumer preferences for bonus packs over price discounts. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chu, S., & Keh, H. T. (2006). Brand value creation: Analysis of the Interbrand-Business Week brand value rankings. Marketing Letters, 17(4), 323–331.Google Scholar
  8. Feinberg, R. A. (1986). Credit cards as spending facilitating stimuli: A conditioning interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(3), 348–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher, I. (1930). The theory of interest. New York: Macmillan.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99(4), 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. WW Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  13. Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (2005). Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Science, 24(3), 382–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammond, P. J. (1997). Rationality in economics. Rivista Internazionale Di Scienze Sociali, 105(3), 247–288.Google Scholar
  15. Heyman, J., & Ariely, D. (2004). Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psychological Science, 15(11), 787–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsee, C. K., Yu, F., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Medium maximization. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inman, J.J., Winer, R.S., & Ferraro, R. (2009). The interplay among category characteristics. Customer Marketing, 73(5), 19–29.Google Scholar
  18. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 1156–67.Google Scholar
  19. Karmarkar, U. R., Shiv, B., & Knutson, B. (2015). Cost conscious? The neural and behavioral impact of price primacy on decision making. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 467–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keh, H. T., Chu, S., & Xu, J. (2006). Efficiency, effectiveness and productivity of marketing in services. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(1), 265–276.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knutson, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G. E., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53(1), 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knutson, B., Taylor, J., Kaufman, M., Peterson, R., & Glover, G. (2005). Distributed neural representation of expected value. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(19), 4806–4812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kruger, J., & Vargas, P. (2008). Consumer confusion of percent differences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(1), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krzyzanowski, L. (2007). The sceience of spending. https://thetartan.org/2007/1/29/pillbox/shopping. Accessed on March 02, 2020.
  25. Loewenstein, G., Rick, S., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Neuroeconomics. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 647–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lowe, B. (2010). Consumer perceptions of extra free product promotions and discounts: The moderating role of perceived performance risk. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 19(7), 496–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McGraw, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Taboo trade‐offs, relational framing, and the acceptability of exchanges. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 2–15.Google Scholar
  28. Mishra, H., Mishra, A., & Nayakankuppam, D. (2006). Money: A bias for the whole. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montaner, T., De Chernatony, L., & Buil, I. (2011). Consumer response to gift promotions. Journal of Product and Brand Management.Google Scholar
  30. Munger, J. L., & Grewal, D. (2001). The effects of alternative price promotional methods on consumers’ product evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(3), 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nobel, C. (2014). How Our Brain Determines if the Product is Worth the Price. https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/how-our-brain-determines-if-the-product-is-worth-the-price. Accessed on January 28, 2020.
  32. Nunes, J. C., & Park, C. W. (2003). Incommensurate resources: Not just more of the same. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(1), 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pirog, S. F., & Roberts, J. A. (2007). Personality and credit card misuse among college students: The mediating role of impulsiveness. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1), 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1996). The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, pp. 02138.Google Scholar
  35. Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Preston, S. D. (2014). The interdisciplinary science of consumption. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Raghubir, P., & Srivastava, J. (2008). Monopoly money: The effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(3), 213.Google Scholar
  38. Rick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). The role of emotion in economic behavior. Handbook of Emotions, 3, 138–158.Google Scholar
  39. Rick, S. I., Cryder, C. E., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Tightwads and spendthrifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 767–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scott, A. (2006). Try Me! Promo, 19(5). Pennsylvania: Chronicle Newspaper Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Shampanier, K., Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2007). Zero as a special price: The true value of free products. Marketing Science, 26(6), 742–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sinha, I., & Smith, M. F. (2000). Consumers’ perceptions of promotional framing price. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). Rational actors or rational fools: Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 31(4), 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Soman, D. (2001). Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior: The role of rehearsal and immediacy of payments. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 460–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Szmigin, I., & O’Loughlin, D. (2010). Students and the consumer credit market: Towards a social policy agenda. Social Policy and Administration, 44(5), 598–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas, M., Desai, K. K., & Seenivasan, S. (2011). How credit card payments increase unhealthy food purchases: Visceral regulation of vices. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.Google Scholar
  48. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wager, T. D., Atlas, L. Y., Lindquist, M. A., Roy, M., Woo, C. W., & Kross, E. (2013). An fMRI-based neurologic signature of physical pain. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(15), 1388–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zeki, S., Goodenough, O. R., & Zak, P. J. (2004). Neuroeconomics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1737–1748.Google Scholar
  51. Zellermayer, O. (1996). The pain of paying. Unpublished dissertation, Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsCHRIST (Deemed to be University)BangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Saintgits Institute of ManagementKeralaIndia

Personalised recommendations