Skip to main content

The EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement Versus the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Economic Analysis of Korea–EU FTA and Japan–EU EPA
  • 441 Accesses

Abstract

The European Union’s free trade agreement has recently changed to impact a new generation, with a greater emphasis on the European Union’s values. Reflecting this, the free trade agreement between the European Union and Korea became effective in December 2015, with a ‘trade and sustainable development’ chapter. Similarly, the economic partnership agreement between the European Union and Japan has a similar section, but with further detail. The parties in these chapters agreed to reaffirm the importance of free trade and the relationships between free trade and climate, as well as workers’ rights. The European Commission considered the free trade agreement between the European Union and Korea in calling for government consultations on workers’ rights with Korea. While it is still early, the Commission may require similar consultations with Japan. When we observe the recent changes in world trade, protectionist movements are becoming increasingly popular; therefore, it is noteworthy that the economic partnership agreement between the European Union and Japan—which is considered a ‘mega’ free trade agreement—should appealing benefits from such free trades in spite of their value to the European Union.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Woolcock [21].

  2. 2.

    Simon [20].

  3. 3.

    Daniel and Marc [3].

  4. 4.

    European Commission [8].

  5. 5.

    European Commission [11].

  6. 6.

    European Commission [10].

  7. 7.

    European Commission [4].

  8. 8.

    European Parliament [5].

  9. 9.

    European Commission [12].

  10. 10.

    European Commission, op. cit. (7).

  11. 11.

    Official Journal of the European Union [15].

  12. 12.

    European Commission [9].

  13. 13.

    CBC News [1].

  14. 14.

    Cheong [2].

  15. 15.

    Official Journal of the European Union [16].

  16. 16.

    Pardo et al. [18].

  17. 17.

    European Commission [6].

  18. 18.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan [13].

  19. 19.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of One Part and Japan, of the Other Part. https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000381942.pdf, accessed 21 Dec 2019.

  20. 20.

    New Zealand Foreign Affairs and Trade [14].

  21. 21.

    Shujiro Urata [19].

  22. 22.

    Official Journal of the European Union [17].

  23. 23.

    European Commission [7].

References

  1. CBC News. (2016). Walloons Now Say Yes, as Canada-EU Trade Deal Clears Final Votes. Retrieved December 21, 2019, from https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-eu-trade-friday-votes-1.3825583.

  2. Cheong, I. (2014). Korea’s Policy Package for Enhancing its FTA Utilization and Implications for Korea’s Policy. ERIA Discussion Paper Series (ERIA-DP-2014–11).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel, D., & Marc, D. F. (2007). Deadlock in the Doha Round: The Long Decline of Trade Multilateralism. Retrieved December 21, 2019, from https://www.worldtradelaw.net/articles/drachedoha.pdf.download.

  4. European Commission. (2016). EU Negotiating Texts in TTIP. Retrieved December 21, 2019, from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1230.

  5. European Parliament. (2016). TTIP: Access to Consolidated Texts and Confidential Documents. Retrieved December 28, 2019, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/580909/EPRS_BRI(2016)580909_EN.pdf#search=%27NPO+NGO+EU+TTIP%27.

  6. European Commission. (2017). Evaluation of the Implementation of the Free Trade Agreement between the EU and its Member States and the Republic of Korea, p. 88. Retrieved December 21, 2019, from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/june/tradoc_155673.pdf.

  7. European Commission. (2019).EU Team in Korea for Government Consultations over Labour Commitments Under the Trade Agreement. Retrieved December 21, 2019, from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1973&title=EU-team-in-Korea-for-government-consultations-over-labour-commitments-under-the-trade-agreement.

  8. European Commission. (2006). Global Europe: Competing in the World. COM (2006) 567 final, September 4, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. European Commission. (2007). The Opinion of the European Court of Justice on the EU-Singapore Trade Agreement and the Division of Competences in Trade Policy. Retrieved December 21, 2019, from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/september/tradoc_156035.pdf.

  10. European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. COM (2010) 2020 final, March 3, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  11. European Commission. (2010). Trade, Growth and World Affairs: Trade Policy as a Core Component of the EU’s 2020 Strategy. COM (2010) 612 final, November 9, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  12. European Commission. (2015). Trade for All: Towards a More Responsible Trade and Invest-ment Policy. COM (2015) 497 final, September 15, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2018). Agreement between the European union and Japan for an economic partnership. Evaluation of the Implementation of the Free Trade Agreement between the EU and its Member States and the Republic of Korea. Retrieved December 21, 2019, from https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000382106.pdf.

  14. New Zealand Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2016). Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. Retrieved December 21, 2019, from https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/about-us/who-we-are/treaties/trans-pacific-partnership-agreement-tpp/text-of-the-trans-pacific-partnership/.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Official Journal of the European Union. (2007). Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community, 2007/C 306/01.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Official Journal of the European Union. (2011). Council Decision of 16 September 2010 on the signing, on Behalf of the European Union, and Provisional Application of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the One Part, and the Republic of Korea, of the Other Part (2011/265/EU).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Official Journal of the European Union. (2012). Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, C 326. Retrieved October 26, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pardo, R. P., Desmaele, L., & M. Ernst (2018). EU-ROK Relations, Putting the Strategic Partnership to Work. KF-VUB Korea Chair Report, October 2018. Retrieved December 21, 2019, from https://www.ies.be/files/EU-ROK_RELATIONS.pdf.

  19. Shujiro, U. (2016). Mega-FTAs and the WTO: Competing or Complementary?International Economic Journal, 30(2).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simon, J. E. (2005). Competitive Liberalization: A Tournament Theory-Based Interpretation. Retrieved December 24, 2019, from https://www3.nd.edu/~jbergstr/EvenettSept2005.pdf#search=%27competitive+liberalization+Us%27.

  21. Woolcock, S. (2007). European Union Policy Towards Free Trade Agreements. ECIPE Working Paper, No. 03/2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiromasa Kubo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Kobe University

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kubo, H. (2021). The EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement Versus the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement. In: Yoshii, M., Yi, CD. (eds) An Economic Analysis of Korea–EU FTA and Japan–EU EPA. Kobe University Monograph Series in Social Science Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6145-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6145-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6144-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6145-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics