Advertisement

Test Research and Finite Element Analysis on Extension Performance of Civil Aircraft Flaps Subjected to Extreme Temperature

Conference paper
  • 114 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 680)

Abstract

Aircraft climate test was conducted to investigate the effect of extreme temperature on extension performance of civil aircraft flaps in aircraft climate laboratory. Test results show extending the flaps to 10° requires 9.5 s, 7.8 s, 7.6 s when the standard equipped aircraft was kept at −40 ℃, 20 ℃ and 40 ℃ for the stipulated time, respectively. The lower the temperature is, the more difficult it is to extend the flaps. Furthermore, a finite element analysis (FEA) mode of the flap motion mechanism was proposed to reveal the influence of extreme temperature on deformation and drive torque of the flaps. Actual motion law of flap motion mechanism was adopted to describe behavior of flap motion mechanism under extreme temperature. The numerical research shows the drive torque decreases from −0.51 × 104 to −4.52 × 104 N mm when temperature rises from 20 to 74 ℃; conversely the drive torque increases from −0.51 × 104 to 27.5 × 104 N mm when temperature drops from 2 to −55 ℃. In addition, the lower the temperature is, the more obvious the deformation mismatch of the flap mechanism is, which may cause the friction to increase. The increasing friction due to the temperature drop results in the higher drive torque required to extend the flaps, which is also the reason that the time for extending the flaps to 10° increases with the decrease of temperature. The numerical results are observed to mutually agree with the test results mentioned above that the low temperature makes it difficult to extend the flaps.

Keywords

Aircraft climate test Standard equipped aircraft Civil aircraft flaps Finite element analysis Extreme temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support for this work from civil aircraft environmental adaptability research team.

References

  1. 1.
    Heyden T Elastic multibody models of transport aircraft high-lift mechanisms. J Aircraft 46(5):1513–1524Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chunlin G et al (2018) Numerical investigation of the effects of different parameters on the thrust performance of three dimensional flapping wings. Aerospace Sci TechnolGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Song Q (2017) Analysis of flap mechanism reliability. In: International conference on mechatronics engineering & information technologyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Renukumar B et al Effect of flap and slat riggings on 2-D high-lift aerodynamics. J Aircraft. 43(5):1259–1271Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cui L, Lu Z, Hao W Importance analysis of the aircraft flap mechanism movement failure. J Aircraft 48(2):606–611Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pang H et al (2011) Reliability analysis of the flap mechanism with multi-pivots. Inf Japan 15(12)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rehwald S (2007) Analysis of the performance potential of a single aisle transport aircraft with a new high-lift differential flap system. J Ethnic Migration Stud 33(6):1003–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Song B (2011) Reliability analysis of the flap mechanism with multi-pivots. In: International conference on qualityGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang Z (2015) Nonprobabilistic reliability analysis for an inside flap of an aircraft. J Aircraft 49(1):250–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu P (2017) Aerodynamic optimization and mechanism design of flexible variable camber trailing-edge flap. 中国航空学报(英文版) 30(3):988–1003Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang L Reliability analysis of structure and control mechanism of aircraft flap. Comput Struct 38(1):21–24Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Winter E, Woernle C (2013) Multibody modelling of high-lift mechanisms of modern transport aircraft. In: Mechanisms and machine scienceGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yoshida T, Mizusaki Y, Taki T (2004) Analysis and rig test in EMB170 flap mechanism development. In: 24th international congress of the aeronautical sciences (ICAS), pp 1–4Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cui L et al (2009) Dynamic response reliability analysis of airplane inner-flap mechanism. Gaojishu Tongxin/Chin High Technol Lett 19(12):1299–1304Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luo X et al (2020) The feasibility and survival mechanism of a large free flap supported by a novel hybrid perfusion mode. Oral Oncol 101:104506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Song B (2011) Reliability analysis of the flap mechanism with multi-pivots. Inf Japan 15(12)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tang HM et al (2012) Expression of NPY and 5-HT in rat model of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Chin Pharmacol Bull 28(7):916–920Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AVIC Aircraft Strength Research InstituteXi’anChina
  2. 2.Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations