Skip to main content

A Study on Aerodynamic Interference for Truss Braced Wing Configuration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Aerospace System Science and Engineering 2020 (ICASSE 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 680))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1270 Accesses

Abstract

Truss Braced Wing (TBW) is one of the most promising configurations for future single-aisle commercial aircraft. The additional strut and jury in TBW endow the structure with better stiffness and strength, which enables a wing with larger aspect-ratio, thinner thickness and smaller swept angle, and even equipped with laminar flow airfoil. Theoretically, TBW configuration has the advantage of higher lift-to-drag ratio. However, one of potential problems for TBW is that severe disturbance may exist at the junction of truss and wing, which will reduce the aerodynamic benefit of TBW. To deal with this issue, this paper investigates influence of truss geometry on aerodynamic characteristics by numerical simulations of CFD. The Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) method with the S-A turbulence model is used to compute the aerodynamic force and observe flow phenomenon of TBW in flight speed of Mach 0.73. The simulation results show that the geometric parameters that have large impacts on the cross section shape around the junction tend to have greater influences on aerodynamic characteristics (The Cross Section in this paper represents the cross section of air flow tunnel between the wing and truss). To analyze the impact of cross section geometry at the junction on the interference drag, we introduce a specific term, namely ‘flow section compression ratio’ that is the decreased rate of the cross section area from the entrance to the throat. The analysis indicates that the transonic disturbance will be considerable weaken when the ‘flow section compression ratio’ around the junction is under 16%, and the drag due to transonic disturbance accounts for only about 25% of the total interference drag. In order to further decrease the interference drag at the junction, we also investigate influences of the cross section geometry and airfoil thickness at the junction on the profile drag. The results from this paper can be helpful for TBW configuration design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu DF (2010) US’ N+3-generation airliner program into phase 1. Int Aviat. (6):49–51. Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zeng JF, Qu JS (2012) EU aviation carbon tax and its international influences. Clim Change Res 8(4):292–296. Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lu ZF (2014) ICAO-based aviation carbon emission calculation and low-carbon countermeasures. Resour Economization Environ Prot (9):129–130. Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hardman AF (2014) Measures for international aviation to respond to global carbon emissions. China Civ Aviat (6):27–28. Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xu DF (2015) Truss-braced wing shows promise. Int Aviat (2), 79–79. Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bradley KF, Droney KS (2012) Subsonic ultra green aircraft research phase II. NASA/CR-2012-217556

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu ZF (2009) Multi-disciplinary optimization of strut-braced wing transonic transport. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 30(1):1–11. Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gern FF, Ko AS (2000) Transport weight reduction through MDO: the strut-braced wing transonic transport. In: 35th AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang YF (2016) The adventure of truss-braced wing. World Flight (6):54–57. Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moerland EF, Pfeiffer S, Daniel T (2017) On the design of a strut-braced wing configuration in a collaborative design environment. In: 17th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations conference

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang GF, Zeng JS, Lee JT (2015) Preliminary design of a truss-braced natural-laminar-flow composite wing via aeroelastic tailoring. ASD J (3):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xing YF, Yu XS (2018) The wing mass estimation for commercial aircraft with truss-braced wing configuration. Mach Des Manuf Eng (2):83–86. Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xing YF (2018) Integrated analysis and optimization in conceptual design of airliners with truss braced wing configuration. Doctor, Nanjing University of Aeronautic and Astronautic. Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang SF, Ji BS, Bakar AT (2012) Multidisciplinary evaluation of truss-braced wing for future green aircraft. In: 28th international congress of the aeronautical sciences, Bonn, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  15. Locatelli DF, Riggins KS, Kapania KT (2015) A physics-based methodology for cantilever and strut-braced wing weight estimation. In: AIAA aerospace sciences meeting

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ko AF, Mason WS, Grossman BT (2003) Transonic aerodynamics of a wing/pylon/strut juncture. In: 21st AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, AIAA-2003-4062

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ivaldi DF, Secco NRS, Chen ST (2015) Aerodynamic shape optimization of a truss-braced-wing aircraft. In: 16th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ney RF (2019) RANS-based aerodynamic shape optimization of a strut-braced wing with overset meshes. J Aircr 56(1):217–227

    Google Scholar 

  19. Knight KF (2011) Assessment of RANS turbulence models for strut-wing junctions. Master, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tetrault AF, Schetz JS, Grossman BT (2013) Numerical prediction of the interference drag of a streamlined strut intersecting a surface in transonic flow. In: Aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit

    Google Scholar 

  21. Duggirala KF, Roy JS, Schetz AT (2011) Analysis of interference drag for strut-strut interaction in transonic flow. AIAA J 49(3):449–462

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National defense key discipline laboratory of advanced aircraft design technology, NUAA. Great gratitude giving to all the professors and companions of research group MDO305 for their help during the re-search. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of the reviewers, which have improved the presentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lizhen Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, L., Yu, X. (2021). A Study on Aerodynamic Interference for Truss Braced Wing Configuration. In: Jing, Z., Zhan, X. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Aerospace System Science and Engineering 2020. ICASSE 2020. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 680. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6060-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6060-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6059-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6060-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics