Skip to main content

Substantiation of Alternative Fuels Utilization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Alternative Fuels in Ship Power Plants

Abstract

Air pollution caused by the pollution emissions from ships is a serious environmental problem, especially in the areas of equatorial waters and inland waterways. Currently more than 96% of vessels are equipped with diesel ship power plants as the propulsion engines, so the constituents formed in the process of fuel oils burning can contaminate the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. B. P. Pundir, Engine emissions: pollutant formation and advances in control technology. Oxford: Alpha Science International Ltd, 2007, 301 p.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. S. Hachiyan, K. A. Morozov, V. N. Lukanin, Dvigateli vnutrennego sgoraniya [Internal Combustion Engines]. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1985, 311 p.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ya. B. Chertkov, Motornye topliva [Motor Fuels]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 1987, 207 p.

    Google Scholar 

  4. US Environment protection agency. Greenhouse gas properties [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/outreach/scientific.html.

  5. A. Friedrich, F. Heinen, F. Kamakate, D. Kodjak (2007). Air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from ocean-going ships: impacts, mitigation options and opportunities for managing growth. Presented at the international council on clean transportation [Online]. Available: https://www.georgiastrait.org/files/share/PDF/MarineReport_Final_Web.pdf.

  6. N. V. Lazareva, E. N. Levinoy, Vrednye veshchestva v promyshlenosti. Spravochnik dlya himikov [Industry Harmful Substances]. Lvov: Himiya Publ., 1976, p. 592.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Trozzi, R. Vaccaro (1998) Methodologies for estimating future air pollutant emissions from ships [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259470337_Methodologies_for_estimating_air_pollutant_emissions_from_ships_a_2006_update.

  8. The Swedish NGO secretariat on acid rain. Cost-benefit analysis of using 0, 5% marine heavy fuel oil in European sea areas [Online]. Available: www.airclim.org/reports/cba_briefing_jan05.pdf.

  9. A. McKinnon, M. Piecyk (2011, Jan) Measuring and managing CO2 emissions of European chemical transport [Online]. Available: https://www.cefic.org/Documents/IndustrySupport/Transport-and-Logistics/MeasuringAndManagingCO2EmissionOfEuropeanTransport-McKinnon-Report%20-24.01.2011.pdf.

  10. H. N. Psarafitis, C. A. Kontovas, “CO2 emission statistics for the world commercial fleet,” WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, pp. 1–19, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  11. “Controlling emissions in two-stroke marine diesel,” MER, pp. 16–21, Nov. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. “New legal driver for emission monitoring,” The Naval Architect, p. 18, Sep. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Ortmanns (2007) Economic instruments for reducing air pollution from ships. Presented at CCB Annual Conference [Online]. Available: https://www.ccb.se/documents/airpollredshipsSO.pdf.

  14. “Ships’ emissions reach crucial stage,” The Naval Architect, pp. 39–45, March. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. V. Voznitskiy, Praktika ispolzovaniya morskih topliv na sudah [Ships Marine Fuels Use]. Saint Petersburg: Biblioteka sudovogo mehanika Publ., 2006, 124 p.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sacramento: California Environment protection agency (2010) Initial statement of reasons for the proposed rulemaking: staff report [Online]. Available: https://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2010/chc10/harborcraftisor.pdf.

  17. “GL cleans the air,” The Naval Architect, p. 75, Sep. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  18. “Mandatory CO2 Index takes step closer,” Shipping World & Shipbuilder, p. 8, July/Aug. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  19. “Oslo meeting prepared GHG reduction mechanism,” MER, pp. 46–47, Sep. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. Schumacher, A. Chellappa, W. Wetherell, M. D. Russell, “Scientific IMO SOx study completed,” MER, p. 20, Feb. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  21. “Shipping emissions remain burning issue,” The Naval Architect, p. 77, Jan. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  22. “The potential to cut CO2,” The Naval Architect, pp. 30–34, June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. IMO, MEPC.245(66), Annex 5 (2014) Guidelines on the Method of Calculation of the Attained Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for New Ships [Online]. Available: https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Documents/245(66).pdf.

  24. “The ultra-long-stroke engine and Handymax tanker propulsion,” DIESELFACTS, no 3, pp. 6–8, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Indian Register of Shipping (2015) Implementing Energy Efficiency Design Index. [Online]. Available: https://www.irclass.org/files/marine_publications/EEDI_2015.pdf.

  26. M. Simms, “GHG emissions and legislation,” MER, pp. 42–44, May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  27. “Politicians to act on emissions,” MER, pp. 40–42, Apr. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chevron. Diesel Fuels Technical Review [Online]. Available: https://www.chevronwithtechron.ca/products/documents/Diesel_Fuel_Tech_Review.pdf.

  29. “Emission control, two-strokes,” Propulsion, pp. 18–22, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  30. “CIMAC Circle talks emissions,” MER, p. 34, Nov. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Fournier (2006, Feb) Controlling air emission from marine vessels: problems and opportunities [Online]. Available: https://fiesta.bren.ucsb.edu/~kolstad/temporary/Marine_Emissions__2-11-06_.pdf.

  32. O. Masaki (2007) Possible change of ship design including engine room about emissions of NOx and SOx [Online]. Available: https://www.nmri.go.jp/main/cooperation/imo_iso/contents/IMO2007/airpolws/presentation/airpolws4.pdf.

  33. MAN B&W Diesel R&D (2006) Retrofit control technology discussion [Online]. Available: https://www.fasterfreightcleanerair.com/pdfs/Presentations/FFCACA2006/Kjeld%20Aabo%20-%20Low%20Emission%20Technology%20Modifications%20to%20Ships.pdf.

  34. Wärtsilä (2011) Technology review of Wärtsilä 46 engine [Online]. Available: https://www.dieselduck.ca/machine/01%20prime%20movers/rhapsody%20de1/Wartsila%20W46.pdf.

  35. MAN Diesel SE. Humid air motor: technology for green profits [Online]. Available: https://mandieselturbo.com/files/news/filesof15316/3-12%20HumidAirMotor.pdf.

  36. D. Tinsley, “Clean, green and lean,” Shipping World & Shipbuilder, pp. 20–27, Nov. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  37. K. Karsdash, “Retrofit revolution,” Shipping World & Shipbuilder, p. 31, Sep. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  38. “Copenhagen test centre brings NOx to its Knees,” DIESELFACTS, no 3, pp. 11–12, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  39. O. A. Gladkov, Sozdaniye malotoksichnyh dizley rechnyh sudov [Low-toxic Diesel Fuels Development for River Ships]. Lvov: Sudostroyeniye Publ., 1990, 112 p.

    Google Scholar 

  40. “Four-stroke technology and a better environment,” DIESELFACTS, no 3, p. 8, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  41. K. Karsdash, “DK Group welcomes energy index,” MER, pp. 14–15, June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  42. “Keeping up to speed with LNG technology,” Offshore Marine Technology, no 2, p. 14, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  43. “Maintaining a competitive edge,” Shipping World & Shipbuilder, pp. 30–33, Dec/Jan. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  44. “The challenge of cutting CO2,” Propulsion, pp. 4–12, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  45. “Cleaner four strokes,” Propulsion, pp. 42–44, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  46. P. Baan, “Controlling emissions,” Propulsion, pp. 14–18, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  47. “The unseen emission—revealed as a threat,” MER, pp. 40–42, Sep. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  48. P. Kohli. Fuel—energy in ports maritime industry. Cold ironing an overview profits [Online]. Available: https://crosstree.info/Documents/ColdIroning.pdf.

  49. “Improving performance on rivers and canals,” Propulsion, pp. 44–48, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinglin Yang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yang, X., Yang, Z., Wen, H., Gorbov, V., Mitienkova, V., Serbin, S. (2021). Substantiation of Alternative Fuels Utilization. In: Alternative Fuels in Ship Power Plants. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4850-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4850-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4849-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4850-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics