Abstract
Advancements in science and technology have raised our understanding regarding the levels and types of unsustainability to a greater degree. The world is facing formidable challenges in laying down a path towards a sustainable economy. Undoubtedly, several supply-side factors are crucial in sustainability discourse. However, the demand-side factors have a critical role to play in determining—how long-term sustainability would unfold? Globally, the concept of the circular economy (CE) is being advocated as an effective means of ensuring sustainable consumption and production patterns in the times ahead. In this backdrop, this chapter provides a review of the conceptual foundations of the CE as was first proposed by Pearce and Turner, and analyses the scope and methodological framework of CE in terms of its inter-linkages with other fields such as industrial ecology and ecological economics. It further provides an overview of the recent initiatives of the Government of India towards the adoption of CE. Finally, it puts forth an economic perspective towards CE and highlights some potential hindrances in its mainstreaming from the economic methodology point of view in the realm of the neoclassical economic paradigm. It concludes that there is an urgent need to move beyond the techno-centric and business-oriented understanding of CE to a framework that attempts to integrate with the socio-economic realities and development priorities of the developing economies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
It refers to the one “in which even a detailed knowledge of one level of a system is insufficient to predict behaviour at a different level” (pg. 4, Graedel and van der Voet, 2010).
- 2.
Broadly speaking, these “can be considered as components of one general function of natural environments—the function of life support” (Pearce & Turner, 1990). According to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, the ecosystem services are broadly classified as provisioning, regulating, cultural and support services (Costanza et al., 2014).
- 3.
The members were Mr. Vishwanath N. Anand, Dr. Prodipto Ghosh, Dr. Tishyarakshit Chatterjee and Mr. Rajen Habib Khwaja (former officials from the MoEFCC); Dr. Ajay Mathur (Bureau of Energy Efficiency); Dr. Ashok Khosla (Development Alternatives); Ms. Seema Arora (Confederation of Indian Industry); Mr. Ravi Agarwal (Toxics Link); Dr. Prasad Modak (Environmental Management Centre); and Ms. Sunita Narain (Centre for Science and Environment).
- 4.
How widely such mandates reflect (or capture) the social preferences remains subject to the choice of the voting rule and the pursuit of democratic values and culture in the society as a whole. Such a discussion remains beyond the scope of this study.
- 5.
This is not to imply them as being an exhaustive list of such hindrances (or barriers). For instance, Kirchherr et al. (2018) identify a different set of barriers in the implementation of CE for the European Union and classify them as being cultural, market-related, regulatory and technological in nature.
References
Ayres, R. U. (1994). Industrial metabolism: Theory and policy. In: B. R. Allenby & D. J. Richard (Eds.), The greening of industrial ecosystems, Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
Becker, U., Fernandes, T., Arora, R., Banerjee, A., & Saluja, M.S. (2019). The Indian resource panel: A mechanism to promote resource efficiency policy throughout the Indian economy. In Waste management and resource efficiency (pp. 275–285). Singapore: Springer.
Bruel, A., Kronenberg, J., Troussier, N., & Guillaume, B. (2019). Linking industrial ecology and ecological economics: A theoretical and empirical foundation for the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 12–21.
Costanza, R., Cumberland, J. H., Daly, H., Goodland, R., Norgaard, R. B., Kubiszewski, I., & Franco, C. (2014). In: An introduction to ecological economics. CRC Press.
Desai, N. (2020, July 13). Nature in peril. Business Standard. Available via https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/nature-in-peril-120071301511_1.html. Accessed on 13th July 2020.
EEA. (2016). Circular economy in Europe: Developing the knowledge base. European Environment Agency.
EU-REI. (2018a). Towards resource efficiency electric vehicle sector in India. European Union’s Resource Efficiency Initiative (EU-REI) Project, New Delhi: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.
EU-REI. (2018b). Greening the solar PV value chain. European Union’s Resource Efficiency Initiative (EU-REI) Project, New Delhi: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.
EU-REI. (2018c). Fostering resource efficiency in the India building and construction sector. European Union’s Resource Efficiency Initiative (EU-REI) Project, New Delhi: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.
EU-REI. (2018d). Enhancing resource efficiency through extended producer responsibility—sector study on plastic packaging and E-Waste management in India. European Union’s Resource Efficiency Initiative (EU-REI) Project, New Delhi: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy–A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768.
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.
Giampietro, M. (2019). On the circular bioeconomy and decoupling: Implications for sustainable growth. Ecological Economics, 162, 143–156.
GOI. (2019). Economic survey 2018-19 (Vol. II). New Delhi: Government of India.
Graedel, T. E., & van der Voet, E. (Eds.). (2010). Linkages of sustainability. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Hussen, A. (2013). Principles of environmental economics and sustainability: An integrated economic and ecological approach (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
InRP. (2017). Recommendations for an indian resource efficiency programme: A guiding document for policy makers by the indian resource panel, New Delhi. Available via http://re.urban-industrial.in/live/hrdpmp/hrdpmaster/igep/content/e64918/e64922/e67075/e67084/DMS_GIZ_IREP_PolicyBrief.pdf. Accessed on 13th April 2020.
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., et al. (2018). Barriers to the circular economy: Evidence from the European union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, 264–272.
Kolstad, C. (2012). Intermediate environmental economics. South Asia Edition: Oxford University Press.
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37–46.
Manderson, E. J., & Considine, T. J. (2018). An economic perspective on industrial ecology. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 12(2), 304–323.
Millar, N., McLaughlin, E., & Börger, T. (2019). The circular economy: Swings and roundabouts? Ecological Economics, 158, 11–19.
MoEFCC. (2019). Draft national resource efficiency policy 2019. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi: Government of India.
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380.
Naden, C. (2019). Connecting the dots in a circular economy: A new ISO technical committee just formed. Accessed 16 June 2020. <https://www.iso.org/news/ref2402.html>.
Nayak, P. B. (2020). Present crises of capitalism and its reforms. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(17), 42–48.
NITI Aayog. (2019a). Strategy on resource efficiency in aluminium sector. New Delhi: National Institution for Transforming India, Government of India.
NITI Aayog. (2019b). Strategy on resource efficiency in steel sector. New Delhi: National Institution for Transforming India, Government of India.
NITI Aayog. (2019c). Strategy on resource efficiency in electrical and electronic equipment sector. New Delhi: National Institution for Transforming India, Government of India.
NITI Aayog. (2019d). Strategy on resource efficiency in construction and demolition sector. New Delhi: National Institution for Transforming India, Government of India.
NITI Aayog. (2019e). Resource efficiency and circular economy-current status and way forward. New Delhi: National Institution for Transforming India, Government of India.
Pearce, D. W. & Turner, R. K. (1990). In: Economics of natural resources and the environment. JHU Press.
PIB. (2018). Environment Ministry, TERI Sign MOU to Set up a Resource Efficiency Cell; Launch Initiatives to Reduce, Reuse and recycle Plastic Waste, Press Information Bureau, Available via https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1534176. Accessed on 13th April 2020.
Richards, D. J., Allenby, B. R., & Frosch, R. A. (1994). The greening of industrial ecosystems: Overview and perspective. In B. R. Allenby & D. J. Richard (Eds.), The greening of industrial ecosystems, Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
Saavedra, Y. M., Iritani, D. R., Pavan, A. L., & Ometto, A. R. (2018). Theoretical contribution of industrial ecology to circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1514–1522.
Smith, V. L., & Wilson, B. J. (2019). In Humanomics: Moral sentiments and the wealth of nations for the twenty-first century. Cambridge University Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2017). Markets, States and institutions. In A. Mishra & T. Ray (Eds.), Markets, governance and institutions in the process of economic development: A festschrift in honour of Kaushik Basu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
TERI. (2019). Reference report for national resource efficiency policy for india, prepared for ministry of environment forests and climate change (MoEFCC). New Delhi: Government of India, The Energy and Resources Institute.
WEF. (2019). The next frontier: Natural resource targets—Shaping a competitive circular economy within planetary boundaries. White Paper: World Economic Forum.
Winans, K., Kendall, A., & Deng, H. (2017). The history and current applications of the circular economy concept. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 825–833.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix I: RE Framework in India
Appendix I: RE Framework in India
The key thrust areas and the set of initiatives that are considered crucial for promoting RE in India are as follows:
I. Policies |
•Formulate a national policy on RE for all types of resources (biotic and abiotic) addressing various life cycle stages and key stakeholders • Formulate a national policy on Sustainable Public Procurement (SPP) to minimise consumption of resources, reduce waste generation and GHG emissions, as well as contribute to innovation in materials and technology in the space of RE • Strengthen existing sectoral policies and programmes of Ministry of Mines by incorporating RE principles • Formulate a national policy for end-of-life-vehicles (ELVs) • Formulate a Waste to Resource Management Directive based on existing waste and hazardous substance management rules/regulations following a life cycle approach targeting relevant stakeholders and focussing on RE |
II. Programmes and Mainstreaming |
• Mainstream RE initiatives by leveraging existing flagship programmes and schemes like Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, Smart Cities, Make in India, Startup India, Digital India and others • Industry may leverage Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Corporate Environmental Responsibility (CER) and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for RE initiatives • Build on the National Chemical Management Plan being drafted by Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) to develop a strategy, framework and guidelines for the safe and circular management of chemicals • Leverage the national clean energy and environment fund to finance infrastructure, clean technologies and related RE initiatives |
III. Regulations |
• Establish a national coordinating body—Bureau of Resource Efficiency (BRE) between various ministries to identify, implement and achieve national RE goals • Establish state-level coordinating bodies to identify, implement and achieve state-level RE goals • Large and resource-intensive industries and bulk waste generation may be mandated to file the Resource Use and Efficiency Statement • Establish and mandate a “Consent to Close” requirement for medium and large industries in the “RED” category to ensure that waste streams are responsibly managed and recycled before closure •Rationalise tax regime on critical virgin raw materials to make secondary raw material price competitive |
IV. Setting up a Dynamic Recycling Industry |
• Promote the establishment of Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs) with the allocation of land in urban areas and industrial estates • Facilitate urban local bodies (ULBs) to undertake urban mining and create secure landfills. •Facilitate the establishment of Producer Responsibility Organisation (PRO) for waste recycling and for engagement with the informal sector • Facilitate innovation to enhance resource recovery and improve working conditions by integrating the informal sector into the waste value chain • Establish a remanufacturing council or association to catalyse the growth of the remanufacturing industry • Establish and manage platforms for waste exchange by expanding the SBM portal |
V. R&D and Technology Development |
• Support R&D to develop scalable technologies for RE • Create and manage knowledge platforms that facilitate open innovation, provide access to experts and engage academia to support the transition towards RE • Leverage technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, block chain, etc., for the recycling industry |
VI. Capacity Development, Outreach and Monitoring |
• Facilitate creation of accredited laboratories that could conduct testing (especially for recycled products) as well as provide advisory services • Provide capacity development support on RE for ministries/departments at the national and state levels • Develop and promote programmes and certifications for informal sector skill development in RE • Develop and launch citizen awareness programmes on RE • Foster intergovernmental collaboration and knowledge exchange with the G20, RE dialogue and other bodies like International Resource Panel and other national and international forums • Develop monitoring and outcome indicators for tracking progress on RE • Establish and mandate the certification for operators managing waste-to-resource recycling centres to ensure safe, efficient and net positive operations |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singhal, R. (2021). Recourse to the Circular Economy: The Path Ahead. In: Dasgupta, P., Saha, A.R., Singhal, R. (eds) Sustainable Development Insights from India. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4830-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4830-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4829-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4830-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)