Advertisement

A Case Study of Key Processes Experienced in an English “A” Level Literature Classroom

Chapter
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

When considering the concept of modernity, we need to look through the lens of the local in order to chart our own development as a modern, independent nation. A cursory search about teaching Literature in English in Brunei (henceforth Literature) only comes up with Chin, Ho and Alkaff (International Journal of Learning 18:117–134, 2012), a preliminary investigation into the teaching of Literature in the Bruneian ESL Classroom. As a current teacher of Literature with ten years of experience, I find this lack of research into the Bruneian experience of teaching Literature alarming. How can teachers improve professionally, and how can they be sure that what they are doing in the classroom is effective for their students?

References

  1. ACLA. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies.Google Scholar
  2. Bandial, A. (2017, October 10). From protectorate to partnership: 50 years of Brunei-UK ties. The Scoop. Retrieved from https://thescoop.co/2017/10/10/protectorate-partnership-50-years-brunei-uk-ties/.
  3. Benton, M. (1984). The methodology vacuum in teaching literature. Language Arts, 61(3), 265–275.Google Scholar
  4. Brookfield, S., & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Cambridge Assessment International Education. (2018). Cambridge international AS and A level English—Literature (9695). Retrieved from Cambridge Assessment International Education https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/programmes-and-qualifications/cambridge-international-as-and-a-level-english-literature-9695/.
  6. Cambridge Assessment International Education. (2019). Cambridge assessment international education. Retrieved from Examination Resources for EnglishLiterature (9695) Cambridge Assessment International Education https://schoolsupporthub.cambridgeinternational.org/past-exam-papers/?keywords=9695.
  7. Carrsaco, D., & Torres Irribarra, D. (2018). The role of classroom discussion. In A. Sandoval-Hernandez, M. Isac, & D. Miranda (Eds.), Teaching tolerance in a globalized world (pp. 87–101). London: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Chin, G. V. S., Ho, D., & Alkaff, S. (2012). The teaching of English Literature in the Bruneian ESL secondary classroom: A preliminary investigation. International Journal of Learning, 18, 117–134.Google Scholar
  9. Choo, S. S. (2014). Towards a transnational model of critical values education: The case for Literature education in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35(2), 226–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corrigan, P. T. (2018, October). The state of scholarship in teaching Literature. Pedagogy, 18(3), 415–432.Google Scholar
  11. Dass, R., Chapman, A., & O’Neill, M. (2012). Literature in English studies: A theory of how teachers and students in Singapore secondary schools deal with the subject. Joint Australian Association for Research in Education and Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association Conference (pp. 1–12). Sydney: Joint Australian Association for Research in Education and Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association Conference.Google Scholar
  12. Fromm, E. (1979). To have or to be?. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  13. Hofstede, G. (2015, August 8). 6D model of national culture. Retrieved from https://geerthofstede.com/.
  14. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levine, G. (2001). The two nations. Pedagogy, 1(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lim, J. (2015). What happens in a literature classroom? A hermeneutic phenomenological perspective. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 11(1), 52–66.Google Scholar
  17. Loh, R. C., & Teo, T. (2017). Understanding Asian students learning styles, cultural influence and learning strategies. Journal of Education and Social Policy, 7(1), 194–210.Google Scholar
  18. Muddiman, E. (2018). Instrumentalism amongst students: A cross-national comparison of the significance of subject choice. British Journal of Sociology Education, 39(5), 607–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. National Centre for Educational Statistics. (2020). Digest of educational statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_322.10.asp.
  20. Omar, Y. (2017). The inclusion of Literature components in Malaysian English papers: The challenges and pros in teaching and learning. Al-Ta lim Journal, 24(3), 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board. (2019). Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board. Retrieved from Literature in English, Singapore-Cambridge General Certificate of Education Advanced Level Higher 2 (2018) Syllabus 9509 https://www.seab.gov.sg/content/syllabus/alevel/2018Syllabus/9509_2018.pdf.
  22. Sprague, J., & Stuart, D. (2000). The speaker’s handbook. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Towndrow, P., & Beng, D. K. K. (2017). The teaching of literature in a Singapore secondary school: Disciplinarity, curriculum coverage and the opportunity costs involved. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(3), 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weale, S. (2019, August 14). ‘Less fun’ English declines as choice for A-Level pupils. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/aug/14/less-fun-english-declines-as-choice-for-a-level-pupils.
  25. Weale, S., & Larsson, N. (2019, August 16). ‘Students don’t see the value’: Why A-level English is in decline. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/aug/16/students-dont-see-value-a-level-english-decline.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maktab Duli Pengiran Muda Al-Muhtadee BillahBandar Seri BegawanBrunei

Personalised recommendations