Abstract
Box–Behnken designs (BBD) are the very efficient response surface design which provides information exclusively on the effect of experiment variables and overall experimental error in a minimum number of required runs. These designs possess very good symmetry and rotatability and also produce minimal experimental runs, as compared to the popular CCD and deliver maximal information. As a response surface design, BBD requires three levels (−1, 0, 1) and can be applicable for a number of factors ranging between 3 and 21. It is possible to use both numerical and categorical factors for optimization in a BBD, but use of categorical factors tends to increase the number of runs. Due to high resolution of CCDs, these can be efficiently useful for a variety of drug product and process optimization. The present chapter provides complete details regarding the application of BBD in pharmaceutical drug product development and optimization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beg S, Swain S, Rahman M, Hasnain MS, Imam SS (2019) Chapter 3 - Application of design of experiments (DoE) in pharmaceutical product and process optimization. In: Beg S, Hasnain MS (eds) Pharmaceutical quality by design. Academic Press, New York, pp 43–64
Singh B, Raza K, Beg S (2013) Developing “optimized” drug products employing “designed” experiments. Chem Ind Dig 23:70–76
Beg S, Rahman M, Robaian MA, Alruwaili NK, Imam SS, Panda SK (2020) Pharmaceutical drug product development and process optimization: effective use of quality by design. CRC Press, New York
Singh B, Beg S (2013) Quality by design in product development life cycle. Chron Pharmabiz 22:72–79
Beg S, Hasnain MS, Rahman M, Swain S (2019) Chapter 1 - Introduction to quality by design (QbD): fundamentals, principles, and applications. In: Beg S, Hasnain MS (eds) Pharmaceutical quality by design. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–17
Beg S, Hasnain MS (2019) Pharmaceutical quality by design: principles and applications. Academic Press, New York
Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995) Response surface methodology: process and product in optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New York
Beg S, Rahman M, Panda SS (2017) Pharmaceutical QbD: omnipresence in the product development lifecycle. Eur Pharm Rev 22(1):58–64
Alam N, Beg S, Rizwan M, Ahmad A, Ahmad FJ, Ali A, Aqil M (2015) Mucoadhesive elementary osmotic pump tablets of trimetazidine for controlled drug delivery and reduced variability in oral bioavailability. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 41(4):692–702
Pani NR, Nath LK, B B (2010) Formulation, development, and optimization of immediate release nateglinide tablets by factorial design. Drug Discov Ther 4(6):453–458
Mostafa HF, Ibrahim MA, Sakr A (2013) Development and optimization of dextromethorphan hydrobromide oral disintegrating tablets: effect of formulation and process variables. Pharm Dev Technol 18(2):454–463
Bansal S, Beg S, Asthana A, Garg B, Asthana GS, Kapil R, Singh B (2016) QbD-enabled systematic development of gastroretentive multiple-unit microballoons of itopride hydrochloride. Drug Deliv 23(2):437–451
Karasulu HY, Ertan G, Günerï T (1996) 33 factorial design-based optimization of the formulation of nitrofurantoin microcapsules. Pharm World Sci 18(1):20–25
Jain V, Prasad D, Jain D, Mishra SK, Singh R (2011) Factorial design-based development of mesalamine microspheres for colonic delivery. Biomatter 1(2):182–188
Singh I, Kamboj S, Rana V (2017) Quality by design based fabrication of iron oxide induced mucoadhesive microspheres for enhanced bioavailability of cinnarizine. Curr Drug Deliv 14(8):1154–1169
Gonzalez-Rodriguez ML, Barros LB, Palma J, Gonzalez-Rodriguez PL, Rabasco AM (2007) Application of statistical experimental design to study the formulation variables influencing the coating process of lidocaine liposomes. Int J Pharm 337(1–2):336–345
Glogard C, Stensrud G, Hovland R, Fossheim SL, Klaveness J (2002) Liposomes as carriers of amphiphilic gadolinium chelates: the effect of membrane composition on incorporation efficacy and in vitro relaxivity. Int J Pharm 233(1–2):131–140
Nasr M, Mansour S, Mortada ND, El Shamy AA (2008) Lipospheres as carriers for topical delivery of aceclofenac: preparation, characterization and in vivo evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech 9(1):154–162
Daspaul S, Mazumder R, Bhattacharya S, AK J (2013) Optimization of polymeric nano drug delivery system using 3(2) full factorial design. Curr Drug Deliv 10(4):394–403
Yadav KS, KK S (2010) Formulation optimization of etoposide loaded PLGA nanoparticles by double factorial design and their evaluation. Curr Drug Deliv 7(1):51–64
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beg, S., Raza, K. (2021). Full Factorial and Fractional Factorial Design Applications in Pharmaceutical Product Development. In: Beg, S. (eds) Design of Experiments for Pharmaceutical Product Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4717-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4717-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4716-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4717-5
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)