Abstract
This chapter begins with a brief description of the challenges facing liberal democracies around the world. It then places these challenges within the discussion about how democracy itself is changing, and posits that one of the influences of this change is the increasingly complex or ‘wicked’ nature of the challenges faced by citizens and nation states. Next, there is a discussion about the failure of current models of civics and citizenship education to prepare young people for these challenges, before an alternative, complex model is proposed. The chapter concludes with an explanation of the rest of the structure of this book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banks, J. A. (2017). Failed citizenship and transformative civic education. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 366–377.
Beauchamp, Z. (2018, September 13). It happened there: How democracy died in Hungary. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/13/17823488/hungary-democracy-authoritarianism-trump.
Beckett, D., & Hager, P. (2019). The emergence of complexity: Rethinking education as a social science. Cham: Springer.
Berlet, C., & Lyons, M. N. (2000). Right-wing populism in America: Too close for comfort. New York: Guilford Press.
Browning, C. R. (2018, October 25). The suffocation of democracy. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2018/10/25/suffocation-of-democracy/.
Bruff, I. (2013). The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 26(1), 113–129.
Chesters, G., & Welsh, I. (2006). Complexity and social movements: Multitudes at the edge of chaos. London: Routledge.
Christopherson, S. (1994). The fortress city: Privatized spaces, consumer citizenship. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A reader (pp. 409–427). Oxford: Blackwell.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2009). Complexity as a theory of education. TCI (Transnational Curriculum Inquiry), 5(2), 33–44.
Falk, R. (1993). The making of global citizenship. In J. Brecher, J. Brown Childs, & J. Cutler (Eds.), Global visions: Beyond the new world order (pp. 39–52). Boston, MA: South End Press.
Fisher, D. R., Dow, D. M., & Ray, R. (2017, September 20). Intersectionality takes it to the streets: Mobilizing across diverse interests for the Women’s March. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/9/eaao1390.abstract.
Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2017). The signs of deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 5–15.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage.
Gaztambide-Fernandez, R., Cairns, K., Kawashima, Y., Menna, L., & VanderDussen, E. (2011). Portraiture as pedagogy: Learning research through the exploration of context and methodology. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 12(4), 1–29.
Gholami, R. (2018). Citizenship and education in an age of extremisms. In A. Peterson, G. Stahl, & H. Soong (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of citizenship and education (pp. 1–15). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Giroux, H. A. (2018). Terror of neoliberalism authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. London: Routledge.
Gleason, B. (2013). #Occupy Wall Street: Exploring informal learning about a social movement on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 966–982.
Hackmann, D. G. (2002). Using portraiture in educational leadership research. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 5(1), 51–60.
Heggart, K., Arvanitakis, J., & Matthews, I. (2018). Civics and citizenship education: What have we learned and what does it mean for the future of Australian democracy? Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 14(2), 101–117.
Hough, D. (2017, September 25). Germany’s AfD: How to understand the rise of the right-wing populists. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://theconversation.com/germanys-afd-how-to-understand-the-rise-of-the-right-wing-populists-84541.
Jess, M., Atencio, M., & Thorburn, M. (2011). Complexity theory: Supporting curriculum and pedagogy developments in Scottish physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 16(2), 179–199.
Joppke, C. (2007). Transformation of citizenship: Status, rights, identity. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 37–48.
Kennedy, K. (1997). Citizenship education and the modern state. London: Falmouth Press.
Kurtz, C. F., & Snowden, D. J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 462–483.
LaFree, G. (2018, May 15). Is Antifa a terrorist group? Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12115-018-0246-x.
Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (1983). The good high school. New York: Basic Books.
Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Hoffman Davis, J. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Maitles, H., & Gilchrist, I. (2004, September). We’re not citizens in waiting, we’re citizens now! A case study of a democratic approach to learning in an RME secondary class in the West of Scotland. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, University of Crete.
Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marshall, T. H. (1964). Class, citizenship, and social development: Essays of T. H. Marshall. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (1989). Hobart declaration on educational goals for young Australians. MCEETYA.
Morrison, K. (2006, November 28–30). Complexity theory and education, ÂPERA Conference 2006. Hong Kong.
Morrison, K. (2008). Educational philosophy and the challenge of complexity theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 19–34.
Nicoll, K., Fejes, A., Olson, M., Dalhstedt, M., & Biesta, G. (2013). Opening discourses of citizenship education: A theorization with Foucault. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), 828–846.
Norbeg, J., & Cumming, G. (Eds.). (2008). Complexity theory for a sustainable future. New York: Colombia University Press.
O’Loughlin, M. (1997). Education for citizenship: Integrating knowledge, imagination, and democratic dispositions. Forum of Education, 52(2), 24–33.
Rickford, R. (2016). Black lives matter: Toward a modern practice of mass struggle. New Labor Forum, 25(1), 34–42.
Riotta, C. (2018, August 6). Nobody has any idea how much Trump’s border wall will cost—Including the White House. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-border-wall-mexico-cost-white-house-pay-price-taxpayers-money-a8480381.html.
Salami, M. (2017, February 13). Utopian thinking: The eclipse of neoliberalism heralds a new dawn of sharing | Minna Salami. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/13/utopian-thinking-neoliberalism-the-commons.
Semetsky, I. (2008). On the creative logic of education, or: Re-reading Dewey through the lens of complexity science. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 83–95.
Senate Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Training. (1989). Education for active citizenship in Australian schools and youth organisations. Australian Government Publishing Service.
Sharma, R. (2016, July 29). Globalisation as we know it is over—And Brexit is the biggest sign yet | Ruchir Sharma. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/28/era-globalisation-brexit-eu-britain-economic-frustration.
Staples, L. (2012). Community organizing for social justice: Grassroots groups for power. Social Work with Groups, 35(3), 287–296.
Taylor, P. (2018, March 7). EU to migrants: Go home and stay home. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-migration-refugees-drop-dead-angela-merkel-matteo-salvini-libya-italy-germany-refugees/.
Tharoor, I. (2017, October 30). How the republic starts to fall. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/10/30/how-the-republic-starts-to-fall/.
Tufekci, Z. (2014). Social movements and governments in the digital age: Evaluating a complex landscape. Journal of International Affairs, 68(1), 1–18. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24461703.
Walby, S. (2007, December 1). Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0048393107307663.
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004a). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269.
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004b). Educating the “good” citizen: Political choices and pedagogical goals. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37(2), 241–247.
Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 39–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Research Portraits: An Introduction
Research Portraits: An Introduction
It is worth noting that the data in this book is not presented in a traditional way; rather than a number of chapters wherein I discuss my data and findings, I have crafted a number of narrative vignettes or research portraits, as first described by Lawrence-Lightfoot (1983). These are a series of chronologically ordered narrative accounts about my experiences as a teacher-observer before and during the teaching of Justice Citizens. I have chosen this approach because I it allows me to share the ‘rich description’ that is so integral to developing an understanding of the Justice Citizens project.
Sara Lawrence-Lightfoot (1983) (see also Lawrence-Lightfoot and Hoffman Davis 1997) developed research portraiture as an inductive research method, ‘to explore participant’s experiences and the complexities of how meanings are produced within a particular context’ (Gaztambide-Fernandez et al. 2011, p. 4). Research portraiture is an approach to research that embraces complexity and contradiction; it seeks understanding, rather than to prove or disprove any particular theory. This makes it particularly valuable for educational research, especially in fields like citizenship education, where there has been a lot of contestation and argument about different theories. Also important is the fact that research portraiture does not begin from a deficit model; that is, it does not begin with the question, ‘What is wrong in schools’? Instead, it focuses on ‘local meanings’ and ‘seeks goodness’ (p. 5).
Research portraiture is effective because it narrows the gap between narrative and analysis. In some ways, it is more honest in its approach than other qualitative methodologies because
Recognizing that descriptions are always interpretive, the portraitist uses creative writing to carefully craft a narrative that integrates her analysis of the data while also leaving the text open for interpretation. (Gaztambide-Fernandez et al., p. 5)
Using research portraiture the researcher combines interpretation and analysis with narrative aspects. Naturally, this includes weaving together the researcher’s own personal context with the experiences of the research participants to such an extent that the line between researcher and research participants becomes increasingly blurred; thus research portraiture becomes truly interpretive.
Through these portraits, it is possible to make real those parts of the educational world that are often excluded from research. This attention to detail and description means that there is a more holistic approach to the data, which evokes a feeling of authenticity—something that qualitative research is often criticised for lacking. According to Hackmann, research portraiture ‘makes the researcher’s biases and experiences explicit, in essence becoming a lens through which the researcher processes and analyses data’ (2002, p. 52).
The research portraits presented throughout this book have been crafted after reviewing the interviews that I conducted with each student and stakeholder, as well as the notes I took as the teacher-observer during the Justice Citizens project. By crafting these research portraits, I believe I have met two goals: first, I have come to better understand young peoples’ conceptions of citizenship and the ways they see themselves as active participants in the space of their local communities; and second, the portraits provide a meaningful way to share my findings with other interested parties.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heggart, K. (2020). Introduction: Complexity, Wicked Problems and Citizenship Education. In: Activist Citizenship Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4694-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4694-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4693-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4694-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)