Skip to main content

Principles of Eco-Management in a Large-Scale Ecosystem of Tropical Peatland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tropical Peatland Eco-management

Abstract

In dome-shaped tropical peatlands, mainly on the maritime continent of Southeast Asia, rainfall provides the only water supply and no nutrients, which has a very strong impact on plant growth, ecosystem conservation, and peatland management.

When considering new peatland management systems in tropical peatlands, called “Eco-management in a Large-scale Ecosystem of Tropical Peatland,” the following three factors cannot be ignored.

  • Water Cycle and Water Reservoir,

  • Carbon Cycle and Carbon Reservoir, and

  • Nutrient Cycle and Nutrient Reservoir.

The tropical peatlands store vast amounts of water and carbon, while they are extremely poor in nutrients. Under the conditions of these unique characteristics, peat swamp forests have been maintained. However, exploitation for agriculture and forestry has led to massive drainage of tropical peatlands, resulting in the release of carbon as CO2 emissions. Meanwhile, the poor nutrient status of these peatlands has led to the intensive application of fertilizer to cultivate plants. It is already clear that these activities lead to the destruction of peatlands. The preservation of the close relationship and functions of water, carbon, and nutrients is essential for the maintenance and restoration of tropical peat ecosystems. To maintain or sustainably use tropical peatlands, water management systems need to be fundamentally rethought.

A key element of the tropical peatland ecosystem is the water statute. The water management system is clarified as Stock-based Water Management (WM) [irrigation system] and Drainage-based Water Management (WM) [drainage system]. The proposed eco-management of tropical peatland includes (1) the importance of Stock-based WM, (2) how to establish Stock-based WM, and (3) how to improve Drainage-based WM in Stock-based WM.

Tropical peatland management should be conducted through Stock-based WM instead of the previous and destructive Drainage-based WM. The introduction of Stock-based WM with no fertilizer would also allow for carbon-negative management. Although there are also concerns about the impacts of the destruction of tropical forests on the global water cycle, the proposed Stock-based WM system and reforestation could play an important role in pumping water into the atmosphere. Therefore, Drainage-based WM should be replaced by Stock-based WM at the earliest possible time to reduce global climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagley JE, Desai AR, Dirmeyer PA, Foley JA (2012) Effects of land cover change on moisture availability and potential crop yield in the world’s breadbaskets. Environ Res Lett 7:014009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer C, Reichstein M, Tomelleri E, Ciais P, Jung M, Carvalhais N, Rödenbeck C, Arain MA, Baldocchi D, Bonan GB, Bondeau A, Cescatti A, Lasslop G, Lindroth A, Lomas M, Luyssaert S, Margolis H, Oleson KW, Roupsard O, Veenendaal E, Viovy N, Williams C, Ian Woodward F, Papale D (2010) Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and Covariation with climate. Science 329:834–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb AR, Hoyt AM, Gandois L, Eri J, Dommain R, Salim KA et al (2017) How temporal pattens in rainfall determine the geomorphology and carbon fluxes of tropical peatlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 26:01090

    Google Scholar 

  • Comeau LP, Hergoualc'h K, Hartill J, Smith J, Verchot LV, Peak D, Salim AM (2016) How do the heterotrophic and the total soil respiration of an oil palm plantation on peat respond to nitrogen fertilizer application? Geoderma 268:41–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darmosarkoro W, Sutarta ES, Winarna (2003) Teknologi pemupukan tanaman kelapa sawit Dalam Lahan dan Pemupukan Kelapa Sawit. Pusat Penelitian Kelapa Sawit, Medan, pp 113–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommain R, Couwenberg J, Joosten H (2010) Hydrological self-regulation of domed peatlands in south-East Asia and consequences for conservation and restoration. Mires Peat 6(05):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommain R, Cobb AR, Joosten H, Glaser PH, Chua AF, Gandois L et al (2015) Forest dynamics and tip-up pools drive pulses of high carbon accumulation rates in a tropical peat dome in Borneo (Southeast Asia). J Geophys Res Biogeosci 120:617–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison D, Futter MN, Bishop K (2012) On the forest cover–water yield debate: from demand- to supply-side thinking. Glob Change Biol 18:806–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison D, Wang-Erlandsson L, van der Ent R, van Noordwijk M (2019) Upwind forests: managing moisture recycling for nature-based resilience. Unasylva 70(251):14–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbricht T, Roman-Cuesta RM, Verchot L, Herold M, Wittmann F, Householder E, Herold N, Murdiyarso D (2017) An expert system model for mapping tropical wetlands and peatlands reveals South America as the largest contributor. Glob Change Biol 23:3581–3599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison ME et al (2019) Tropical forest and peatland conservation in Indonesia: challenges and directions. People Nature 2:4–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil A, Langmann B, Aldrian E (2007) Indonesian peat and vegetation fire emissions: study on factors influencing large-scale smoke haze pollution using a regional atmospheric chemistry model. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 12:113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hergoualcʼh K, Verchot LV (2014) Greenhouse gas emission factors for land use and land-use change in southeast Asian peatlands. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 19:789–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkins SB, Richardson CJ, Dommain R, Wang H, Glaser PH, Verbeke B et al (2018) Tropical peatland carbon storage linked to global latitudinal trends in peat recalcitrance. Nat Commun 9:3640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden J, Chapman PJ, Labadz JC (2004) Artificial drainage of peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration. Prog Phys Geogr 28(1):95–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooijer A, Page S, Jauhiainen J, Lee WA, Lu XX, Idris A, Anshari G (2012) Subsidence and carbon loss in drained tropical peatlands. Biogeosciences 9(3):1053–1071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houterman J and Ritzema H (2009) Land and water management in the ex-mega Rice project area in Central Kalimantan. Technical Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijnen H, Wooster M, Kaiser J et al (2016) Fire carbon emissions over maritime Southeast Asia in 2015 largest since 1997. Sci Rep 6:26886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Indonesian Government Regulation (2016) No. 57 of 2016 about the amendment of Indonesian government Regulation no. 71 of 2014 about the protection and Management of Peatland Ecosystem

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikura K, Hirano T, Okimoto Y, Kiew F (2018) Soil carbon dioxide emissions due to oxidative peat decomposition in an oil palm plantation on tropical peat. Agric Ecosyst Environ 254:202–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenicke J, Wösten H, Budiman A, Siegert F (2010) Planning hydrological restoration of peatlands in Indonesia to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15(3):223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joosten H, Clarke D (2002) Wise use of mires and Peatlands: background and principles including a framework for decision-making. International Mire Conservation Group and International Peat Society, Greifswald, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Bowman KW, Schimel D, Parazoo N, Jiang Z, Lee M et al (2017) Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015-2016 El Niño. Science 358:eaam5690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutert E, Fairhurst TH, von Uexküll HR (1999) Agronomic management of oil palms on deep peat. Better Crops Int 13(1):25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Osaki M (2014) Concept of Satoyama system of resilience and vulnerability of bioproduction ecosystem in Asia. Glob Environ Res 18:113–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Page SE, Baird AJ (2016) Peatlands and global change: response and resilience. Annu Rev Environ Resour 41(1):35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page S, Rieley J, Wüst R (2006) Chapter 7 lowland tropical peatlands of Southeast Asia. In: Developments in earth surface processes, vol 9. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 145–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Page SE, Rieley JO, Banks CJ (2011) Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Glob Chang Biol 17:798–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce F (2020) A controversial Russian theory claims forests don’t just make rain—they make wind, Earth Physics, 2020, https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/controversial-russian-theory-claims-forests-don-t-just-make-rain-they-make-wind

  • Ramage CS (1968) Role of a tropical “maritime continent” in the atmospheric circulation. Mon Weather Rev 96(6):365–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzema H, Wösten H (2002) Hydrology of Borneo’s peat swamps. STRAPEAT – Status Report Hydrology

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzema H, Limin S, Kitso KSN and Jauhiainen J (2008) Canal blocking strategies to restore hydrology in degraded tropical peatlands in the former Mega Rice Project in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. In: Abang F, Jusoh I, Ui Hang ED, Han Hoy AW, Roslan HA (Eds.) Conference: International Symposium and Workshop on Tropical Peatlands ‘Peatland development: wise use and impact management’At: Kuching, Sarawak Volume, Proceedings, pp. 260–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Swails E, Jaye D, Verchot L, Hergoualc’h K, Schirrmann M, Borchard N, Wahyuni N, Lawrence D (2017) Will CO2 emissions from drained tropical peatlands decline over time? Links between soil organic matter quality, nutrients, and C mineralization rates. Ecosystems 21:868–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Bellen S, Larivière S (2020) The ecosystem of peatland research: a bibliometric analysis. Mires Peat 26(15):30

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Ent RJ, Savenije HHG, Schaefli B (2010) Origin and fate of atmospheric moisture over continents. Water Resour Res 46:W09525

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang-Erlandsson L, van der Ent RJ, Gordon LJ, Savenije HHG (2014) Contrasting roles of interception and transpiration in the hydrological cycle – part 1: temporal characteristics over land. Earth Syst Dynam 5:441–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden J, Noone D, Bowman K (2007) Importance of rain evaporation and continental convection in the tropical water cycle. Nature 445:528–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wösten H, Ritzema H (2001) Land and water management options for peatland development in Sarawak, Malaysia. Int Peat J 11:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka MD (2016) Physical climatology of Indonesian maritime continent: an outline to comprehend observational studies. Atmos Res 178–179:231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ideas for eco-management of tropical peatland were mainly obtained from a SATRREPS (Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development) project entitled “Wild fire and carbon management in peat forest in Indonesia”, founded by JST (Japan Science and Technology Agency) and JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency), the IJ-REDD project founded by JICA, and a JICA-JPS-BRG Program from the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA, Japan), the Japan Peatland Society (JPS, Japan) and the Peatland Restoration Agency (BRG, Indonesia). This chapter also depended on the results obtained from FOERDIA-PT. WSL/PT. MTI Pilot Project, PT. WSL/PT. MTI-JPS Collaboration Program, PT. WSL/PT. MTI-IDH The Sustainable Trade Initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsuyoshi Kato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kato, T., Osaki, M., Tsuji, N., Silsigia, S. (2021). Principles of Eco-Management in a Large-Scale Ecosystem of Tropical Peatland. In: Osaki, M., Tsuji, N., Foead, N., Rieley, J. (eds) Tropical Peatland Eco-management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4654-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics