Skip to main content

Rural Labour Unionism in Brazil: The Transformations of the National Confederation of Farm Workers (CONTAG)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter aims to examine the transformation in rural unions as part of a broader analysis of the question of labour in Brazil today. Although some of the literature acknowledges that traditional forms of social organisation have dwindled in Brazil, trade unions—especially those representing rural workers—remain strong. This can be seen not only in the numbers but also in the influence that these unions have, both with state institutions and in international forums (Maybury-Lewis, The Politics of the Possible: The Brazilian Rural Workers’ Trade Union Movement, 1964–1985. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1994; Pereira, End of the Peasantry: The Rural Labour Movement in Northeast Brazil, 1961–1988. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997; Carvalho, A produção do transnacional: compilações da agricultura familiar e camponesa na Contag e no MPA. PPG Doctoral Thesis in the Social Sciences. Belo Horizonte, UFMG, 2018).

The union rural workers system in Brazil is comprised of a network of over 4000 affiliate unions that have been grouped under a single umbrella organisation, the National Confederation of Farm Workers (CONTAG), for the past five decades. This mammoth-like but at the same time, tightly concentrated union system has been sustained by two Brazilian legal principles. The first establishes that there can be only one union for each trade in a given geographical area (a concept known as unicidade sindical) while the second establishes “rural worker” as a general occupational category that comprises a wide range of workers and labour relations in the countryside.

The objective of this chapter is to analyse the processes associated with the construction, reinterpretations and subsequent transformations in the rural worker category in the context of union organisation in Brazil. More specifically, it sets out to examine how these transformations influenced CONTAG’s recent division between the occupational categories of the rural worker and the family farmer. The modifications to the rural worker category, in turn, led to changes in the modus operandi, union structure and political organisation of CONTAG. As a result of these adaptations, the system for the representation of rural workers from the countryside is holding steady five decades after it was originally introduced.

The aspects of this process to be explored herein include: (1) the emergence during the 1980s of new political subjects in the countryside who joined diverse social movements and demanded recognition and representation, thus revealing the limitations of the generic category of the “rural worker” and calling into question the CONTAG system’s ability to represent the collective interests of workers; (2) social transformations, a series of changes in production and economics that altered rural labour relations in Brazil, especially among wage earners; (3) a combination of these factors, which contributed to new court interpretations of the rural worker occupational category, leading, in turn, to adaptations at the organisational level among rural trade unions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is useful to note that employer associations are permitted under Brazilian law. The terms under which these associations operate are similar to those of the trade unions. According to the CNES survey from 2015, there are 5251 employer associations across Brazil.

  2. 2.

    The size of the property is limited to four times the minimum technically required to develop commercial farming. The work force has to be formed predominantly from members of the family running the business. A minimum portion of the gross family income must be generated in the farm. The law also defines as family farmers forest people, indigenous groups, quilombolas (black rural communities formed during and after slavery), small-scale fishermen and extractivists.

Bibliography

  • Aguiar, V. V. P. (2015). Somos todas margaridas: um estudo sobre o processo de constituição das mulheres do campo e da floresta como sujeitos políticos. Doctoral Thesis in the Social Sciences. Unicamp: Campinas/SP. 521 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antunes, R., & Santana, M. A. (2014). The Dilemmas of the New Unionism in Brazil: Breaks and Continuities. Latin American Perspectives, 41(5), 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, A. G. (2016). Sindicatos no Brasil: o que esperar no futuro próximo? Texto para discussão 2262. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. Brasilia: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappellin, P. (1994). Viver o sindicalismo no feminino. Revista Estudos Feministas 2 (special edition). Rio de Janeiro. CIEC/ECO/UFRJ., 1994, 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. (Ed.). (2015). Challenging Social Inequality: the landless Rural Workers Movement and Agrarian Reform in Brazil. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, P. D. (2018). A produção do transnacional: compilações da agricultura familiar e camponesa na Contag e no MPA. PPG Doctoral Thesis in the Social Sciences. Belo Horizonte, UFMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contag. (2003). CONTAG—40 anos ao lado do homem e da mulher do campo. Brasilia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contag. (2018). Report from the 12th National Congress of Rural Farm Workers and Family Farmers. Brasilia, 366 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, L. F. C. (1996). Sindicalismo rural brasileiro em construção. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Medeiros, L. S. (1989). História dos movimentos sociais no campo. Rio de Janeiro: FASE.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Medeiros, L. S.. (1995). Lavradores, trabalhadores agrícolas, camponeses: os comunistas e a constituição de classes no campo. PPG Doctoral Thesis in the Social Sciences. Campinas/SP: UNICAMP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favareto, A. (2006). Agricultores, trabalhadores: os trinta anos do novo sindicalismo rural no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 21, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favareto, A. (2007). Paradigmas do desenvolvimento rural em questão. São Paulo: Iglu: Fapesp. 220p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohn, M. da G. (2008). Abordagens teóricas no estudo dos movimentos sociais na América Latina. Caderno CRH 21(54), 439–455. Salvador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohn, M. da G. (2011). Movimentos Sociais na contemporaneidade. Revista Brasileira de Educação 16(47), 333–361. Caxambu/MG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisa, C., & Schneider, S. (2014). Três gerações de políticas públicas para a agricultura familiar e formas de interação entre sociedade e Estado no Brasil. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 52, 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maybury-Lewis, B. (1994). The Politics of the Possible: The Brazilian Rural Workers’ Trade Union Movement, 1964–1985. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, L. S. d. (1997). Trabalhadores rurais, agricultura familiar e organização sindical. São Paulo em Perspectiva, 11(2) São Paulo, 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraes Silva, M. A., Menezes, M. A., & Ribeiro, J. D. (2014). State and Regulation of Labour Relations in the Sugarcane Fields of Brazil. In T. Marsden, J. S. B. Cavalcanti, & A. Bonanno (Eds.), Labour Relations in Globalized Food (pp. 167–191). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, A. (1997). End of the Peasantry: The Rural Labour Movement in Northeast Brazil, 1961–1988. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picolotto, E. L.. (2009). A emergência dos “agricultores familiares” como sujeitos de direitos na trajetória do sindicalismo rural brasileiro. Mundo Agrário 9(18). Centro de Estudios Histórico Rurales. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Universidad Nacional de La Plata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picolotto, E. L. (2018). Union Plurality in the Field? Family Farmers and Paid Rural Workers in a Dispute Setting. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, 104, 201–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picolotto, E. L. (2018b). Pluralismo, neocorporativismo e o sindicalismo dos agricultores familiares no Brasil. Sociedade e Estado, 33(1), 85–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RICCI, R. (2009). A maior estrutura sindical do Brasil: papel do sindicalismo de trabalhadores rurais no pós-64. In B. M. Fernandes, L. S. Medeiros, & M. I. Paulilo (Eds.), Lutas camponesas contemporâneas: condições, dilemas e conquistas—a diversidade das formas das lutas no campo (Vol. 2, pp. 321–338). São Paulo/Brasília, DF: UNESP/Núcleo de Estudos Agrários e Desenvolvimento Rural (NEAD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, I. J., & Ladosky, M. H. G. (2015). Paradoxos do sindicalismo brasileiro: a CUT e os trabalhadores rurais. Lua Nova, 95, 87–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, M. C. (2015). Beyond the MST: The Impact of Brazilian Social Movements. In M. Carter (Ed.), Challenging Social Inequality: The Landless Rural Workers Movement and Agrarian Reform in Brazil. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M. J. D. (2001). Projeto alternativo de desenvolvimento rural sustentável. Estudos avançados, 15(43), 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigaud, L. (2000). A Forma Acampamento: Notas a partir da versão Pernambucana. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 58, 255–279.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Galindo, E., Rosa, M.C. (2021). Rural Labour Unionism in Brazil: The Transformations of the National Confederation of Farm Workers (CONTAG). In: Jha, P., Chambati, W., Ossome, L. (eds) Labour Questions in the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4635-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4635-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4634-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4635-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics