Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter presents an introduction to systems thinking. While there are many approaches to systems thinking in different fields of studies and business, in this book, we focus on some models and theories commonly used in the field of social studies, including education. Many people think that theories and models are boring. If you agree, then think again. Yes, you’re right—both times. While theories and models may be boring, however, they are important foundational knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2rd edn., Vol. 3, pp. 3–44). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (2001). Soft systems methodology in action: Participative creation of an information strategy for an acute hospital. In J. Rosenhead & J. Mingers (Eds.), Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: Problem structuring methods for complexity (p. 91113). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Schole, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khisty, C. J. (1995). Soft-systems methodology as learning and management tool. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 121(3), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(1995)121:3(91).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, C., Pels, J., & Polese, F. (2010). A brief review of systems theories and their managerial applications. Service Science, 2(1–2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2.1_2.126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness and the development of process indicators of school functioning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345900010106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senior, B. (1997). Organisational change. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senior, B., & Fleming, J. (2006). Organisational change (3rd ed.). New York: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. (2002). Complex acts of knowing: Paradox and descriptive self-awareness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210424639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 18(11): 68–76, 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1984). General system theory. New York: Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gonzales, M. (2020). Theories and Models in Systems Thinking. In: Systems Thinking for Supporting Students with Special Needs and Disabilities. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4558-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4558-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4557-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4558-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics