Skip to main content

How Vigilant Is the Vibrant Civil Society?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Civil Society in Bangladesh

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 46))

  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter, based on empirical survey data, investigates the nature and trends of civil society, focusing on their resources, behaviors, relations, nature of activities, etc. The survey data reveal rich involvement of civil society in grass-roots actions while indicating their low participation in politics and state related affairs. This means that civil society organizations are vibrant in grass-roots social services. However, they lack the necessary participatory attributes for proper interest articulation and monitoring of the state, resulting in a less vigilant civil society. Data based analysis accelerates the mainstream argument of the book that civil society in Bangladesh may be noteworthy for its contributions to the development and social welfare but it can hardly contribute to democracy.

Some sections of this chapter are derived in part from an article by the author, titled How Vigilant is the Vibrant Civil Society in Bangladesh? A Survey-based Analysis, published in Journal of Civil Society in 8(2), 155–183, June 2012, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2012.726548.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In further analysis of the activities and nature of participation of civil society, these 13 categories have been compressed into four broad categories: economic, education and culture, pressure group, and welfare and development. Under Economic heading, all CSOs that have identified themselves as economic organization, agriculture organization, and labor unions and also CSOs in the other categories. This is because economic and labor groups are related to industry and business and micro-credit, the farmers organization are also cooperatives concerned with loan and micro-credit, again the 5 CSOs that have selected the other options identified them as either micro-credit groups or business and income related groups. Under the heading of Education and Culture all the CSOs that have identified them as education and research groups, cultural organizations, religious organization, and recreational and sports organizations shall be brought together. All CSOs that think they are government or administration related organization, professional groups and citizen’s group have been named together as Pressure group. Lastly, all the social welfare groups and NGOs have been brought under the heading Welfare and Development group.

  2. 2.

    This booklet provides the rules for providing financial grant and loan to the voluntary social welfare organizations and cooperatives that were followed in 2006. This amount has increased in the last one decade.

  3. 3.

    Respondents were asked in the questionnaire, “when a policy related problem or an incident occurs in the geographic area where your organization is active, how much influence your organization has in resolving these problems? Please rate your influence from 1 to 5 where (1) No influence, (2) Hardly any influence, (3) Little influence, (4) Some influence, and (5) Strong influence.”

  4. 4.

    The confronting political parties prefer to engage on the streets instead of air their grievances at the parliament. Often the street politics, mass protests, etc., are accompanied by day-long nationwide strikes instigated by violence which is known as Hartal.

  5. 5.

    In Bangladesh, although the Supreme Court is independent from the government, lower divisions of the court are still controlled by government-recruited magistrates. This issue is long-standing, and the political parties always promise in their election campaigns to separate the judiciary from the government. However, no such separation has actually taken place under either regime. The Supreme Court has ruled on this issue and in 2007, under the emergency rule, the separation process began.

References

  • Ahmed, M., & Jahan, R. (2002). Investing in ourselves: Giving and fundraising in Bangladesh. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, R. (1997). Development strategies and socio-demographic impact of non-governmental organizations: Evidence from rural Bangladesh. Dhaka: University Press Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (Eds.). (1997). NGOs, states and donors. Hampshire: Palgrave in Association with the Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOB (Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs). (1998). Bangladesh: Evaluation of Netherlands funded NGOs, 1972-1996. The Hague: Policy and Operations Evaluation Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Social Welfare. (2002). Rules for distributing grant to voluntary organizations 2002 (Shecha shebi protistaner modhe onudan bitoron nitimala 2002). Bangladesh National Association for Social Welfare. Dhaka: Ministry of Social Welfare, Government of Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: Collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasnim, F. (2005). The role of Japanese NGOs in strengthening Civil Society of Bangladesh: A case study of Shapla Neer. International Political Economy, 16, 19–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsujinaka, Y., Choe, J.-Y., Ohtomo, T., & Miwa H. (2006). Which civil society organizations in which countries are enjoying policy-making processes and why: Comparing 7 countries (Japan, South Korea, Germany, China, Turkey, Russia, and the Philippines) in JIGS Survey, in Paper presented at the 20th International Political Science Association World Congress, Fukuoka, Japan, July 9–13, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsujinaka, Y. (2002). Nihon shimin shakai riekidantai (Civil Society and Interest Groups of Modern Japan) (Written in Japanese). Tokyo: Bakutakusya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah, A. K. M., & Routary, J. K. (2003). NGOs and development: Alleviating rural poverty in Bangladesh. Guerra: Book Mark International.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tasnim, F. (2021). How Vigilant Is the Vibrant Civil Society?. In: Civil Society in Bangladesh . New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 46. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4404-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics