Skip to main content

Geographical Locations and Market Efficiency of Listed Companies—Analysis Based on the Chinese Market

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
IEIS 2020
  • 195 Accesses

Abstract

Several researches on behavioral finance indicate that the geographical locations of listed companies can affect investors’ behaviors, return on investment or stock prices. Based on what has been achieved, this article studies whether the geographical locations of listed companies affect the weak-form market efficiency defined by Fama (J Finan 25(2):383-417, 1970 [1]). This article selects geographical and historical data of more than 1000 stocks traded on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges between 2009 and 2018 and analyzes this issue by defining three financial centers and eight central cities and using the ADF test and variance ratio test. The test results show that the closer a listed company is to a financial center (or a central city), the more likely that its share price performance tends to conform to the weak-form efficient market hypothesis. On the contrary, the farther away a listed company is from a financial center (or a central city), the more likely that its share price performance tends to deviate from the weak-form efficient market hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basu, S. (1977). Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price—Earnings ratios: A test of the efficient market hypothesis. The Journal of Finance, 32(3), 663–682.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rozeff, M. S., & Kinney, W. (1976). Capital market seasonality: The case of stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Bondt, W. F. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1985). Does the stock market over-react. The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793–805.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goetzmann, W. N., & Kumar, A. (2008). Equity portfolio diversification. Review of Finance, 12(3), 433–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coval, J. D., & Moskowitz, T. J. (1999). Home bias at home: local equity preference in domestic portfolios. Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2045–2073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coval, J. D., & Moskowitz, T. J. (2001). The geography of investment: informed trading and asset prices. Journal of Political Economy, 109(4), 811–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Malloy, C. J. (2005). The geography of equity analysis. The Journal of Finance, 60(2), 719–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Christoffersen, S. E. K., & Sarkissian, S. (2009). City size and fund performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(2), 252–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anand, A., Gatchev, V. A., Madureira, L., et al. (2011). Geographic proximity and price discovery: Evidence from Nasdaq. Journal of Financial Markets, 14(2), 193–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cuiling, Y. (2017). Company Geography, Investor Sentiment and Stock Return. Chongqing University.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Loughran, T. (2007). Geographic dissemination of information. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 675–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jingmei, Z., Fengyun, W., & Mei, L. (2012). Empirical research on local preferences and regional avoidance in investment decisions. Investment Research, 31(01), 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xiaosong, Y. (2018). Empirical Analysis of the Existence, Factors of Influence and Consequences of Local Preferences of Venture Capital Institutions. Shanghai Normal University.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lo, A. W., & Mackinlay, A. C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bowen Pan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ren, Y., Pan, B., Wang, C., Yan, R., Zhang, M. (2021). Geographical Locations and Market Efficiency of Listed Companies—Analysis Based on the Chinese Market. In: Li, M., Bohács, G., Hua, G., Gong, D., Shang, X. (eds) IEIS 2020. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4363-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics