Skip to main content

Adopting Shop Floor Digitalization in Indian Manufacturing SMEs—A Transformational Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Industrial and Production Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to enumerate a study of the transformation of a brownfield manufacturing facility producing Electro-Mechanical Devices (EMD). Essentially this study can be termed as a testimonial for “Digitalize and Transform” initiative. A Production Digital Twin was developed leveraging the IIoT ready shop floor and adopting appropriate digital technologies. The proven DES model and digital twin methodology can be leveraged for future simulations to support market variability. Discrete Event Simulation (DES) method was deployed to create digital models of the shop floor resources and their interplay to help explore the plant characteristics and optimize its performance. The digital simulation model was integrated with the shop floor IIoT framework in a closed-loop, to run experiments and what-if scenarios with variable input parameters. Using this setup, physical shop floor and the digital simulation model share operational data in a continuous closed-loop to provide decision support for improving plant operations. EDM manufacturer’s target was to set up a re-usable DES model to arrive at actionable insights those can help them improve assembly line performance and get ready for the variable demand and product variants that subsequently would help them in driving business and profitability. Significant improvements were realized across all operational indicators—efficiency, quality, productivity and flexibility. Manufacturing SMEs across India are implementing IIoT and data analytics with the objective of acquiring real-time data thus enabling quick and accurate decision making. The closed-loop discrete event simulation methodology has the potential of enhancing IIoT investments further. Especially in the post-COVID scenario, when manufacturers are challenged with disrupted supply-chain, inconsistent demand and manpower shortages, this methodology can help execute shop-floor plans efficiently with optimum resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akpan, I.J., Brooks, R.J.: Experimental evaluation of user performance on two-dimensional and three-dimensional perspective displays in discrete-event simulation. Decis. Support Syst. 64, 14–30 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arcidiacono, F., Ancarani, A., Di Mauro, C., Schupp, F.: Where the rubber meets the road. Industry 4.0 among SMEs in the automotive sector. IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 47(4), 86–93 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barlas, P., Heavey, C.: Automation of input data to discrete event simulation for manufacturing: a review. Int. J. Model. Simul. Sci. Comput. 7(01), 1630001 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyes, H., Hallaq, B., Cunningham, J., Watson, T.: The industrial internet of things (IIoT): an analysis framework. Comput. Ind. 101, 1–12 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Y.: Integrated and intelligent manufacturing: perspectives and enablers. Engineering 3(5), 588–595 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalenogare, L.S., Benitez, G.B., Ayala, N.F., Frank, A.G.: The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 204, 383–394 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, J., Edgar, T., Porter, J., Bernaden, J., Sarli, M.: Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance. Comput. Chem. Eng. 47, 145–156 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Durocher, D.B., Sprinkle, L.: Experiences of a global electrical manufacturing enterprise: the journey to become industry 4.0 ready (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dutta, G., Kumar, R., Sindhwani, R., Singh, R.K.: Digital transformation priorities of India’s discrete manufacturing SMEs–a conceptual study in perspective of Industry 4.0. Competitive. Rev. Int. Bus. J. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Furtado, V., Kolaja, T., Mueller, C., Salguero, J.: Managing a Manufacturing Plant Through the Coronavirus Crisis. Mckinsey & Company Operations Practice article (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gehrke, I., Schauss, M., Küsters, D., Gries, T.: Experiencing the potential of closed-loop PLM systems enabled by industrial internet of things. Procedia Manuf. 45, 177–182 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo, J., Zhao, N., Sun, L., Zhang, S.: Modular based flexible digital twin for factory design. J. Amb. Intell. Human. Comput. 10(3), 1189–1200 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Iiotworld article, 3 Practical Ways to Transform Brownfield Plants into Digital Factories. Available at: https://iiot-world.com/industrial-iot/connected-industry/3-practical-ways-to-transform-brownfield-plants-into-digital-factories/. Accessed at 4th July, 2020 2:09 PM IST

  14. Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., Dolgui, A.: Introduction to scheduling in industry 4.0 and cloud manufacturing systems. In: Scheduling in Industry 4.0 and Cloud Manufacturing, pp. 1–9. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jung, K., Morris, K.C., Lyons, K.W., Leong, S., Cho, H.: Mapping strategic goals and operational performance metrics for smart manufacturing systems (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, S., Park, S.: CPS (cyber physical system) based manufacturing system optimization. Procedia Comput. Sci. 122, 518–524 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, Y.T.T., Riddick, F.H., Johansson, B.J.I.: Core manufacturing simulation data–a manufacturing simulation integration standard: overview and case studies. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 24(8), 689–709 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, L., Chang, Q., Ni, J.: Data driven bottleneck detection of manufacturing systems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 47(18), 5019–5036 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Monek, G., Szántó, N., Jósvai, J., István, S.: The role of simulation in a cyber-physical production environment. Simulation in Produktion und Logistik (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Negri, E., Fumagalli, L., Macchi, M.: A review of the roles of digital twin in cps-based production systems. Procedia Manuf. 11, 939–948 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prajapat, N., Tiwari, A.: A review of assembly optimisation applications using discrete event simulation. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 30(2–3), 215–228 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pundir, A.K., Devpriya, J., Chakraborty, M., Ganpathy, L.: Technology integration for improved performance: a case study in digitization of supply chain with integration of Internet of Things and blockchain technology. In: 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), pp. 0170–0176. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rungtusanatham, M.J., Salvador, F.: From mass production to mass customization: hindrance factors, structural inertia, and transition hazard. Prod. Oper. Manage. 17(3), 385–396 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schleich, B., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L., Wartzack, S.: Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Ann. 66(1), 141–144 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Semini, M., Fauske, H., Strandhagen, J.O.: Applications of discrete-event simulation to support manufacturing logistics decision-making: a survey. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1946–1953. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sjödin, D.R., Parida, V., Leksell, M., Petrovic, A.: Smart factory implementation and process innovation: a preliminary maturity model for leveraging digitalization in manufacturing moving to smart factories presents specific challenges that can be addressed through a structured approach focused on people, processes, and technologies. Res. Technol. Manag. 61(5), 22–31 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Strauß, P., Schmitz, M., Wöstmann, R., Deuse, J.: Enabling of predictive maintenance in the brownfield through low-cost sensors, an IIoT-architecture and machine learning. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 1474–1483. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Uden, L., He, W.: How the Internet of Things can help knowledge management: a case study from the automotive domain. J. Knowl. Manag. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Uhlemann, T.H.J., Lehmann, C., Steinhilper, R.: The digital twin: realizing the cyber-physical production system for industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp 61, 335–340 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. van Beek, D.A., Gordijn, S.H.F., Rooda, J.E.: Integrating continuous-time and discrete-event concepts in modelling and simulation of manufacturing machines. Simul. Pract. Theory 5(7–8), 653–669 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vares, H., Parvandi, Y., Ghasemi, R., Abdullahi, B.: Transition from an efficiency-driven economy to innovation-driven: a secondary analysis of countries global competitiveness. Eur. J. Econ. Finan. Admin. Sci. 31, 124–132 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, Y., Ma, H.S., Yang, J.H., Wang, K.S.: Industry 4.0: a way from mass customization to mass personalization production. Adv. Manuf. 5(4), 311–320 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xu, L.D., Xu, E.L., Li, L.: Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56(8), 2941–2962 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zawadzki, P., Żywicki, K.: Smart product design and production control for effective mass customization in the Industry 4.0 concept. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhuang, C., Liu, J., Xiong, H.: Digital twin-based smart production management and control framework for the complex product assembly shop-floor. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 96(1–4), 1149–1163 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gautam Dutta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dutta, G., Kumar, R., Sindhwani, R., Singh, R. (2021). Adopting Shop Floor Digitalization in Indian Manufacturing SMEs—A Transformational Study. In: Phanden, R.K., Mathiyazhagan, K., Kumar, R., Paulo Davim, J. (eds) Advances in Industrial and Production Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4320-7_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4320-7_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4319-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4320-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics