Skip to main content

Introduction: A Scene on a Train

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Platform Urbanism

Part of the book series: Geographies of Media ((GOM))

Abstract

This chapter offers an experiential introduction to the problematic of platform urbanism, reflecting the widespread integration of platform services and ecosystems within the everyday materiality of the city. With a pivot towards platforms evident across diverse literatures of platform studies, platform economics, platform surveillance and platform capitalism, ‘the platform’ has become an increasingly vital lens through which to tackle challenges associated with internet of things (IoT), connected infrastructures, artificial intelligence, social media, the sharing economy and the future of work. This chapter introduces my approach to navigating an increasingly platform-ed urbanism, which has seen digital platforms, and their underlying logics, become more and more integrated within the fine-grain of cities, in ways that are as much conceptual as they are computational. This approach informs a set of expositions throughout the book on the genealogies of platforms and platform-thinking, touching on elements of media and internet studies, smart cities, urban informatics, cybernetics and software studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While Guglielmo Marconi is often attributed as the inventor of radio technology, there are many other inventors, physicists and engineers who contributed to our understanding of radio communications. Nikolai Tesla is one inventor whose neglected role in its development is now being corrected. Another is Sir Ernest Rutherford, the New Zealand born physicist who built a magnetic detector capable of transmitting wireless signals while a student at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, in 1896. For more on the history of radio, see Gardiol, F. (2011). About the beginnings of wireless. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies, 1–8, Marvin, C. (1988a). When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century. New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press, and Sterne J. (2004). The Audible Past: The Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction. Durham and London, Duke University Press. as examples.

References

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, M. (2009). Privacy, Digital Exploitation, and the Digital Enclosure. Amsterdam Law Forum, 1(4), 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, J., Kitchin, R., & Leszczynski, A. (2016). Digital Turn, Digital Geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, J., Kitchin, R., & Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital Turn, Digital Geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barns, S. (2014). Platform Urbanism: The Emerging Politics of Open Data for Urban Management. American Association of Geographers Annual Conference, Tampa, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barns, S. (2016). Visions of Urban Informatics: From Proximate Futures to Data-Driven Urbanism. Fibreculture Journal, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barns, S. (2019a). Responsive Listening: Negotiating Cities of Sirens, Smartphones and Sensors. In M. Droumeva & R. Jordan (Eds.), Sound, Media, Ecology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barns, S. (2019b, July). Negotiating the Platform Pivot: From Participatory Digital Ecosystems to Infrastructures of Everyday Life. Geography Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12464.

  • Barr, T. (2000). New Media: The Changing Face of Australia’s Media and Telecommunications. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisell, D. (2018). Transit Life: How Commuting Is Transforming Our Cities (Urban and Industrial Environments). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosland, J. (2008). Regulating for Local Content in the Digital Audiovisual Environment. Melbourne Law School Research Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, M. C. (1996a). The City of Collective Memory, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, M. C. (1996b). Cyber Cities: Visual Perception in the Age of Electronic Communication. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choksi, M., & Fujiu, R. (2016). Behind the Wheel. Available from: https://www.uber.com/en-AU/newsroom/behind-the-wheel/. Accessed 6 June 2016.

  • Choudary, S. P. (2015). Platform Scale: How an Emerging Business Model Helps Startups Build Large Empires with Minimum Investment. Boston, MA: Platform Thinking Labs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudary, S. P. (2019). Country as a Platform: Why Singapore’s Future Needs a Platform Strategy. Available from: http://platformed.info/country-as-a-platform-why-singapores-future-needs-a-platform-strategy/.

  • Church, Z. (2017). Platform Strategy, Explained. In MIT (Ed.), MIT Management Sloane School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J., et al. (2014). Participations: Dialogues on the Participatory Promise of Contemporary Culture and Politics. International Journal of Communication, 8(2014), 1446–1473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. (1999). Modern Times Modern Places. Gardeners Book: Lodnon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, J., Bailey, J., & Moran, A. (Eds.). (1995). Public Voices, Private Interests: Australia’s Media Policy. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crang, M., & Graham, S. (2007). Sentient Cities: Ambient Intelligence and the Politics of Urban Space. Information, Communication & Society, 10, 789–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, K. (2009). Following You: Disciplines of Listening in Social Media. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 23(4), 525–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, S., & Goldsmith, S. (2014). The Responsive City: Engaging Communities Through Data-Smart Governance. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crommelin, L., Troy, L., Martin, C., & Pettit, C. (2018). Is Airbnb a Sharing Economy Superstar? Evidence from Five Global Cities AU—Crommelin, Laura. Urban Policy and Research, 36, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, A. (2015). A 100 Smart Cities, a 100 Utopias. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5, 49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, A. (2019). Postcolonial Urban Futures: Imagining and Governing India’s Smart Urban Age. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37, 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2004). Flying Through Code/Space: The Real Virtuality of Air Travel. Environment and Planning A, 36, 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dommett, K., & Temple, L. (2018). Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns. Parliamentary Affairs, 71, 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donders, K., Pauwels, C., & Loisen, J. (2012). Introduction: All or Nothing? From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media, to Public Service ‘Anything’? International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 8, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, T. (2017). The ‘Theory’ in Media Theory: The ‘Media-Centrism’ Debate. Media Theory, 1, 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, H., & Graham, M. (2016). Semantic Cities: Coded Geopolitics and the Rise of the Semantic Web. In R. Kitchin & S. Y. Perng (Eds.), Code and the City. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foth, M., Forlano, L., Satchell, S., & Gibbs, M. (Eds.). (2008). From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Hereotopias. Architecture/Mouvement/Continuité.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T. (2014). The Relevance of Algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T., & Ananny, M. (2016). Exceptional Platforms. The Internet, Politics and Policy Conference, Oxford University, Oxford Internet Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitelman, A. (2006). Always Already New: Media, History and the Data of Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazebrook, G., & Newman, P. (2018). The City of the Future. Urban Planning, 3, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorwa, R. (2019). What Is Platform Governance? Information. Communication & Society, 22, 854–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, A., & Kavanagh, L. J. (Eds.). (2006). Crossover: Architecture, Urbanism and Technology. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M., Hjorth, L., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital Labour and Development: Impacts of Global Digital Labour Platforms and the Gig Economy on Worker Livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23, 135–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2005). Software-Sorted Geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 562–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, A., & Kim, N. (2013). Against the Smart City (The City Is Here for You to Use). New York: Do Projects. Amazon Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, A., & Shepard, M. (2007). Urban Computing and Its Discontents. New York: The Architectural League of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, O. (2015). Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason since 1945. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. (2008). The Street as Platform. City of Sound. Available from: https://www.cityofsound.com/blog/2008/02/the-street-as-p.html. Accessed 8 February 2008.

  • Iveson, K. (2007). Publics and the City. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism: Or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 59–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A. J., Brown, A., Nelson, M., Ehrenfeucht, R., Holman, N., Gurran, N., et al. (2019). Planning and the So-Called ‘Sharing’ Economy/ Can Shared Mobility Deliver Equity?/ The Sharing Economy and the Ongoing Dilemma about How to Plan for Informality/ Regulating Platform Economies in Cities—Disrupting the Disruption?/ Regulatory Combat? How the ‘Sharing Economy’ is Disrupting Planning Practice/ Corporatised Enforcement: Challenges of Regulating AirBnB and Other Platform Economies/ Nurturing a Generative Sharing Economy for Local Public Goods and Service Provision. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(2), 261–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. (2014a). The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures & Their Consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. (2014b). The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism. GeoJournal, 79, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. (2015). Making Sense of Smart Cities: Addressing Present Shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8, 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking Critically About and Researching Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T. P., & McArdle, G. (2015). Smart Cities and the Politics of Urban Data. In S. Marvin, A. Luque-Ayala, & F. McFarlane (Eds.), Smart Urbanism: Utopian Vision or False Dawn? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kracauer, S. (1995). The Mass Ornament: Weimar Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajina, Z., & Robertson, D. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge Companion to Urban Media and Communication. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M.-P. (2016). Algorithmic Geographies: Big Data, Algorithmic Uncertainty, and the Production of Geographic Knowledge. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106, 274–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2017). Platform Capitalism: The Intermediation and Capitalization of Digital Economic Circulation. Finance and Society, 2, 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford and Carlton: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre Gonzalez, C. (2013). Restoring Historical Understandings of the “Public Interest” Standard of American Broadcasting: An Exploration of the Fairness Doctrine. International Journal of Communication, 7, 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leszczynski, A. (2015). Spatial Big Data and Anxieties of Control. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33, 965–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leszczynski, A. (2016). Speculative Futures: Cities, Data, and Governance Beyond Smart Urbanism. Environment and Planning A, Epub ahead of print 22 May 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leszczynski, A. (2019). Glitchy Vignettes of Platform Urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819878721.

  • Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2011). Media Regulation: Governance and the Interest of Citizens and Consumers. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luque-Ayala, A., & Marvin, S. (2015). Developing a Critical Understanding of Smart Urbanism? Urban Studies, 52, 2105–2116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannovich, L. (2006). The Poetics of Augmented Space: Learning from Prada. Visual Communication, 5, 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marvin, C. (1988). When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, A. (2002). Mapping Modernity: Utopia and Communication Networks. In D. Cosgrove (Ed.), Mapping (2nd ed.). London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, A., & Mattelart, M. (1998). Theories of Communication: A Short Introduction. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattern, S. (2008). Silent, Invisible City: Mediating Urban Experience for the Other Senses. In F. Eckardt, J. Geelhaar, L. Colini, K. Willis, K. Chorianopolous, & R. Hennig (Eds.), Media City: Situations, Practices, Encounters. Berlin: Frank & Timme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattern, S. (2017). Code and Clay, Data and Dirt: Five Thousand Years of Urban Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. (2013). Ambient Commons: Attention in the Age of Embodied Information. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (2015). Global Firms and Smart Technologies: IBM and the Reduction of Cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40, 562–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuire, S. (2008). The Media City: Media Architecture and Urban Space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. (1996). The City of Bits: Place, Space and the Info-Bahn. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrine, R. (1994). Politics and the Mass Media in Britain. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., Davies-Slate, S., & Jones, E. (2017). The Entrepreneur Rail Model: Funding Urban Rail Through Majority Private Investment in Urban Regeneration. Research in Transportation Economics, 67, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olma, S. (2014). Never Mind the Sharing Economy: Here’s Platform Capitalism. Network Cultures. Available from: http://networkcultures.org/mycreativity/2014/10/16/never-mind-the-sharing-economy-heres-platform-capitalism/. Accessed 16 October 2014.

  • Pasquale, F. (2015a). The Algorithmic Self. The Hedgehog Review, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2016). Infrastructure Studies Meet Platform Studies in the Age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollio, A. (2016). Technologies of Austerity Urbanism: The “Smart City” Agenda in Italy (2011–2013). Urban Geography, 37, 514–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollio, A. (2019, forthcoming). Forefronts of the Sharing Economy: Uber in Cape Town. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raetzsch, C., Pereira, G., Vestergaard, L. S., & Brynskov, M. (2019). Weaving Seams with Data: Conceptualizing City APIs as Elements of Infrastructures. Big Data & Society, 6, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, S., & Moore, S. (2018). Platform Urbanism Mediapolis Roundtable. Mediapolis. Available from: http://www.mediapolisjournal.com/roundtables/platformurbanism/.

  • Rose, G. (2015). Rethinking the Geographies of Cultural ‘Objects’ Through Digital Technologies: Interface, Network and Friction. Progress in Human Geography, 40, 334–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, W. D. (1997). The Meaning of “the Public Interest” in Communications Policy—Part II: Its Implementation in Early Broadcast Law and Regulation. Communication Law and Policy, 2, 363–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadowski, J. (2019, June). When Data is Capital: Datafication, Accumulation, and Extraction. Big Data and Society, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadowski, J., & Bendor, R. (2019). Selling Smartness: Corporate Narratives and the Smart City as a Sociotechnical Imaginary. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44, 540–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2000). The Global City: Strategic Site/New Frontier. American Studies, 41, 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, T. (2016). Platform Cooperativism: Challenging the Corporate Sharing Economy. New York City: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, F. (2016). Outlaw Territories: Environments of Insecurity/Architectures of Counterinsurgency. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1994). Flesh and Stone: The Body and the City in Western Civilisation. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The ‘Actually Existing Smart City’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8, 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, O., Paasche, T., & Klauser, F. (2014). Smart Cities as Corporate Storytelling. City, 18, 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S., & Ruhleder, K. (1996, March). Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, J. (2004). The Audible Past: The Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumartojo, S., Pink, S., Dupton, D., & Labond, C. H. (2016). The Affective Intensities of Datafied Space. Emotion, Space and Society, 21, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A. (2013). Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gar: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Princeton: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62, 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Ourselves. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Graaf, S., & Ballon, P. (2018). Navigating Platform Urbanism. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 346–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data Between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12, 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, J., Poell, J., & De Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform Labor: On the Gendered and Racialized Exploitation of Low-Income Service Work in the ‘On-Demand’ Economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 898–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, N. (2019, October 29). On Platform Urbanism and Airbnb Citizenship. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444819884377.

  • Vecchi, B., & Numerico, T. (2016). Geert Lovink: ‘Stop Using Gmail’. Available from: https://global.ilmanifesto.it/geert-lovink-stop-using-gmail/. Accessed 3 March 2016.

  • Vidler, A. (2008). Histories of the Immediate Present: Inventing Architectural Modernism. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wachsmuth, D., & Weisler, A. (2018). Airbnb and the Rent Gap: Gentrification Through the Sharing Economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(6), 1147–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18778038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilken, R. (2011). Teletechnologies, Place, and Community. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2018). Stand Out of Our Light: Freedom and Resistance in the Attention Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. M., & Monahan, T. (2019). Platform Surveillance: Editorial. Surveillance and Society, 17, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. (2016). The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads. New York: Alfrad A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barns, S. (2020). Introduction: A Scene on a Train. In: Platform Urbanism. Geographies of Media. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9725-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9725-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9724-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9725-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics