Skip to main content

Phenotype Network and Brain Structural Covariance Network of Anxiety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Anxiety Disorders

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 1191))

Abstract

Network-based approach for psychological phenotypes assumes the dynamical interactions among the psychiatric symptoms, psychological characteristics, and neurocognitive performances arise, as they coexist, propagate, and inhibit other components within the network of mental phenomena. For differential types of dataset from which the phenotype network is to be estimated, a Gaussian graphical model, an Ising model, a directed acyclic graph, or an intraindividual covariance network could be used. Accordingly, these network-based approaches for anxiety-related psychological phenomena have been helpful in quantitative and pictorial understanding of qualitative dynamics among the diverse psychological phenomena as well as mind-environment interactions. Brain structural covariance refers to the correlative patterns of diverse brain morphological features among differential brain regions comprising the brain, as calculated per participant or across the participants. These covarying patterns of brain morphology partly overlap with longitudinal patterns of brain cortical maturation and also with propagating pattern of brain morphological changes such as cortical thinning and brain volume reduction in patients diagnosed with neurologic or psychiatric disorders along the trajectory of disease progression. Previous studies that used the brain structural covariance network could show neural correlates of specific anxiety disorder such as panic disorder and also elucidate the neural underpinning of anxiety symptom severity in diverse psychiatric and neurologic disorder patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hyett MP, McEvoy PM. Social anxiety disorder: looking back and moving forward. Psychol Med. 2018;48(12):1937–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frank B, Jacobson NC, Hurley L, McKay D. A theoretical and empirical modeling of anxiety integrated with RDoC and temporal dynamics. J Anxiety Disord. 2017;51:39–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Borsboom D. A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):5–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fried EI, van Borkulo CD, Cramer AO, Boschloo L, Schoevers RA, Borsboom D. Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017;52(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Epskamp S, Fried EI. A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychol Methods. 2018;23(4):617–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Borkulo CD, Borsboom D, Epskamp S, Blanken TF, Boschloo L, Schoevers RA, et al. A new method for constructing networks from binary data. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5918.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McNally RJ, Mair P, Mugno BL, Riemann BC. Co-morbid obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression: a Bayesian network approach. Psychol Med. 2017;47(7):1204–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yun JY, Choi Y, Kwon Y, Lee HY, Choi SH, Jang JH. Hubness of strategic planning and sociality influences depressive mood and anxiety in College Population. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17856.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McElroy E, Patalay P. In search of disorders: internalizing symptom networks in a large clinical sample. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019;60(8):897–906.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chorpita BF, Yim L, Moffitt C, Umemoto LA, Francis SE. Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: a revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behav Res Ther. 2000;38(8):835–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tremblay RE, Vitaro F, Gagnon C, Piché C, Royer N. A prosocial scale for the preschool behaviour questionnaire: concurrent and predictive correlates. Int J Behav Dev. 1992;15(2):227–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rouquette A, Pingault JB, Fried EI, Orri M, Falissard B, Kossakowski JJ, et al. Emotional and behavioral symptom network structure in elementary school girls and association with anxiety disorders and depression in adolescence and early adulthood: a network analysis. JAMA Psychiat. 2018;75(11):1173–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spielberger DC. State-trait anxiety inventory. In: Weiner IB, Craighead WE, editors. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fairburn CG, Beglin SJ. Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire? Int J Eat Disord. 1994;16(4):363–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith KE, Mason TB, Crosby RD, Cao L, Leonard RC, Wetterneck CT, et al. A comparative network analysis of eating disorder psychopathology and co-occurring depression and anxiety symptoms before and after treatment. Psychol Med. 2019;49(2):314–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Borgatti SP. Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Comput Math Organ Theory. 2006;12(1):21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eysenck HJ. Cicero and the state-trait theory of anxiety: another case of delayed recognition. Am Psychol. 1983;38(1):114–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heeren A, Bernstein EE, McNally RJ. Deconstructing trait anxiety: a network perspective. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018;31(3):262–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nunez D, Fresno A, van Borkulo CD, Courtet P, Arias V, Garrido V, et al. Examining relationships between psychotic experiences and suicidal ideation in adolescents using a network approach. Schizophr Res. 2018;201:54–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yun JY, Kim KH, Joo GJ, Kim BN, Roh MS, Shin MS. Changing characteristics of the empathic communication network after empathy-enhancement program for medical students. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15092.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rush AJ, Gullion CM, Basco MR, Jarrett RB, Trivedi MH. The inventory of depressive symptomatology (IDS): psychometric properties. Psychol Med. 1996;26(3):477–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Capra C, Kavanagh DJ, Hides L, Scott J. Brief screening for psychosis-like experiences. Schizophr Res. 2013;149(1–3):104–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu CC, Tien YJ, Chen CH, Chiu YN, Chien YL, Hsieh MH, et al. Development of a brief self-report questionnaire for screening putative pre-psychotic states. Schizophr Res. 2013;143(1):32–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, et al. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1266–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Moffa G, Catone G, Kuipers J, Kuipers E, Freeman D, Marwaha S, et al. Using directed acyclic graphs in epidemiological research in psychosis: an analysis of the role of bullying in psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2017;43(6):1273–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuipers J, Moffa G, Kuipers E, Freeman D, Bebbington P. Links between psychotic and neurotic symptoms in the general population: an analysis of longitudinal British National Survey data using Directed Acyclic Graphs. Psychol Med. 2019;49(3):388–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yun JY, Shim G, Jeong B. Verbal abuse related to self-esteem damage and unjust blame harms mental health and social interaction in college population. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Friedman N, Murphy K, Russell S. Learning the structure of dynamic probabilistic networks. Proceedings of the fourteenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence; Madison, Wisconsin 2074111: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc; 1998. p. 139–47.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tsuruta M, Takahashi T, Tokunaga M, Iwasaki M, Kataoka S, Kakuta S, et al. Relationships between pathologic subjective halitosis, olfactory reference syndrome, and social anxiety in young Japanese women. BMC Psychol. 2017;5(1):7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Khundrakpam BS, Lewis JD, Reid A, Karama S, Zhao L, Chouinard-Decorte F, et al. Imaging structural covariance in the development of intelligence. NeuroImage. 2017;144(Pt A):227–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharda M, Foster NEV, Tryfon A, Doyle-Thomas KAR, Ouimet T, Anagnostou E, et al. Language ability predicts cortical structure and covariance in boys with autism spectrum disorder. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(3):1849–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chou KH, Lin WC, Lee PL, Tsai NW, Huang YC, Chen HL, et al. Structural covariance networks of striatum subdivision in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(4):1567–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nosarti C, Mechelli A, Herrera A, Walshe M, Shergill SS, Murray RM, et al. Structural covariance in the cortex of very preterm adolescents: a voxel-based morphometry study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011;32(10):1615–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Das T, Borgwardt S, Hauke DJ, Harrisberger F, Lang UE, Riecher-Rossler A, et al. Disorganized gyrification network properties during the transition to psychosis. JAMA Psychiat. 2018;75(6):613–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ma Z, Zhang N. Cross-population myelination covariance of human cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38(9):4730–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Yun JY, Kim SN, Lee TY, Chon MW, Kwon JS. Individualized covariance profile of cortical morphology for auditory hallucinations in first-episode psychosis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37(3):1051–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Alexander-Bloch A, Raznahan A, Bullmore E, Giedd J. The convergence of maturational change and structural covariance in human cortical networks. J Neurosci. 2013;33(7):2889–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Geng X, Li G, Lu Z, Gao W, Wang L, Shen D, et al. Structural and maturational covariance in early childhood brain development. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(3):1795–807.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shaw DJ, Marecek R, Grosbras MH, Leonard G, Pike GB, Paus T. Co-ordinated structural and functional covariance in the adolescent brain underlies face processing performance. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016;11(4):556–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sandini C, Zoller D, Scariati E, Padula MC, Schneider M, Schaer M, et al. Development of structural covariance from childhood to adolescence: a longitudinal study in 22q11.2DS. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:327.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Khundrakpam BS, Lewis JD, Jeon S, Kostopoulos P, Itturia Medina Y, Chouinard-Decorte F, et al. Exploring individual brain variability during development based on patterns of maturational coupling of cortical thickness: a longitudinal MRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2017;29(1):178–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Voevodskaya O, Pereira JB, Volpe G, Lindberg O, Stomrud E, van Westen D, et al. Altered structural network organization in cognitively normal individuals with amyloid pathology. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;64:15–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Oosterwijk CS, Vriend C, Berendse HW, van der Werf YD, van den Heuvel OA. Anxiety in Parkinson’s disease is associated with reduced structural covariance of the striatum. J Affect Disord. 2018;240:113–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Guo S, Palaniyappan L, Liddle PF, Feng J. Dynamic cerebral reorganization in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia: a MRI-derived cortical thickness study. Psychol Med. 2016;46(10):2201–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bethlehem RAI, Romero-Garcia R, Mak E, Bullmore ET, Baron-Cohen S. Structural covariance networks in children with autism or ADHD. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(8):4267–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Mak E, Colloby SJ, Thomas A, O’Brien JT. The segregated connectome of late-life depression: a combined cortical thickness and structural covariance analysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;48:212–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Palaniyappan L, Marques TR, Taylor H, Mondelli V, Reinders A, Bonaccorso S, et al. Globally efficient brain organization and treatment response in psychosis: a connectomic study of Gyrification. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42(6):1446–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Yoon S, Jun CS, Jeong HS, Lee S, Lim SM, Ma J, et al. Altered cortical gyrification patterns in panic disorder: deficits and potential compensation. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47(10):1446–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Garcia-Ramos C, Lin JJ, Bonilha L, Jones JE, Jackson DC, Prabhakaran V, et al. Disruptions in cortico-subcortical covariance networks associated with anxiety in new-onset childhood epilepsy. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;12:815–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Roos A, Fouche JP, Stein DJ. Brain network connectivity in women exposed to intimate partner violence: a graph theory analysis study. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017;11(6):1629–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A1B03028464).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yun, JY., Kim, YK. (2020). Phenotype Network and Brain Structural Covariance Network of Anxiety. In: Kim, YK. (eds) Anxiety Disorders. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1191. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9705-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics