Economic Planning, Education Policy, and International Schools

  • Hyejin KimEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)


The expansion of transnational education corporations (TECs) might be viewed as the natural consequence of globalization. As demand for international school opportunities increases, there is perhaps little surprise that firms stepped in to provide those opportunities. Such a view misses the centrality of the state to the creation of markets for international education. States in parts of Asia have not been passive bystanders as international schools have transformed into lucrative businesses. Rather, states have actively participated in the commercialization of international education. States have supported this commercialization in the pursuit of economic goals. International schools have thus become objects not just of education policy but also, even mainly, of economic policy.


  1. Ball, S. J. (2009). Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: Network governance and the ‘competition state’. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition, 32(2), 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daquila, T. C. (2013). Internationalizing higher education in Singapore: Government policies and the NUS experience. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(5), 629–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davie, S. (2015, February 17). Home-grown international schools in demand from Singaporeans. The Straits Times. Accessed December 8, 2017.
  5. Department of Statistics Singapore (2017). Yearbook of statistics Singapore. Accessed June 26, 2018.
  6. Education Investor. (2017, July 17). Expansion for Vietnam.Google Scholar
  7. Ge, Y., & Ho, K. (2011). Education and human capital management in a world city: The case of Singapore. Asian Pacific Journal of Education, 31(3), 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist welfare capitalism: Social policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 48(4), 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Koh, A., & Chong, T. (2014). Education in the global city: The manufacturing of education in Singapore. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(5), 625–636.Google Scholar
  11. Lai, A., & Maclean, R. (2011). Managing human capital in world cities: The development of Hong Kong into an education hub. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31(3), 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis, N. (2011). Political projects and micro-practices of globalising education: Building an international education industry in New Zealand. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(2), 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mok, K. (2008). Singapore’s global education hub ambitions. International Journal of Education Management, 22(6), 527–546.Google Scholar
  14. Nexus International School. (2015, December 1). Press release: Nexus International School secures RFI for new campus at Aljunied. Accessed September 25, 2017.
  15. Olds, K. (2007). Global assemblage: Singapore, foreign universities, and the construction of a ‘global education hub’. World Development, 35(6), 959–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pak, T. N., & Tan, C. (2010). The Singapore global schoolhouse: An analysis of the development of the tertiary education landscape in Singapore. International Journal of Education Management, 24(3), 178–188.Google Scholar
  17. Philomin, L. (2015, April 28). More land parcels may be released to set up international schools. Today Online. Accessed December 12, 2017.
  18. Saltman, K. J. (2005). The Edison schools: Corporate schooling and the assault on public education. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sidhu, R. (2009). The brand name research university goes global. Higher Education, 57(2), 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sidhu, G., & Kaur, S. (2011). Enhancing global competence in higher education: Malaysia strategic initiatives. Journal of Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific, 36(4), 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sidhu, R., Ho, K. C., & Yeoh, B. (2011). Emerging education hubs: The case of Singapore. Higher Education, 61(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spring, J. (2015). Economization of education: Human capital, global corporations, skill-based schooling. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Srivastava, P. (2016). Questioning the global scaling up of low-fee private schooling: The nexus between business, philanthropy, and PPPs. In A. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2016: The global education indistry (pp. 248–263). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Welch, A. (2011). Higher education in Southeast Asia: Blurring borders, changing balance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang, C. (2017, April 19). School to be reused for expat students. The Straits Times. Accessed January 2018.
  26. Yeoh, S. P. (2014). Entrepreneurs in private higher education: A case study of education entrepreneurs in a middle income economy. International Educational Innovation and Public Sector Entrepreneurship, 23, 209–249.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations