Skip to main content

Agrarian Relations, Institutions, and Land Reform in Nepal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Transformation in Nepal

Abstract

The chapter analyzes the main issues related to access to land and poverty, landownership distribution, access to land for women and the indigenous peoples, landlessness and lack of viable landholdings, land rentals, tenancy rights, and fallow land. It reviews existing laws and policies on land and land rights, land reform in the context of smallholder agriculture, and land administration. It also draws lessons for Nepal from the experiences of other countries in land reform. Finally, it makes policy recommendations to enhance the access to the landless and marginal farmers to land and also to improve access to vital infrastructure such as farm roads and irrigation, technical support system, marketing, and land consolidation, which are vital for agricultural productivity enhancement and income increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Radical land reform, here, refers to a practice of fixing a ceiling on landownership and state taking the control of excess land without paying the price for the land, and then freely distributing the land to the needy people like landless or marginal farmers or farm laborers. It is assumed, here, that ‘land’ is a part of natural capital to which everyone has free access and only the state is the owner.

  2. 2.

    This included programs like land bank which would facilitate the linkage between willing sellers of land (generally landowner) and willing buyers of land (landless and marginal farmers, farm laborers), tenure reform, incremental taxation on land to discourage large holdings, land consolidation, and the like. Nepal had a ‘land bank’ program until 2006, but this was discontinued, as there was a claim that it helped just to buy the land of large landowners at higher prices who were after all prepared to sell land in the market at lower prices. But, again, afterward, there were suggestions to have a land bank, which would connect land sellers and land buyers to be supported by the government’s subsidy and the price to be fixed by the government’s agencies based on market survey.

  3. 3.

    Like bondage, unfree labor, and imperfect labor market where there is no perfect information about the work, wage rates, and no willing buyer and willing supplier of labor.

  4. 4.

    Remittance in Nepal is equivalent to 29.2% of the GDP, which is more or less equal (including the remittances coming from informal sources) to contribution of agricultural sector (33% of GDP). Nepal Living Standard Survey Reports reveal a significant increase in the proportion of households receiving remittances (23.4% in 1993/94 to 31.9% in 2003/04 and 55.8% in 2010/11). The volume of remittances each household received was Rs. 15,160 in 1993/94, Rs. 34,698 in 2003/04, and Rs. 80,436 in 2010/11 (CBS 2013).

  5. 5.

    The data on average landholding size is slightly different from one study to another.

  6. 6.

    About 24.5% households are landless and 7% households semi-landless, owing less than 0.2 acres (UNDP 2004). According to CRSC, there are 1.02 million landless families and additional 450 thousands (0.45 million) Jotaha or Hali families, i.e., those who plow other’s land usually on annual (Haliya—Reading Material-5, pp. 1–2, not dated). As early as 1994, Badal Commission on Land Reform had estimated that about 500,000 people were completely landless in the early 1990s.

  7. 7.

    CRSC (nd). Haliya. Reading Material-5. pp. 1–2.

  8. 8.

    However, there is other data that counters the government’s agriculture census reports. In 1985, according to a study carried out by IDS, 31% of farm families were tenants—10.8% registered and 22.3% nonregistered (IDS 1985). According to Badal Commission, there were 0.56 million tenant farmers in 1994, 20% farm families were tenants, and total land area cultivated by them was about 12% of the cultivable land. At that time, the registered tenants were 370,127, of which 72% lived in the Terai, 24% in Kathmandu valley, and 4% in the hills. According to Nepal Living Standard Survey II (2003–04), 31% farmers (about one million farm families) work as tenants.

  9. 9.

    These include Land Acquisition Act 1977, Land Act 1964, Birta Abolition Act 1959, Land Revenue Act 1977, Trust Corporation (Guthi) Act 1976, Land Survey and Measurement Act 1963, Range Land Nationalization Act, 1974. Similarly, Forest Act 1993 and Forest Regulations 2000 are important Acts to govern forestland.

Abbreviations

ADB:

Asian Development Bank

BS:

Bikram Sambat (Nepali year)

CARP:

Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program

CBS:

Central Bureau of Statistics

CSRC:

Community Self-Reliance Centre

DFID:

Department for International Development

DoLIA:

Department of Land Information and Archive

FDI:

Foreign Direct Investment

GDP:

Gross Domestic Product

GLOF:

Glacial Lake Outburst Flood

GoN:

Government of Nepal

IDS:

Integrated Development Study

IFAD:

International Fund for Agriculture Development

IPs:

Indigenous Peoples

LFUG:

Leasehold Forest Users Group

MLRM:

Ministry of Land Reform and Management

NA:

Not Available

NGO:

Non-Governmental Agency

NLSS:

Nepal Living Standard Survey

UNDP:

United Nations Development Program

WTO:

World Trade Organization

References

  • Adhikari, J., & Hobley, M. (2012). Every one is leaving, who will sow the seeds. A study of the impact of migration to Gulf States and Malaysia on the livelihoods of Khotang District, Nepal. Swiss Development Corporation/Swiss Embassy, Kathmandu and Nepal Institute of Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikari, J., & Hobley, M. (2015). Everyone is leaving, who will sow our fields’. Impact of migration to Gulf countries and Malaysia in Khotang and Udaypur districts of Nepal. Himalaya, The Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies in US, 35(1), 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikari, J. (2009). Land reform in Nepal: Problems and prospects. Kathmandu: ActionAid Nepal and NIDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikari, J. (2010). Access to land and social inclusion in the context of high mobility in Nepal. In K. Stokke & M. D. Manandhar (Eds.), State and society: Social exclusion and inclusion in Nepal (pp. 91–130). Kathmandu: Mandala Book Point.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. (1973). Size, productivity, and returns to scale: An analysis of farm level data in Indian agriculture. Journal of Political Science, 81(6), 1370–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai, B. (2003). The nature of underdevelopment and regional structure of Nepal. New Delhi: Adroit Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., Cameron, J., & Seddon, D. (1980) [2001]. Nepal in crisis: Growth and stagnation at the periphery: Revised and enlarged edition. New Delhi: Adroit Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J. W. (1989). Community forestry: Rapid appraisal of trees and land tenure. Rome: FAO (Community Forestry Note 5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J., & Li, Z. (2009). Crossing the river while feeling the rocks: Land-tenure reform in China. In D. Spielman & R. Pandya-Lorch (Eds.), Millions fed: Proven successes in agricultural development. Washington, DC: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics), World Bank, DFID, & ADB. (2006). Resilience amidst the conflict. Kathmandu: CBS and World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS. (2006). Monograph. Agricultural census 2001–2002. Kathmandu: CBS.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS. (2013). NLSS III report. Kathmandu, Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, R. (2011). Operation Barga: An exercise in legal empowerment? A qualitative study of sharecroppers (‘bargadar’) and landowners in a West Bengal village. A Master’s thesis submitted at Sociology Department of Lund University, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., Jin, S., Liu, Y., & Singh, S. (2015). Labor market performance and the farm size-productivity relationship in rural India. Paper presented at the International conference of agricultural economists: Agriculture in an interconnected world. Universita degli di Milano, August 8–14, 2015, Milan, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAD. (2003). Review of leasehold forestry project. Rome: IFAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Integrated Development Systems (IDS). (1985). Rural landlessness in Nepal. Kathmandu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, M., & Tuan, N. (2009). Exiting from collective agriculture: land-tenure reform in Vietnam. In D. Spielman and R. Pandya-Lorch (Eds.), Millions fed: Proven successes in agricultural development. Washington, DC: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. (2009). Land reform in developing countries: Property rights and property wrongs. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, C. (2014). Nepal and capitalism. The Kathmandu Post. June 10, 2014. p. 4. http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2014-06-10/nepal-and-capitalism.html.

  • Otsuka, K. (2015). The future of small farms in Asia. Paper presented at the International Association of Agricultural Economists, 2015 Conference, August 9–14, 2015, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka, K. (2013). Food insecurity, income inequality, and the changing comparative advantage in world agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 44, 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paudel, K., Tamang, S., & Shrestha, K. K. (2014). Transforming land and livelihoods: Analysis of agricultural land abandonment in the mid hills of Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 12(1), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi, M. C. (1978). Land tenure and taxation in Nepal. Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi, M. C. (1988). An economic history of Nepal. New Delhi: Nath Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi, M. C. (1999) [1977]. Land ownership in Nepal. New Delhi: Adroit Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddell, J. C. (1987). Land tenure and agro-forestry: A regional overview. In J. B. Raintree (Ed.), Land, trees and tenure (pp. 1–16). Nairobi/Madison, USA: Land Tenure Center/University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1962). An aspect of Indian agriculture. Economic Weekly, Annual Number, February 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, F. (2016). A mode of production flux: The transformation and reproduction of rural class relations in lowland Nepal and North Bihar. Dialectical Anthropology, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-016-9436-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, S. (2007). The relationship between farm size and productivity: Empirical evidence from the Nepalese mid-hills. Paper prepared for presentation at the XXII National Conference of Labour Economics, Napoli, September 13–14, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, G. (2016). Land markets in Asia: A synthesis of issues, lessons and policy implications. A background paper for APR’s outlook report, APR, IFAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, B. (1990). Farm Size and Productivity in Nepalese Agriculture: A Case Study of Nawal Parasi District. Research Report Series No. 9, HMG Ministry of Agriculture—Winrock International—Policy Analysis in Agriculture and Related Resource Management, Kathmandu.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2004). Human development report of Nepal. Kathmandu: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Yamauchi, F., Otsuka, K., & Huang, J. (2014). Wage Growth, Landholding and Machine Services in China. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy and the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J. C. (1996). Spirited women: Gender, religion and cultural identity in the Nepal Himalaya. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi, F. (2014). Wage growth, landholding and mechanization in agriculture: Evidence from Indonesia. Policy Research Working Paper No. 6789, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., et al. (2016). Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature, 537(7622), 671–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jagannath Adhikari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Adhikari, J. (2019). Agrarian Relations, Institutions, and Land Reform in Nepal. In: Thapa, G., Kumar, A., Joshi, P. (eds) Agricultural Transformation in Nepal. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9648-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9648-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9647-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9648-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics