Skip to main content

Sounding Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 365 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Sound ((PASTS))

Abstract

This chapter expands on the animal’s voice as it encroaches upon the scientific field of bioacoustics, an interdisciplinary field bridging biological and acoustic sciences that uses sound technologies to record, preserve, and analyze large datasets of animal communications. This chapter contributes to methodological discussions regarding the longstanding questions of how researchers and scientists are implicated in the knowledge and objects they collectively produce, and how they value infrastructures of audibility on a global and longitudinal scale. This is accomplished by giving a sustained, detailed account of the science of (computational) bioacoustics—particularly how its modes of measurement allow for a new way of understanding what is involved in the decentred modes of hearing that recentre acts of listening— and by considering the nature of the relation between researcher and researched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, M., Cox, T., Moore, G., Croxford, B., Refaee, M., & Sharples, S. (2006). Sustainable soundscapes: Noise policy and the urban experience. Urban Studies, 43(13), 2385–2398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. (2010). VoxNet: Reducing latency in high data rate applications. In E. Gaura, L. Girod, J. Brusey, M. Allen, & G. Challen (Eds.), Wireless sensor networks: Deployments and design frameworks (pp. 115–158). London, UK: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Asdal, K. (2008). Subjected to parliament: The laboratory of experimental medicine and the animal body. Social Studies of Science, 38(6), 899–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • August, T., Harvey, M., Lightfoot, P., Kilbey, D., Papadopoulos, T., & Jepson, P. (2015). Emerging technologies for biological recording. Biological Journal of the Linnean Societ, 115(3), 731–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Back, L. (2007). The art of listening. London, UK: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, L. F., & Keister, R. A. (2005). Why birdsong is sometimes like music. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48(3), 426–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, E. M., Habib, L., & Boutin, S. (2008). Impacts of chronic anthropogenic noise from energy sector activity on abundance of songbirds in the boreal forest. Conservation Biology, 22(5), 1186–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benschop, R. (2007). Memory machines or musical instruments? Soundscapes, recording technologies and reference. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(4), 485–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, E. (2015). Welcome to the quietest square inch in the U.S. outside. Outside Online. Retrieved from https://www.outsideonline.com/2000721/welcome-quietest-square-inch-us.

  • Blesser, B., & Salter, L. R. (2007). Spaces speak, are you listening? Experiencing aural architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, D. T., Mennill, D. J., Clemins, P., Girod, L., Yao, K., Patricelli, G., … Kirschel, A. (2011). Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: Applications, technological considerations and prospectus. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3), 758–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borker, A. L., Halbert, P., McKown, M. W., Tershy, B. R., & Croll, D. A. (2015). A comparison of automated and traditional monitoring techniques for marbled murrelets using passive acoustic sensors. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 39(4), 813–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, A. R. (1937). Why bird song cannot be described adequately. The Wilson Bulletin, 49(1), 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruyninckx, J. (2018). Listening in the field: Recording and the science of birdsong. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, H. (2013). Individuation, the mass and farm animals. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(7–8), 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candea, M. (2013). Habituating meerkats and redescribing animal behaviour science. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(7–8), 105–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandola, T. (2012). Listening in to water routes: Soundscapes as cultural systems. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekera, T., Yoon, S.-Y., & D’Souza, N. (2015). Virtual environments with soundscapes: A study on immersion and effects of spatial abilities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 42, 1003–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiew, F. (2014). Posthuman ethics with Cary Wolfe and Karen Barad: Animal compassion as trans-species entanglement. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(4), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? AIBS Bulletin, 58(3), 192–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connors, J. P., Patrick, J., Lei, S., & Kelly, M. (2012). Citizen science in the age of neogeography: Utilizing volunteered geographic information for environmental monitoring. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(6), 1267–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, M. L., & Campbell, L. M. (2012). Co-producing conservation and knowledge: Citizen-based sea turtle monitoring in North Carolina, USA. Social Studies of Science, 42(1), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist, E. (1996). Naturalists’ portrayals of animal life: Engaging the verstehen approach. Social Studies of Science, 26(4), 799–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist, E. (2004). Can an insect speak? The case of the honeybee dance language. Social Studies of Science, 34(1), 7–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Coensel, B., & Botteldooren, D. (2007). The rhythm of the urban soundscape. Noise and Vibration Worldwide, 38(9), 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2013). Responding bodies and partial affinities in human–animal worlds. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(7/8), 66–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, A. (2016, July 11). National network of acoustic recorders proposed to eavesdrop on australian ecosystems. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-11/soundscape-ecology-could-track-environmental-changes/7587354.

  • Farina, A. (2014). Soundscape ecology: Principles, patterns, methods and applications. London, UK: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A., Lattanzi, E., Malavasi, R., Pieretti, N., & Piccioli, L. (2011). Avian soundscapes and cognitive landscapes: Theory, application and ecological perspectives. Landscape Ecology, 26(9), 1257–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A., Pieretti, N., & Piccioli, L. (2011). The soundscape methodology for long-term bird monitoring: A Mediterranean Europe case-study. Ecological Informatics, 6(6), 354–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, J. (2016). Making operative concepts from Murray Schafer’s soundscapes typology: A qualitative and comparative analysis of noise pollution in Bangkok, Thailand, and Los Angeles, California. Urban Studies, 53(1), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friese, C., & Clarke, A. E. (2012). Transposing bodies of knowledge and technique: Animal models at work in reproductive sciences. Social Studies of Science, 42(1), 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrys, J. (2016). Program earth: Environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. (2015). Field recording and the sounding of spaces. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(3), 560–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraud, E., & Hollin, G. (2016). Care, laboratory beagles and affective utopia. Theory, Culture and Society, 33(4), 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. J. D. (2007). Citizens, science and bird conservation. Journal of Ornithology, 148(Suppl. 1), S77–S124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2016). Soundscape ecology: Eavesdropping on nature. Deutsche Well (DW). Retrieved from http://www.dw.com/en/soundscape-ecology-eavesdropping-on-nature/a-19304871.

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. (2011). “Soundscape ecology”: The new science helping identify ecosystems at risk. Ecologist: Setting the environmental agenda since 1970. Retrieved from https://theecologist.org/investigations/science_and_technology/1171165/soundscape_ecology_the_new_science_helping_identify_ecosystems_at_risk.html.%20Accessed%20September%2030,%202017.

  • Helmreich, S. (2015). Sounding the limits of life: Essays in the anthropology of biology and beyond. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. (2007). Olivier messiaen: Oiseaux exotiques. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Bioacoustics Council. (2019). http://www.ibac.info.

  • Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. J. (1995). Listening in Paris: A cultural history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircher, A. (1650/1970). Musurgia universalis. Hildesheim and New York: G. Olms (Reprint of the Rome, 1650 edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures, and their consequences. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronenberg, J. (2014). Environmental impacts of the use of ecosystem services: Case study of birdwatching. Environmental Management, 54(3), 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laiolo, P. (2010). The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation. Biological Conservation, 143(7), 1635–1645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latimer, J. (2013). Being alongside: Rethinking relations among different kinds. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(7/8), 77–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A. (2006). “No personal motive?” Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place and Environment, 9(3), 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A. (2010). Social media and the production of knowledge: A return to little science? Social Epistemology, 24(3), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. E. (1988). Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science, 18(2), 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumder, A. (2016). Pacific North West LNG Project: A review and assessment of the project plans and their potential impacts on marine fish and fish habitat in the Skeena estuary. Environmental Assessment Report, Government of Canada. Minister of Environment and Climate Change. https://www.ceaa.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/80032?culture=en-CA.

  • Merchant, N. D., Fristrup, K. M., Johnson, M. P., Tyack, P. L., Witt, M. J., Blondel, P., & Parks, S. E. (2015). Methods in ecology and evolution. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6(3), 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M. (2012). Anecdote. In C. Lury & N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive methods: The happening of the social (pp. 25–35). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M., & Birke, L. (1994). Enrolling the core set: The case of the animal experimentation controversy. Social Studies of Science, 24(1), 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2010). The ecological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, R. (2009). Birdsong and the image of evolution. Society and Animals, 17, 206–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, N. C. (2013). Modeling mouse, human, and discipline: Epistemic scaffolds in animal behavior genetics. Social Studies of Science, 43(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obrist, M. K., Pavan, G., Sueur, J., Riede, K., Llusia, D., & Marquez, R. (2010). Bioacoustics approaches in biodiversity inventories. In J. Eymann, J. Degreef, C. L. Häuser, J. C. Monje, Y. Samyn, & D. Vandan Spiegel (Eds.), Manual on field recording techniques and protocols for all taxa biodiversity inventories (pp. 68–99). Brussels: Belgian Development Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski, B. C., Farina, A, Gage, S. H., Dumyahn, S. L., & Krause, B. L. (2011). What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landscape Ecology, 26(9), 1213–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski, B. C., Villanueva-Rivera, L. J., Dumyahn, S. L., Farina, A., Krause, B. L., Napoletano, B. M., & Pieretti, N. (2011). Soundscape ecology: The science of sound in the landscape. BioScience, 61(3), 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponomarenko, A., Vincent, O., Pietriga, A., Cochard, H., Badel, É., & Marmottant, P. (2014). Ultrasonic emissions reveal individual cavitation bubbles in water-stressed wood. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11(99), 20140480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, A. (2016). Preserving the quietest places. The California Sunday Magazine. Retrieved from https://story.californiasunday.com/quietest-places-on-earth.

  • Priest, E. (2018). Earworms, daydreams and cognitive capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(1), 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radick, G. (2007). The simian tongue: The long debate about animal language. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, R. S., Hobson, K. A., Holborn, G., Wilgenburg, S. L. V., & Elliott, J. (2005). Bioacoustic monitoring of forest songbirds: Interpreter variability and effects of configuration and digital processing methods in the laboratory. Journal of Field Ornithology, 76(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J. (2017). Sustainability: A greener future. Nature, 546(7659), 565–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, D. (2008). Thousand-mile song: Whale music in a sea of sound. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. M. (1994). The soundscape. Rochester, VT: Destiny Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servick, K. (2014). Eavesdropping on ecosystems. Science, 343(6173), 834–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicular, S. (2013, January 22). Big Data is falling into the trough of disillusionment. Retrieved from Gartner database. https://blogs.gartner.com/svetlana-sicular/big-data-is-falling-into-the-trough-of-disillusionment/.

  • Slabbekoorn, H., & Peet, M. (2003). Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature, 424, 267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, J. (2003). The audible past: Cultural origins of sound reproduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics & time 1: The fault of epimetheus (R. Beardsworth, Trans.). Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szostak, R., Gnoli, C., & López-Huertas, M. (2016). Interdisciplinary knowledge organization. New York: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tegeler, A. K., Morrison, M. L., & Szewczak, J. M. (2012). Using extended-duration audio recordings to survey avian species. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 36(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tønnessen, M. (2015). The biosemiotic glossary project: Agent, agency. Biosemiotics, 8, 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torino, L. (2015). You can actually hear the climate changing. Outside. Retrieved from https://www.outsideonline.com/2035701/you-can-actually-hear-climate-changing.

  • Truax, B. (2001). Acoustic communication (Vol. 1). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallee, M. (2017). The rhythm of echoes and echoes of violence. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(1), 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartan, S. (2016). We’re changing the way the world sounds: Noise impacts ecosystems in more ways than you might think. Mother Nature Network. Retrieved from http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/blogs/we-are-changing-way-world-sounds.

  • von Uexküll, J. (1982). Glossary. Semiotica, 42(1), 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallheimer, B. (2011, March 23). New scientific study will study ecological importance of sounds. Science News. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110301122154.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vallee, M. (2020). Sounding Data. In: Sounding Bodies Sounding Worlds. Palgrave Studies in Sound. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9327-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9327-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9326-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9327-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics