Abstract
Advertising, as no other professional discourse type, presupposes extensive use of expressive linguistic means specially designed for producing emotional effects on the addressee. This research proceeds the premise that the language expressive function, as the ability to reflect human emotions, subjective perception and attitude to the denoted issues, is actualised not only in lexical, but also in speech structural forms. Hence, the purpose of the article is to sort out and analyse the expressive potential of syntactic means in building up advertising texts, since it focuses on rhetorical influence on the recipient, which attributes discursive features to advertisements. Texts of different volumes are taken to exemplify the significance of expressive syntax in advertising, and direct correlation between text sizes and syntactic expressive means saturation is revealed with methods of functional linguistics and quantitative analysis. The corpus of syntactic devices under analysis includes various structural sentences types, parentheses, syntactic parallelism and repetitions, parcelling and other constructions. The authors conclude that the specific advertising discourse feature lies in the possibility for expressive syntactic means to grow into stylistic and pragmatic devices.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdullah, M., Sudhakar, B. D., & Rahman, M. S. (2016). Brand positioning constructs and indicators for measurement of consumer’s positive psychology toward brands. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, Puducherry, 7(1), 124–126.
Akhmanova, O. (2005). Dictionary of linguistic terms. Moscow: YURSS.
Aleksandrova, O. (1984). The expressive syntax issues. Moscow: Vysshaya shcola.
Aleksandrova, O. (2000). The language cognitive function in the view of the functional approach. Cognitive Features of Language Categorization, 151–153.
Aleksandrova, O., Mendzheritskaya, E., & Malakhova, V. (2017). Dynamic changes in modern English discourse. Training Language and Culture, 1(1), 100–117.
Arnold, I. (2002). Stylistics. Modern English. Moscow: Flinta, Nauka.
Bally, Ch. (1965). Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Quatrième édition revue et corrigée. Bern: Francke.
Barkhudarov, L. (1966). The structure of a simple sentence in the modern English language. Moscow: Vysshaya schola.
Beregovskaya, E. (2004). Essays on expressive syntax. Moscow: Rokhos. Publ.
Bergs, A. (2008). Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Bloch, M. (2005). English grammar. Theory. Moscow: Vysshaya shcola.
Bobee, C., & Arens, W. (2003). Contemporary advertising. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Burkova, T. (2002). The issue of ellipsis sentences in linguistics, theoretical and practical aspects of linguistics and linguodidactics. Surgut.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
Cole, J. (2010). The role of syntactic structure in guiding prosody perception with ordinary listeners and everyday speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7–9), 1141–1177.
Degan, L., & Fagard, B. (2011). Alors between discourse and grammar: The role of syntactic position. Functions of Language, 18(1), 19–56.
Delin, J. (2000). The language of everyday life: An introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
Fabrey, A. (1998). How to produce successful advertising. New York: Kogan Page.
Goddard, A. (2002). The language of advertising. Written texts. London: Taylor & Francis.
Henneberg, S., & O’Shaughnessy, N. (2007). Theory and concept in political marketing: Issues and an Agenda. Journal of Political Marketing, 6(2/3), 5–31.
Ilyish, B. (1971). The system of modern English language. Moscow: Prosvesheniye.
Jaysingle, L., & Ritson, M. (2013). Everyday advertising context: An ethnography of advertising response in the family living room. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 104–121.
Jespersen, O. (1984). Analytical syntax. University of Chicago Press.
Kim, G., & Lee, J.-H. (2011). The effect of search condition and advertising type on visual attention to internet advertising. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14(5), 323–325.
Kim, J.-B., & Sells, P. (2011). The big mess construction: interactions between the lexicon and constructions. English Language and Linguistics, 15, 335–362.
Kiseleva, A. (2017). Modern trends and prospects of the English language development. In Conference proceedings of 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM. Science and Society (Book 3) (Vol. 2, pp. 849–856). Albena, Bulgaria.
Kobrina, N., Boldyrev, N., & Hydyakov, A. (2002). Theoretical grammar of the English language. Moscow: Vesshaya Schola.
Ledeneva, S. (2018). Advertising as specific discourse type: ontology and functional pragmatics. In SGEM2018 Vienna Art Conference Proceedings of 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2018, www.sgemvienna.org (Vol. 5, Issue 3.1, pp. 3–10). https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2018h/31/s10.001.
Leech, G. (1966). English in advertising. London: Longman.
Lustrer, L. (1986). Types of nomination as a means of expressive syntax. Imagery and Expressive Means of Language, 117–125.
Matthews, P. (2007). The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McLoughlin, L. (2017). The language of magazines. Taylor & Francis Group.
Mokshantsev, R. (2009). Psychology of marketing. Moscow, Novosibirsk: Infra-M.
Neeta, P., Kimberly, Y., & James, M. (2013). Selection of neighborhood controls for a population-based Lyme disease case-control study by using a commercial marketing database. American Journal of Epidemiology, 178(2), 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws464.
Prado-Alonso, C. (2015). The “as be the case” construction. English Studies, 96(6), 690–709.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). Comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, New York: Longman.
Rosenthal, D., & Telenkova, M. (1985). Reference dictionary on linguistic terms. Moscow: Prosvesheniye.
Rothschild, M. (1987). Advertising from fundamentals to strategies. Toronto: Heath.
Romat, Eu., & Senderov, D. (2016). Marketing. Practical theory. St.-Petersburg: Piter.
Shannon, C., & Warren, W. (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Tošović, B. (2006). Expressive syntax of the Russian and Serbian/Croatian languages. Moscow: Languages of Slavic culture.
Troshina, N. (2011). Text models in advertising discourse. In N. N. Troshina (Ed.), Advertising communication. Linguocultural aspect (pp. 27–40). Moscow: INION RAN.
Uchenova, V. (2003). Philosophy of advertising. Moscow: Gella-print.
Valgina, N. (2003). The theory of text. Moscow: Logos.
Vinogradov, V. (1980). The style of the “Queen of Spades”. On the language of artistic prose. Moscow.
Vinogradov, A. (1981). To the question of differentiation between parcelling and dynamic addition. The Issues of Linguistics, 3, 98–111.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aleksandrova, O.V., Korableva, E.A., Kharkovskaya, A.A. (2020). Expressive Syntactic Devices as Means of Forming Advertising Discourse. In: Malyuga, E. (eds) Functional Approach to Professional Discourse Exploration in Linguistics . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9103-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9103-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9102-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9103-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)