Advertisement

Generation Z pp 115-129 | Cite as

Girls, Ghouls and Girlhoods: Horror and Fashion at Monster High

  • Karen E. WohlwendEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education book series (CSTE)

Abstract

How does a zombie doll in a popular horror franchise for tween girls serve as a productive site of contestation among overlapping visions of girlhood? In this chapter, I examine Ghoulia Yelps, a zombie character in the popular Monster High fashion doll franchise, not only as a toy in a global flow of licensed consumer goods but also as a site of identity construction and digital media production where facile notions of girlhoods are both enacted and reimagined. Monster High is reconceptualized here as the site of converging cultural imaginaries in which children play in and out of gendered futures around fashion, adolescence, diversity, and schooling. Critical analysis of tween girls’ digital play with a zombie doll on social media reveals the resonances, slippages, and paradoxes among identity texts produced about, for, and by girls. After describing the scope of the Monster High franchise and how it materializes expectations for characters, consumers, and players, I next examine how these dolls and identity texts circulate three dominant imaginaries of girlhood. Finally, I analyze YouTube videos of girls’ play with the Ghoulia Yelps character to see how tween’s foregrounding of horror and wielding of zombie tropes opens opportunities to rupture and reimagine girlhoods.

Keywords

Social Medium Digital Medium Social Drama Identity Text Horror Film 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aronwitz, S. (1992). The politics of identity: Class, culture, social movements. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Black, R. W., Korobkova, K., & Epler, A. (2013). Barbie girls and Xtractaurs: Discourse and identity in virtual worlds for young children. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. Online first.Google Scholar
  3. Brougère, G. (2006). Toy houses: A socio-anthropological approach to analysing objects. Visual Communication, 5(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrington, V. (2003). ‘I’m in a bad mood. Let’s go shopping’: Interactive dolls, consumer culture and a ‘glocalized’ model of literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(1), 83–98.Google Scholar
  5. Collier, D. R. (2013). Relocalizing wrestler: Performing texts across time and space. Language and Education, 27(6), 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, D. T., & Kaiser, S. B. (2004). Betwixt and be tween: Age ambiguity and the sexualization of the female consuming subject. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(2), 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernie, D., Madrid, S., & Kantor, R. (Eds.). (2011). Educating toddlers to teachers: Learning to see and influence the school and peer cultures of classrooms. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  8. Forman-Brunell, M. (2012). Interrogating the meanings of dolls: New directions in doll studies. Girlhood Studies, 5(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hains, R. (2012). An afternoon of productive play with problematic dolls: The importance of foregrounding children’s voices in research. Girlhood Studies, 5(1), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harrison, L. (2010). Monster high. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  12. James, A. (1998). Confections, concoctions, and conceptions. In H. Jenkins (Ed.), The children’s culture reader (pp. 394–405). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kinder, M. (1991). Playing with power in movies, television, and video games: From Muppet Babies to Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kyratzis, A. (2004). Talk and interaction among children and the co-construction of peer groups and peer culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 625–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lemke, J. L. (2009). Multimodal genres and transmedia traversals: Social semiotics and the political economy of the sign. Semiotica, 173(1), 283–297.Google Scholar
  16. McAllister, M. P. (2007). “Girls with a passion for fashion”:The Bratz brand as integrated spectacular consumption. Journal of Children and Media, 1(3), 244–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McRobbie, A. (2004). Notes on ‘What Not To Wear’ and post-feminist symbolic violence. The Sociological Review, 52(s2), 97–109.Google Scholar
  18. Medina, C. L., & Wohlwend, K. E. (2014). Literacy, play, and globalization: Converging imaginaries in children’s critical and cultural performances. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Meyer, S. (2005). Twilight. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  20. Mosbergen, D. (2013). ‘Goth Barbies’ are the new ‘it’ toy, but are Monster High dolls a bad influence? The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/18/goth-barbie_n_3613443.html
  21. Orr, L. (2009). “Difference that is actually sameness mass-reproduced”: Barbie joins the princess convergence. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 1(1), 9–30.Google Scholar
  22. Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Pugh, A. J. (2009). Longing and belonging: Parents, children, and consumer culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rowsell, J., & Pahl, K. (2007). Sedimented identities in texts: Instances of practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(3), 388–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging Internet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Tasker, Y., & Negra, D. (Eds.). (2007). Interrogating postfeminism: Gender and the politics of popular culture. Chapel Hill: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wertheimer, S. (2006). Pretty in panties: Moving beyond the innocent child paradigm in reading preteen modeling websites. In Y. Jiwani, C. Steenburgen, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Girlhood: Redefining the limits (pp. 208–226). Montreal: Black Rose Press.Google Scholar
  29. Whitney, J. D. (2013). Beauty made plastic: Constructions of a Western feminine ideal. Word and Text: A Journal of Literary Studies and Linguistics, III(2), 119–132.Google Scholar
  30. Wohlwend, K. E. (2009). Damsels in discourse: Girls consuming and producing gendered identity texts through Disney Princess play. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 57–83. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.44.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wohlwend, K. E. (2012). The boys who would be princesses: Playing with gender identity intertexts in Disney Princess transmedia. Gender and Education, 24(6), 593–610. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.674495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wohlwend, K. E. (2014). Mediated discourse analysis: Tracking discourse in action. In M. M. Albers, T. Holbrook, & A. S. Flint (Eds.), New methods in literacy research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Wohlwend, K. E., & Hall, D. T. (2016). Race and rag dolls: Critically engaging the embodiment of diversity in Laloopsy transmedia. In G. Enriquez, E. Johnson, S. Kontovourki, & C. Mallozzi (Eds.), Literacies and the body: Putting theory and research into pedagogical practice (pp. 155–169). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Zimmerman, A. (2010). Mattel’s new playbook: Toy first, franchise next, The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704515704575282682475749528

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Literacy, Culture, and Language EducationIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations