Advertisement

Generation Z pp 145-157 | Cite as

Students as Zombies: How Can We Awaken the Undead?

  • Rebecca WestrupEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education book series (CSTE)

Abstract

Drawing on educational assessment research and literature and my reflections of working with students in Higher Education this chapter utilizes the metaphor of 'zombie' as an analytical tool to explore the interplay between assessments in compulsory education and the changing nature of some undergraduate students' learner identities. The chapter will consider how assessment in schools is creating a living dead culture within children's and young people's educational careers. Using the findings of a small-scale which explored students' and lecturers' experiences of Dialogue+, an intervention designed to support students' knowledge and understanding of assessment and feedback practices in universities, the chapter will then explore and discuss possible antidotes to the situation.

Keywords

Young People Compulsory Education Educational Career Lecture Theatre Seminar Room 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, R., & Hargreaves, L. (2007). Community Soundings: The primary review regional witness sessions. Cambridge: University of Cambridge and Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, R. (2010). Children, their world, their education: Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, J. & Clark, R. (2011) Peer mentoring works!: How peer mentoring enhances student success in higher education. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/what-works-student-retention/Aston_What_Works_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2012.
  4. Andrews, J., Clark, R. & Thomas, L. (2012) Compendium of effective research practice in higher education retention and success. Birmingham/York: Aston University/HEA.Google Scholar
  5. Assessment Reform Group (ARG). (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles – Research-based principles to guide classroom practice. Cambridge: Assessment Reform Group.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, D. (2012). Stoned with tiredness: Generation of children are becoming zombies because of late-night gaming sessions, claims charity. MailOnline. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2093413/Generation-children-zombies-late-night-gaming-sessions-claims-charity.html#ixzz3I1OcJLo3 Accessed: 05 June 2014.
  7. Ballinger, G. J. (2003). Bridging the gap between A level and degree: Some observations on managing the transitional stage in the study of English Literature. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 2(1), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barthes, R. (1967). Death of the author. Aspen, no. 5–6.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, I. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Bishop, K. (2009). Dead man still walking: Explaining the zombie renaissance. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 37(1), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: School of Education, King’s College London.Google Scholar
  12. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for Learning: Putting it into Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bloxham, S., & Campbell, E. (2010). Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of interactive cover sheets. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, S. (2013). Preface. In K. Sambell, L. McDowell, & C. Montgomery (Eds.), Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Carless, D., & Lam, R. (2014). The examined life: Perspectives of lower primary school students in Hong Kong. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary Elementary and Early Years Education, 42(3), 313–329.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, L. (2010). Grammar is back… and spelling will also score marks under exams shake-up. MailOnline. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1331443/Michael-Gove-brings-grammar-spelling-exam-marks-shake-up.html#ixzz3F56zKk6c. Accessed 7 May 2014.
  18. Daly, A. L., Baird, J., Chamberlain, S., & Meadows, M. (2012). Assessment reform: Students’ and teachers’ responses to the introduction of stretch and challenge at A-level. The Curriculum Journal, 23(2), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2008). The assessment for learning strategy. Nottingham: DCSF.Google Scholar
  20. Department for Education and Skills. (2004). 14–19 curriculum and qualifications reform: Final report of the Working Group on 14–19 reform (The Tomlinson Report). London: DfES.Google Scholar
  21. Drummond, M. J. (2012). Learning from Jason. In M. J. Drummond (Ed.), Assessing children’s learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Fautley, M., & Savage, J. (2008). Assessment for learning and teaching in secondary schools. Exeter: Learning Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Filer, A., & Pollard, A. (2000). The social world of pupil assessment in primary school. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  24. Gil, N. (2014). Sixth form students: Get ready for an education without spoonfeeding. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/jan/23/sixth-form-students-university-spoonfeeding. Accessed 15 Aug 2014.
  25. Green, C., Hamnett, L., & Green, S. (2001). Children put the national tests to the test. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 29(3), 39–42.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, K., Collins, J., Benjamin, S., Nind, M., & Sheehy, K. (2004). SATurated models of pupildom: Assessment and inclusion/exclusion. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 802–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanson, F. A. (1994). Testing testing: Social consequences of the examined life. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hopkins, S. (2014). New GCSEs penalise brightest pupils for giving longer answers in language exams, headmistress claims. MailOnline. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2737545/New-GCSEs-penalise-brightest-pupils-longer-answers-language-exams-headmistress-claims.html. Accessed 3 Sep 2014.
  29. Horning, M. (2014, Spring). Zombification of education (Part 1). New Mexico English Journal, 18–21.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, H., Black, B., Green, J., Langton, P., Rutherford, S., Scott, J., & Brown, S. (2014). Indications of knowledge retention in the transition to higher education. Journal of Biological Education, 49(3), 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kantanis, T. (2000). The role of social transition in students’ adjustment to the first year of university. Journal of Institutional Research, 9, 100–110.Google Scholar
  32. Lea, M. (1998). Academic literacies and learning in higher education: Constructing knowledge through texts and experience. Studies in the Education of Adults, 30(2), 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5–32.Google Scholar
  34. Lowe, H., & Cook, A. (2003). Mind the gap: Are students prepared for higher education? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(1), 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelsen, P. (2012). Loving the zombie: Arendtian natality in a time of loneliness. Philosophy of Education, 235–242Google Scholar
  36. O’Neil, P. (2008) Using peer writing fellows in British universities: Complexities and Possibilities. Across the Disciplines: A Journal of Language, Learning and Academic Writing. www.wac.colostate.edu/ATD/fellows/index.cfm. Accessed 4 Nov 2015
  37. Price, M., Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., Handley, K., & Bryant, R. (2012). Assessment literacy: The foundation for improving student learning. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.Google Scholar
  38. Reay, D., & Wiliam, D. (1999). I’ll be a nothing: Structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Sellgren, K. (2014). Freshers forget 60 % of their A-level studies http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-28014519. Accessed 16 July 2014.
  41. Smith, K. (2004). School to university: An investigation into the experience of first-year students of English at British Universities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 3(1), 81–93.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, H. (2008). Spoon-feeding: Or how I learned to stop worrying and love the mess. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 715–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sommerville, E. M., & Creme, P. (2005). Asking Pompeii questions: A co-operative approach to writing in the disciplines. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Syal, R. (2013). Rise in number of teachers claiming they are under pressure to inflate grades. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/aug/11/academy-schools-teachers-grade-inflation. Accessed 03 Oct 2014.
  45. The Task Group on Assessment and Testing (TGAT). (1988). National curriculum, report. London: DES.Google Scholar
  46. White, J. (2014). Who needs examinations? A story of climbing ladders and dodging snakes. London: Institute of Education Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004) Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11(1), 49–65.Google Scholar
  48. Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education and Lifelong LearningUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations