Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Impacts of Packaging Materials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Footprints of Packaging

Abstract

When humankind began to store food or other items for next-day use, packaging in its primitive form emerged. In ancient times, leaves and bushes were used. By using high-end lightweight, durable, and cheaper material, today’s packing industry has evolved exponentially. The industry is continuously searching for packaging solutions that have better strength, are easier to handle, are hygienic, are lightweight, and, most importantly, are sustainable. The major packaging materials are plastic, polystyrene, cardboard, etc. All of these materials are low in cost, light in weight, and durable. The world’s growing population has led to large amount of packaging waste, which further contributes to the problem of its disposal and other environmental issues. High-energy consumption (embodied) and environmental problems are associated with packaging materials, which underscores the need to regard the proper use of packaging materials from an environment point of view. To analyse and quantify the environmental impacts associated with various packaging materials, an effective methodology is required. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is an effective tool that can be utilised to evaluate various environmental impacts of packaging materials. This chapter discusses the environmental impacts associated with packaging materials and the use of LCA to evaluate these impacts so that they can be reduced considerably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • APCC (Australian Packaging Covenant) (2009) A commitment by governments and industry to the sustainable design, use and recovery of packaging. Australian Packaging Covenant Council (APCC), Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Arena AP, De Rosa C (2003) Life cycle assessment of energy and environmental implications of the implementation of conservative technologies in school building in Mendoza-Argentina. Build Environ 38:359–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F (2003) Life cycle assessment of a plastic packaging recycling system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(4):92–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Busser S, Jungbluth N (2009) The role of flexible packaging in the life cycle of coffee and butter. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Energy Commission (CEC) (1998) Baseline energy outlook. P300-98-012, Aug 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • COMPASS—Comparative Packaging Assessment (2009), www.sustainablepackaging.org

  • Craighill AL, Powell JC (1996) Lifecycle assessment and economic evaluation of recycling

    Google Scholar 

  • Detzel A, Monckert J (2009) Environmental evaluation of aluminium cans for beverages in the German context. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration (EIA) (1997) Commercial buildings characteristics 1995. US Department of Energy, Aug 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Envirowise (2008a) Packaging design for the environment: reducing costs and quantities. Envirowise, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Envirowise (2008b) Packguide: a guide to packaging eco-design. Envirowise, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Envirowise (2010) EDIT—The eco-design indicator tool. Envirowise, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlov L, Lofgren C, Soras A (2000) PACKAGING—a tool for the prevention of environmental impact. Packforsk, Kista

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenstein EV, Wellenreuther F (2010) LCA studies comparing beverage cartons and alternative packaging: can overall conclusions be drawn? Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(9):938–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manage 91(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall CAS, Cleveland CJ, Kaufmann R (1986) Energy and resource quality. Wiley Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller MC, Keoleian GA (2003) Assessing the sustainability of the US food system: a life cycle perspective. Agric Syst 76:1007–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan L, Thorpe S (2009) Issues in food miles and carbon labelling. ABARE Research report 09.18. ABARE, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang CC, Ma HW (2004) A multidimensional environmental evaluation of packaging materials. Sci Total Environ 324:161–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M, Jenkins G, Lu X, Turnpenny J, Mitchell T, Jones R, Lowe J, Murphy J, Hassell D, Boorman P, McDonald R, Hills S (2002) Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: the UKCIP02 scientific report. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Humbert S, Rossi V, Margni M, Jolliet O, Loerincik Y (2009) Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars vs plastic pots. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:96–106

    Google Scholar 

  • International Panel on Climate Change (2001) Climate change: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers, in climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution to Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • James K, Fitzpatrick L, Lewis H, Sonneveld K (2005) Sustainable packaging systems development. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Handbook of sustainability research. Peter Lang Scientific Publishing, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungbluth N, Tietje O, Scholz RW (2000) Food purchases: impacts from the consumer’s point of view investigated with a modular LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(3):134–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keoleian GA, Spitzley D (1999) Guidance for improving life cycle design and management of milk packaging. J Ind Ecol 3(1):111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S (1998) Life-cycle assessment of embodied energy for building materials-focused on high-rise apartments. In: Proceedings of the World Renewable Energy Congress (WREC), Florence, pp 1559–1562

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SG, Xu X (2004) A simplified life cycle assessment of re-usable and single-use bulk transit packaging. Packag Technol Sci 17:67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis H (2011) Designing for sustainability. In: Verghese K, Lewis H, Fitzpatrick L (eds) Packaging for sustainability. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis H, Sonneveld K, Fitzpatrick L, Nicol R (2002) Towards sustainable packaging. Discussion Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Madival S, Auras R, Singh SP, Narayan R (2009) Assessment of the environmental profile of PLA, PET and PS clamshell containers using LCA methodology. J Clean Prod 17:1183–1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muthu SS, Li Y, Hu JY, Mok PY (2009) An exploratory comparative study on eco-impact of paper and plastic bags. J Fiber Bioeng Inform 1(4):307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthu SS, Li Y, Hu JY, Mok PY (2011) Carbon footprint of shopping (grocery) bags in China, Hong Kong and India. Atmos Environ 45(2):469–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muthu SS, Li Y, Hu JY, Mok PY, Mao YF, Li QH, Wu XX (2013) Assessment of eco functional properties of shopping bags: development of a novel eco-functional tester. Int J Clothing Sci Technol 25(3):208–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Pimentel M (1996) Energy use in fruit, vegetavle and forage production. In: Pimentel D, Pimentel M (eds) Food, energy and society. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, pp 131–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP (2010) Sustainable packaging: threat or opportunity? PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Risch SJ (2009) Food packaging history and innovations. J Agric Food Chem 57:8089–8092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P, Nei D, Orikasa T, Xu Q, Okadome H, Nakamura N, Shiina T (2009) A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. J Food Eng 90:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori I, Hestnes AG (2007) Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy building: a review article. Energy Build 39:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayal M, Hastak M, Mullens M, Sweaney A (2006) United States-India collaborative research directions in urban housing and supporting infrastructure. J Archit Eng 12(4):163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott G (2000) Green polymers. Polym Degrad Stab 68:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastien H, Rossi V, Margni M, Jolliet O, Loerincik Y (2009) Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars vs plastic pots. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:96–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Saxena A, Sethi M, Shree V, Varun (2011) Life cycle assessment of a building: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:871–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Song JH, Murphy RJ, Narayan R, Davies GBH (2009) Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics. Philos Trans Royal Soc B 364:2127–2139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Packaging Alliance (2010) Rmit University, Helen Lewis Research, Birubi Innovation, Victoria University. SPA packaging sustainability framework. Sustainable Packaging Alliance, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Packaging Coalition (2006) Design guidelines for sustainable packaging, version 1. GreenBlue Institute, Charlottesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Talve S (2001) Life cycle assessment of a basic lager beer. Department of Environmental Engineering, Tallinn Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Toniolo S, Mazzi A, Niero M, Zuliani F, Scipioni A (2013) Comparative LCA to evaluate how much recycling is environmentally favorable for food packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 77:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Energy (1999) A. D. Little guide for evaluation of energy savings potential. Prepared for the office of Building Technology, State and Community Programs (BTS). US Department of Energy

    Google Scholar 

  • Verghese K (2008) Environmental assessment of food packaging and advanced methods for choosing the correct material. In: Chiellini E (ed) Environmentally compatible food packaging. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, p 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Verghese K, Lockrey S (2011) Selecting and applying tools. In: Verghese K, Lewis H, Fitzpatrick L (eds) Packaging for sustainability. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Verghese K, Horne R, Carre A (2010) PIQET: the design and development of an online ‘streamlined’ LCA tool for sustainable packaging design decision support. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(6):608–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verghese K, Lewis H, Fitzpatrick L (eds) (2011) Packaging for sustainability. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Verghese K, Lewis H, Lockrey S, Williams H (2013) The role of packaging in minimising food waste in the supply chain of the future. Report; CHEP Australia; Issue: 3.0

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmart (2008) Sustainability Scorecard FAQs

    Google Scholar 

  • White P (2009) Building a sustainability strategy into the business. Corp Gov 4:386–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams H, Wikstrom F, Lofgren MA (2008) Life cycle perspective on environmental effects on customer focused packaging development. J Clean Prod 16:853–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • www.cadburyinvestors.com Stitzer, T. Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

  • www.defra.gov.uk. DEFRA, 2006 .Food industry sustainability strategy

  • www.packagingconnections.com. Life cycle assessment of “Container Glass and Comparison with Alternate Packaging Mediums”

  • www.transperancymarketreserach.com. Report: Green Packaging Market-Global Industry Analysis. Trend, Size, Share and Forecast 2015–2021

Bibliography

  • Boylston S (2009) Designing Sustainable Packaging. Laurence King Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiellini E (2008) Environmentally compatible food packaging. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedlicka W (2009) Packaging sustainability. Tools, systems and strategies for innovative package design. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling S (2007) Field guide to sustainable packaging. Summit Publishing, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Packaging Coalition (2006) Design guidelines for sustainable packaging, version 1. GreenBlue Institute, Charlottesville

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, 177005, India

    Varun

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, 144806, India

    Aashish Sharma

  3. THDC Institute of Hydropower Engineering and Technology, Bhagirathipuram, Tehri, Uttarakhand, 249124, India

    Himanshu Nautiyal

Authors
  1. Varun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aashish Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Himanshu Nautiyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Manhattan Centre 8/F, Global Sustainability Services SGS Hong Kong Limited, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Varun, Sharma, A., Nautiyal, H. (2016). Environmental Impacts of Packaging Materials. In: Muthu, S. (eds) Environmental Footprints of Packaging. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-913-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation