Skip to main content

Islam Can Give a Proper Orientation to Science and Technology Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Islamic Perspectives on Science and Technology

Abstract

In this article, the issue of how Islam can give a proper orientation to science and technology is considered. The position is first taken that science has a longitudinal relationship with religion, i.e. scientific activity is a specific kind of religious activity and the Islamic worldview engenders a suitable comprehensive framework for scientific work and its applications. This provides five roles for religion in scientific activity: firstly, it gives an impetus for the exploration of nature as the Handiwork of God; secondly, it provides a metaphysical basis for science; thirdly, it supplies a suitable epistemology for science; fourthly, it answers questions which are brought up in science, but science per se cannot answer; and finally, it gives a proper direction to applied science and technology (S&T). Under the inclusive Islamic worldview, S&T should be used for understanding God’s magnificent creation and for securing human felicity at both the individual and societal levels. Some policy recommendations are provided for S&T development in the Islamic world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Suyuti. (n.d.). Al-Jami’ al-Saghir min Hadith al-Bashir al-Nazir (Vol. 1). Damascus: Maktabah al-Halbuni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (1984). Superforce: The search for a grand unified theory of nature. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (1993). The mind of God. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1998). The blind watchmaker. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Espagnat, B. (1987). Veiled reality. In P. Lahti & P. Mittelstaedt (Eds.), Symposium on the foundations of modern physics. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, F. (2000). New mysteries: The price and promise of human progress. Science and Spirit, 11(3), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golshani, M. (2011). The Holy Qur’an and the sciences of nature. Selangor: Amin Research and Cultural Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaki, S. (1992). The relevance of physics. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Templeton Foundation. (2006). John D. Barrow wins 2006 Templeton prize. http://www.templetonprize.org/tpbarrow.html. Accessed 5 May 2015.

  • John Templeton Foundation. (n.d.). Does the universe have a purpose? A Templeton conversation. http://www.templeton.org/purpose/pdfs/bq_universe.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2015.

  • Levy, R. (1967). The social structure of Islam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde, A. (1998, July 9). The Christian Science Monitor Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margeneau, H., & Varghese, R. (1992). Cosmos, bios, theos. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N. (2008). Do we need a scientific revolution? Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry, 8(3), 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar, P. (1984). The limits of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J. (1974). Chance and necessity: An essay on the natural philosophy of biology. New York: Knopf.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Planck, M. (1932). Where is science going (trans: Murphy, J.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1978). Natural selection and the emergence of mind. Dialectica, 32, 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1987). Natural selection and the emergence of mind. In G. Radnitzky., & W. Bartley (Eds.), Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1924). ICARUS or the future of science. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Tubner & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, T. D., & Gomatam, R. (Eds.). (1987). Synthesis of science and religion. Bombay: The Bhaktivedanta Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, M. (2004). How to relate science and religion. Cambridge: W. B. Edermans Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townes, C. H. (1966) The convergence of science and religion. Zygon, 1(3), 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S. (1993). The first three minutes: A modern view of the origin of the universe. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Golshani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Golshani, M. (2016). Islam Can Give a Proper Orientation to Science and Technology Development. In: Kamali, M., Bakar, O., Batchelor, DF., Hashim, R. (eds) Islamic Perspectives on Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-778-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-778-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-777-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-778-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics