Abstract
There is a general understanding that mathematics is not popular or well-liked among students and people in general. In this chapter we report on findings of t-tests and ANOVAs from a large quantitative New Zealand study (n = 1784) which investigated the affective responses of students vis-à-vis gender, cultural identity, socio-economic status (SES) and type of school. The analysis revealed that: while males liked mathematics more than females, females liked school more; Maori and Pasifika students were more positive towards mathematics, but more likely to have a traditional belief and more anxiety; and, students from lower SES backgrounds were less positive in their affective responses to mathematics and mathematics education. These findings reflect many of the results of previous studies, indicating that some long-standing concerns still remain and these views are deeply ingrained in society, and therefore, demand attention.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A related study that employed some of the same data as reported here was reported in Grootenboer and Hemmings (2007).
- 2.
- 3.
The work of Boaler is much broader than just affective issues in mathematics education.
References
Ai, X. (2002). Gender differences in growth in mathematics achievement: Three-level longitudinal and multilevel analyses of individual, home, and school influences. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(1), 1–22.
Antonnen, R. G. (1969). A longitudinal study in mathematics attitude. The Journal of Educational Research, 62, 467–471.
Atweh, B., Meaney, T., McMurchy-Pilkington, C., Neyland, J., & Trinick, T. (2004). Social justice and sociocultural perspectives in mathematics education. In B. Perry, C. Diezmann, & G. Anthony (Eds.), Review of mathematics education in Australasia 2000–2003 (pp. 29–52). Sydney: Postpressed.
Barkatsas, A. (2005). A new scale for monitoring students’ attitudes to learning mathematics with technology. In P. Clarkson, A. Downtown, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Theory, Research and Practice, Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 129–135). Sydney: MERGA.
Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608–645.
Bouchey, H. A., & Harter, S. (2005). Reflected appraisals, academic perceptions, and math/science performance during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 673–686.
Crooks, T., & Flockton, L. (2002). Mathematics assessment results 2001: National education monitoring report 23. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1978). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement and related factors: A further study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 189–203.
Garden, R. A. (1997). Mathematics and science performance in middle primary school: Results from New Zealand’s participation in the third international mathematics and science Study. Wellington, NZ: Research and International Section, Ministry of Education.
Grootenboer, P. (2010). Effective features of the maths in the Kimberley inclusive pedagogy model. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Fremantle (pp. 736–739). Fremantle, WA: MERGA.
Grootenboer, P. J., & Hemmings, B. (2007). Mathematics performance and the role played by affective and background factors. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(3), 3–20.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 299–324.
Leder, G. C. (1992). Mathematics and gender: Changing perspectives. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 597–622). New York: Macmillan.
Lokan, J., Greenwood, L., & Cresswell, J. (2001). 15-up and counting, reading, writing, reasoning… How literate are Australia’s students? The PISA 2000 survey of students’ reading, mathematical and scientific literacy skills. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Ma, X. (1997). Reciprocal relationships between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(4), 221–229.
Marcou, A., & Philippou, G. (2005). Motivational beliefs, self-regulated learning and mathematical problem solving. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 297–304). Melbourne: PME.
Marks, G., McMillan, J., & Hillman, K. (2001). Tertiary entrance performance: the role of student background and school factors LSAY Research Reports. Longitudinal surveys of Australian youth research report; n.22. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/lsay_research/24.
May, S. (2003, December). Some factors underlying high and low achievement in PISA 2000. In Paper presented at the NZARE/AARE Conference, University of Auckland, NZ.
Mullins, I. V, Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E .J., Gregory, K. D., Garden, R. A., O’Conner, K. M., Chrostowski, S. J., & Smith, T. A. (2000). TIMMS 1999 international mathematics report. Findings of the IEA’s repeat of the third International mathematics and science study at the eighth grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Niesche, R., Grootenboer, P., Jorgensen, R., & Sullivan, P. (2010). The maths in the Kimberley project: An overview. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the Future of Mathematics Education, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Fremantle (pp. 732–735). Fremantle, WA: MERGA.
Peard, R. (2002). Socioeconomic background and pupil achievement in mathematics. In D. Edge & B. H. Yeap (Eds.), Mathematics Education for A Knowledge-Based Era, Proceedings of the 2nd East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education and 9th Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematics Education, Singapore (Vol. 2, pp. 21–27). Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Plenty, S., & Heubeck, B. G. (2013). A multidimensional analysis of changes in mathematics motivation and engagement during high school. Educational Psychology, 33(1), 14–30.
Rothman, S., & McMillan, J. (2003). Influences on achievement in literacy and numeracy. LSAY Research Report Number 36. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Institutional and student factors and their influence on advanced mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 274–286.
Spangler, D. A. (1992). Assessing students’ beliefs about mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 39, 109–113.
Statistics New Zealand (2013a). 2013 Census quickstats about Māori. www.stats.govt.nz.
Statistics New Zealand (2013b). 2013 Census tables. www.stats.govt.nz.
Walker, M., & Chamberlain, M. (1999). A brief overview of the third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) including the conceptual framework for the study, sampling procedures, and a summary of key results for New Zealand. The Research Bulletin, 10(October), 41–55.
Young-Loveridge, J. (1992). Attitudes towards mathematics: Insights into the thoughts and feelings of nine-year-olds. In B. Bell, A. Begg, F. Biddulph, M. Carr, M. Carr, J. McChesney, & J. Young-Loveridge (Eds.), SAMEpapers 1992 (pp. 90–116). Hamilton, NZ: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grootenboer, P., Marshman, M. (2016). Differences in the Affective Responses of Various Groups. In: Mathematics, Affect and Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-679-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-679-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-678-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-679-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)