Skip to main content

The Quest for Regional Education Hub Status: Challenges, Possibilities and Search for New Governance in Hong Kong

  • Chapter
Internationalization of Higher Education

Part of the book series: Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects ((EDAP,volume 28))

Abstract

The growing global interdependence has been recognized within higher education circles for decades, usually seen as “international education” and having its primary manifestation in student and faculty exchanges between countries. Over the last decade, especially after reaching the GATS agreement, higher education has been refined in part as a tradable commodity, and the amount of “globalized education” taking place is on the increase. With the strong intention of enhancing the global competitiveness of their higher education systems, governments across different parts of the world, especially in Asia, have engaged in the quest for different forms of hub status such as education hub, student hub, talent hub, and knowledge/information hub. Transnational higher education has become increasingly popular in Asian societies. Some Asian governments have invited foreign universities to set up their campuses to provide transnational education programs, while others have engaged in the quest for regional education hub status. The quest to become a regional hub of education inevitably leads to a new terrain of governance, complex and sometimes convoluted, which involves problems of coordination (and accountability and transparency), especially when dealing with multinational businesses, but which can bring to the state benefits in terms of flexibilities and forms of flexibilization and substitution which are not normally possible in administrative systems. This chapter sets out against this wider policy context to critically examine how Hong Kong stands in the journey toward making the city-state a regional education hub (When referring to “education hub” here, we adopt the definition by Knight that “an education hub is a planned effort to build a critical mass of local and international actors strategically engaged in crossborder education, training, knowledge production and innovation initiatives” (Knight, J Stud Int Educ 15(3):221–240, 2011, p. 277)), with particular reference to examining the major challenges and possibilities, as well as the implications, for university governance with the rise of transnational education programs and proliferation of providers in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The positioning of Hong Kong as Asia’s world city was first put forward by the then Chief Executive Tung Chee Hwa in his 1999 Policy Address. Subsequently, the Brand Hong Kong program was launched in May 2001 to promotion Hong Kong internationally as Asia’s world city. Though some may simply sniff at the claim as somewhat exaggerated, the Time magazine, in January 2008, did accredit the city of Hong Kong together with New York and London as the three exemplars for and explanations of globalization (“A Tale of Three Cities,” 17 January 2008).

  2. 2.

    Since the issue of the Higher Education Review 2002, the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) between Hong Kong and Mainland China was signed on 29 June 2003 and brought into force. Hong Kong political leaders, thereafter, have worked toward the policy direction of broadening and deepening its collaboration with Mainland China—particularly with Pearl River Delta—across all fronts, including education.

  3. 3.

    For instance, there were 7,293 nonlocal students enrolled in the UGC-funded institutions in the academic year 2007/08, while 2,811 others attended various programs at different higher education institutions on a self-financed basis. For the former, only 542 of them (7 %) were students who came from countries other than the Mainland China; while for the later, only 619 of them (22 %) were non-Mainland Chinese (Cheng et al., 2009: 41 & 45).

  4. 4.

    These six areas are educational services, medical services, testing and certification, environmental industry, innovation and technology, and finally, cultural and creative industries (Task Force on Economic Challenges, Hong Kong , 2009).

  5. 5.

    The budget cuts on government funding in higher education from 1999 to 2004, in particular, had driven the higher education sector in Hong Kong to look to the market for additional funding.

  6. 6.

    Statistics provided by the Information Portal for Accredited Self-financing Post-secondary Programmes (IPASS), HKSAR: http://www.ipass.gov.hk/eng/stat_pg_index.aspx (Accessed on 20 Jan 2015).

  7. 7.

    HKU SPACE refers to the School of Professional and Continuing Education, the University of Hong Kong .

  8. 8.

    For instance, in its preamble, the code of practice clearly states that it has “no mandatory effect and institutions should be able to put in place policies and guidelines to reflect their own mission and philosophy” (HKCAAVQ, 2007: 1).

  9. 9.

    EDB was previously the “Education and Manpower Bureau” (EMB). Its manpower portfolio was transferred to the new Labour and Welfare Bureau in July 2007 thus streamlined to become the Education Bureau.

  10. 10.

    HKCAAVQ is a rather new statutory body established under the HKCAAVQ Ordinance (Chapter 1150) which came into effect on October 1, 2007. It was previously the “Hong Kong Council for Academic Accreditation” (HKCAA). The new HKCAAVQ is appointed by the Secretary for Education as the Accreditation Authority and Qualifications Register (QR) Authority under the current Qualifications Framework (QF).

  11. 11.

    Statistics provided by the official website of Education Bureau, HKSAR: http://www.edb.gov.hk/en/edu-system/postsecondary/non-local-higher-professional-edu/stat-info/index.html (Last accessed on 17 January 2015).

  12. 12.

    The Qualifications Framework is a cross-sectoral hierarchy of qualifications (seven levels in total) covering both academic and vocational qualifications required by various industries.

  13. 13.

    The Qualifications Register is a centralized online database on qualifications, learning programs, as well as their providers/operators.

  14. 14.

    The eight UGC-funded institutions are: City University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong Baptist University, Lingnan University, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, the Hong Kong Institute of Education, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, and the University of Hong Kong. Among them, the Hong Kong Institute of Education’s self-accrediting status is applicable to its teacher education programs only.

  15. 15.

    Information from the section on “quality-assurance mechanism,” official website of the Qualifications Framework, Education Bureau, HKSAR: http://www.hkqf.gov.hk/guie/QA_mech.asp (Last Assessed on 13 September 2009).

    It is also worth noting that since all these UGC-funded institutions have today been increasingly involved in the provision of self-financing sub-degree programs, they have formed a Joint Quality Review Committee (JQRC) to oversee the quality of such programs and to assess these programs for classification onto the QR. (Information retrieved from the same section.).

  16. 16.

    Information from the Q&A section regarding “nonlocal higher and professional courses,” official website of the Education Bureau, HKSAR: http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?langno=1&nodeid=1251 (Last accessed 13 September 2009).

  17. 17.

    These institutions are: Hong Kong Shue Yan University, the Hong Kong Academy for Performing Arts, and the Open University of Hong Kong.

  18. 18.

    This is the statement that all advertisements of registered or exempted courses, by regulation, should contain.

  19. 19.

    Q&A section regarding “nonlocal higher and professional courses,” official website of the Education Bureau, HKSAR: http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?langno=1&nodeid=1251 (Last accessed 13 September 2009).

  20. 20.

    The most recent example is the launch of Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme by the Research Grants Council (RGC) in 2009. The Fellowship will provide a monthly stipend of HK$20,000, as well as a conference and research-related travel allowance of HK$10,000 per year for a maximum period of three years. A total of 135 PhD Fellowships will be awarded for the 2010/2011 academic year.

References

  • Chan, D. K. K. (2008, December 10–11). Global Agenda, local response: Changing university governance and academic reflections in Hong Kong’s Higher Education. Paper presented at the symposium on Positioning University in the Globalized World: Changing Governance and Coping Strategies in Asia, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. K. K., & Lo, W. (2007). Running universities as enterprises: University governance Changes in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 27(3), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. K. K., & Lo, W. (2008). University restructuring in East Asia: Trends, challenges and prospects. Policy Futures in Education, 6(5), 641–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. K. K., & Ng, P. T. (2008). Developing transnational higher education: Comparing the approaches of Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Educational Reform, 17(3), 291–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C., Ng, S. W., Cheung, A. C. K., Choi, P. L., Tang, Y. F. & Yuen, Y. M. (2009). A technical research report on the development of Hong Kong as a regional education hub. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou, L., & Knight, J. (2014). Emerging hubs: South Korea, Sri Lanka, Mauritius and Bahrain. In J. Knight (Ed.), International education hubs. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • East–west Centre. (2010, September 13–24). The IFE 2020 tool kit. Paper presented at the International For Education 2010 Leadership Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Bureau. (2015a). List of exempted courses. http://www.edb.gov.hk/en/edu-system/postsecondary/non-local-higher-professional-edu/course/exempted-course.html

  • Education Bureau. (2015b). Statistical information. Education commission (2000). Review of Education System Reform Proposal: Excel and Grow. Hong Kong: Government Printer. http://www.edb.gov.hk/en/edu-system/postsecondary/non-local-higher-professional-edu/stat-info/index.html

  • Education Commission. (2000) Education Reform in Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, N. J. (1999). Transnational education—Competition or complementarity: The case of Hong Kong. Higher Education in Europe, 24(2), 219–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Council for Accreditation of Academic and Vocational Qualifications (HKCAAVQ). (2007, December). Code of practice for non-local courses recommended by the Hong Kong Council for accreditation of academic and vocational qualifications. Hong Kong: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Council for Accreditation of Academic and Vocational Qualifications (HKCAAVQ). (2008, May). Guidelines on four-stage quality assurance process under the qualifications framework: QF Levels 1–3 (Version 1.0). Hong Kong: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Portal for Accredited Post-secondary Programs. (2013). Full-time accredited self-financing post-secondary programs, 2004/05 to 2013/14 Academic Years. http://www.ipass.gov.hk/edb/index.php/en/home/statheader/stat/stat_pg_index

  • Knight, J. (2002). Trade talk: An analysis of the impact of trade liberalization and the general agreement on trade in services on higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 6(3), 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (2011). Education hubs: A fad, a brand or an innovation. Journal for Studies in International Education, 15(3), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (Ed.). (2014). International education hubs. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (1993). Socio-political governance: Introduction. In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance: New government-society interactions (pp. 1–8). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, A., & Maclean, R. (2014). Managing human capital in world cities: Reflections on Hong Kong developing into an education hub. In K. H. Mok & K. M. Yu (Eds.), Internationalization of Higher Education in East Asia. (pp. 42–57). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi–Faur, D. (1998). The competition state as a Neo–Mercantilist state: Understanding the restructuring of national and global telecommunications. Journal of Socio–Economics, 27(6), 655–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBurnie, G., & Ziguras, C. (2001). The regulation of transnational higher education in Southeast Asia: Case studies of Hong Kong. Malaysia and Australia. Higher Education, 42, 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2008a). Varieties of regulatory regimes in Asia: The liberalization of the higher education market and changing governance in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. The Pacific Review, 21(2), 147–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2008b). Positioning as regional hub of higher education: Changing governance and regulatory reforms in Singapore and Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Reform, 17(3), 230–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, Ka Ho. (2010). The changing role of university in promoting entrepreneurship and innovation: A comparative study of selected Asian economies. Paper published on-line at the World Bank website.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2011). The quest for regional hub of education: Growing Heterarchies, organizational hybridization and new governance in Singapore and Malaysia. Journal of Education Policy, 26(1), 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2012). International benchmarking with the best: The varied role of the state in the quest for regional education hubs in Malaysia and Hong Kong. In F. Waldow & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), Policy borrowing and lending in education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2013). The quest for entrepreneurial universities in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H., & Bodycott, P. (2014). Hong Kong: The quest for regional education hub status. In J. Knight (Ed.), International education hubs. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H., & Ong, K. C. (2012). Asserting brain power and expanding educational service: Searching for new governance and regulatory regimes in Singapore and Hong Kong. In D. E. Neubauer (Ed.), The emergent knowledge society and the future of higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H., & Yu, K. M. (Eds.). (2014). Internationalization of higher education in East Asia. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu, R., Ho, K.-C., & Yeoh, B. S. A. (2014). Singapore: Building a knowledge and education hub. In J. Knight (Ed.), International education hubs. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Task Force on Economic Challenges, Hong Kong. (2009, June 22). Recommendations from the task force on economic challenges for promoting the development of the six economic areas. Hong Kong: Author. http://www.fso.gov.hk/tfec/eng/doc/TFEC%20-%20final%20Recommendations%20_TFEC-INFO-13_%20_Eng_.pdf. Accessed on 30 Aug 2009.

  • Tsang, D. Y. K. (2007). The 2007–2008 policy address: The new direction for Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwa, T. C. (2000). The 2000 policy address: Quality education, policy objective for education and manpower bureau. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO/Council of Europe. (2001). Code of good practice in the provision of transnational education. Riga, Latvia: UNESCO-CEPES. http://www.cepes.ro/hed/recogn/groups/transnat/code.htm. Accessed on 29 Aug 2009.

  • University Grants Committee (UGC). (2002). Higher education in Hong Kong: Report of the University Grants committee. Hong Kong: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee (UGC). (2004a). Hong Kong higher education: To make a difference, to move with the times. Hong Kong: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee (UGC). (2004b). Hong Kong higher education integration matters: A report of the institutional integration working party of the University Grants Committee. Hong Kong: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee (UGC). (2013). Higher education in Hong Kong: Report of the University Grants Committee. Hong Kong: Author. http://cdcf.ugc.edu.hk/cdcf/searchStatSiteReport.do

  • Yang, R. (2006). Transnational higher education in Hong Kong: An analysis. In H. Futao (Ed.), Transnational higher education in Asia and the Pacific Region (pp. 41–67). Hiroshima, Japan: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ka Ho Mok .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Note This chapter is a revised and updated version of the author’s previous publication in 2012. Thanks go to the Research Grant Council of the HKSAR Government in support of the project “A Comparative Study of Transnational Higher Education Policy and Governance in Hong Kong , Shenzhen China, and Singapore ” (HKIEd7005-PPR-6).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mok, K.H. (2016). The Quest for Regional Education Hub Status: Challenges, Possibilities and Search for New Governance in Hong Kong. In: Cheng, Y., Cheung, A., Ng, S. (eds) Internationalization of Higher Education. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 28. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-667-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-667-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-666-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-667-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics