Skip to main content

Abstract

This case study aimed to gain insights into plagiarism among postgraduate students. It examined the extent of plagiarism, sources of plagiarism, types of plagiarism and causes of plagiarism among four students from the Master in Education in Teaching English as a Second Language (M.Ed TESL) programme in a public university in Malaysia. The instruments were written assignments, interview and self-reflection reports. The extent of plagiarism and the sources of plagiarism were facilitated through the use of Turnitin software. Analysis of participants’ writing and original sources was done to determine the types of plagiarism in the students’ writing. The findings showed that plagiarism existed in the students’ writing. They plagiarized mainly from Internet, publications and students’ paper and the types of plagiarism found were sham, verbatim, illicit and patchwriting. Data from interviews and self-reflection reports which were qualitatively analysed indicated that personal voice, time management, language proficiency and academic writing skills caused plagiarism. The findings imply that awareness of plagiarism should be instilled at postgraduate level. Postgraduate students should also be guided by the faculty in enhancing their academic writing skills. This can increase self-efficacy to deter plagiarism in line with Bandura’s self-efficacy theory highlighted in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abasi, A. R., & Akbari, N. (2008). Are we encouraging patchwriting? Reconsidering the role of the pedagogical context in ESL student writers’ transgressive intertextuality. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 27, 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah, N. A., & Muhammad, A. M. (2008). Are we there yet? ESL postgraduates writing in an English medium. Shah Alam: Academy of Language Studies, UniversitiTeknologi Mara. Retrieved from http://api.ning.com/files/X5tEBcXJEAsn5r4V7-3CNT4n0Qz-5OBNfsgijXWwbD6Rzw*9-GYK0qPuQ0eD6QPm0ahlbJtCpEV6z3r0hR-N1V3VG5g0haav/AbdullahandMuhammed_Arewethereyet.pdf

  • Al-Zubaidi, K., & Richards, C. (2010). Arab postgraduate students in Malaysia: Identifying and overcoming the cultural and language barriers. Arab World English Journal, 1(1), 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ange’lil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen language?: Plagiarism in writing. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkoudis, S., & Tran, L. (2010). Writing blah, blah, blah: Lecturers’ approaches and challenges in supporting international students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, J., Hashim, F., & Razak, N. A. (2011). Students’ strategies and patterns of plagiarism: Academic writing in the Internet age. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 6, 391–397. Retrieved from http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/medwelljournals/rjasci/2011/391-397.pdf

  • Aziz, J., Hashim, F., & Razak, N. A. (2012). Anecdotes of plagiarism: Some pedagogical issues and considerations. Asian Social Science, 8(10), 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C., & Pieterick, J. (2008). Finding a new voice: Challenges facing international (and home!) students writing university assignments in the UK. Retrieved from http://wlv.openrepository.com/wlv/bitstream/2436/98516/1/cb-jp_final_edit.pdf

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (2002). A handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giridharan, B., & Robson, A. (2011). Identifying gaps in academic writing of ESL students. Retrieved from http://www.curtin.edu.my/tl2011/download/papers/refereed/Identifying%20gaps%20in%20academic%20writing%20of%20ESL%20students.pdf

  • Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakh, S. Y., & Wan Mansor, W. F. A. (2012). The factors that result in unintentional plagiarism in postgraduate non-native students’ written productions. In Proceeding of the 7th Malaysia international conference on languages, literatures and cultures. Universiti Putra Malaysia. Retrieved from www.fbmk.upm.edu.my/micollac/proceedings

  • Lee, Nancy Shzh-chen, & Tajino, A. (2008). Understanding students’ perceptions of difficulty with academic writing for teacher development: A case study of the university of Tokyo writing program. Retrieved from http://www.highedu.kyoto-u.ac.jp/publication/data/kiyou14/01_nancy.pdf

  • Maxwell, A., Curtis, G. J., & Vardanega, L. (2008). Does culture influence understanding and perceived seriousness of plagiarism. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 4(2), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, G., & Rogerson, A. M. (2009). Links are not enough: Using originality reports to improve academic standards, compliance and learning outcomes among postgraduate students. International Journal Education Integrity, 5(2), 47–57. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/gsbpapers/28

  • McCullough, M., & Holmberg, M. (2005). Using the Google search engine to detect word-for-word plagiarism in master’s theses: A preliminary study. College Student Journal, 39, 435–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi, H. S., & Kashefian-Naeeini, S. (2011). Academic writing problems of Iranian post-graduate students at National University of Malaysia (UKM). European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(4). Retrieved from http://www.eurojournals.com/EJSS_23_4_08.pdf

  • Ogilvie, J., & Stewart, A. (2010). The integration of rational choice and self-efficacy theories: A situational analysis of student misconduct. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 1, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, W. H., & Abu Bakar, A. L. (2009). Learning to write an academic paper among medical students of university Malaysia Sabah. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning (ICTL 2009) INTI University College, Malaysia, 2, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. Retrieved from http://www.education.com/reference/article/self-efficacy-theory/

  • Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of writing self-efficacy beliefs on the writing performance of upper elementary students. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2006). Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 4–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy, P. (2009, September 17). Plagiarism most endemic academic fraud. The Sun Daily. Retrieved from http://www.thesundaily.my/node/151219

  • Riasati, M. J., & Rahimi, F. (2013). Why do Iranian postgraduate students plagiarize? A qualitative investigation. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(3), 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. (2000). A guide to teaching international students. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford Brookes University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafie, L. A., & Nayan, S. (2012). The net generation and academic dishonesty in Malaysia. Technology Innovations in Education, 181–186. Retrieved from http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2012/Porto/EDUTE/EDUTE-28.pdf

  • Ting, S.-H. (2013). Academic writing: Citation is troublesome and plagiarism is no big deal. Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Science Research, 1533–1542. Retrieved from http://worldconferences.net/proceedings/icssr2013/toc/382%20-%20Su-Hie%20-%20ACADEMIC%20WRITING%20CITATION%20IS%2

  • Ting, S.-H., Musa, M. K., & Mah, F. S.-F. (2014). Plagiarism norms and practices in coursework assignments. International Journal of Education, 6(1), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieyra, M., Strickland, D., & Timmerman, B. (2013). Patterns in plagiarism and patchwriting in science and engineering graduate students’ research proposal. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 9(1), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. B. (2005), Plagiarism: Deterrence, prevention and detection. In The handbook for economics lecturers (pp. 1–20). Retrieved from http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/handbook/printable/plagiarism.pdf

  • Yusof, D. S., & Masrom, U. K. (2011). Malaysian students’ understanding of plagiarism. The International Journal – Language Society and Culture, 33, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafarghandi, A. M., Khoshroo, F., & Barkat, B. (2012). An investigation of Iranian Masters students’ perceptions of plagiarism. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 8(2), 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aisyah Hani Mohd Habali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mohd Habali, A.H., Fong, L.L. (2016). Plagiarism in Academic Writing Among TESL Postgraduate Students: A Case Study. In: Fook, C., Sidhu, G., Narasuman, S., Fong, L., Abdul Rahman, S. (eds) 7th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2014) Proceedings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_57

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-663-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-664-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics