Is It Possible to Integrate Disaster Governance into Urbanization? Evidence from Chinese Townships Hit by 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake and 2013 Lushan Earthquake

  • Qiang ZhangEmail author
  • Yameng Hu
  • Qibin Lu


This research contributes to fill the void in the knowledge of the evolution of disaster governance of Asia during urban transition, by studying the changes of disaster risk management (DRM) capacities of townships in southwestern China. These townships have particular significance in China’s urban spectrum. While a number of townships were hard hit twice by 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake and 2013 Lushan Earthquake, it was a precious opportunity to examine the effect of integrating disaster governance into sustainable urbanization. The Wenchuan Reconstruction Plan had claimed the goal of building DRM capacity along the urbanization process of the post-disaster areas during the 5 years. This research finds that although with tremendous efforts, the fundamental issues of DRM remained unsettled in 2013 due to a failure of integrating the two policy systems of urbanization and disaster governance. The major contributions of this research are to link disaster governance and urbanization through DRM Capacity Framework and to put forward a new framework for forming a coalition between urbanization and disaster governance guided by governance approaches in strategic, policy, and program levels.


Disaster governance Urbanization Wenchuan Earthquake Lushan Earthquake 


  1. Adger, W. N., Hughes, T. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., & Rockström, J. (2005). Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 309(5737), 1036–1039.Google Scholar
  2. Ahrensn, J., & Rudolph, P. M. (2006). The importance of governance in risk reduction and disaster management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 14(4), 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assmuth, T., Hildén, M., & Benighaus, C. (2010). Integrated risk assessment and risk governance as socio-political phenomena: A synthetic view of the challenges. Science of the Total Environment, 408, 3943–3953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, D., & Refsgaard, K. (2007). Institutional development and scale matching in disaster response management. Ecological Economics, 63(2), 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benouar, D. (2002, December 9–11). The need for an integrated disaster management strategy in North Africa towards poverty reduction: A case study of Algiers (Algeria). Paper presented at the urban development for poverty reduction- towards a research agenda, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Berke, R. P., Kartez, J., & Wenger, D.R. (1993). Recovery after disaster: Achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters, 17(2), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes, F. (2007). Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: Lessons from resilience thinking. Natural Hazards, 41(2), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackburn, S. (2014). The politics of scale and disaster risk governance: Barriers to decentralisation in Portland, Jamaica. Geoforum, 52, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brennan, T. (2003, December 2–4). Mainstreaming disaster risk management: Some possible steps. Paper presented at the international conference on total disaster risk management, Kobe, Japan.Google Scholar
  10. Burby, J.R., & Linda, C.D. (1994). Plans can matter! The role of land use plans and state planning mandates in limiting the development of hazardous areas. Public Administration Review, 54(3), 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christensen, T. W. (2009). Crisis leadership: A study of leadership practice. Doctoral dissertation, Capella University.Google Scholar
  12. Craye, M., Funtowicz, S., & Van Der Sluijs, J. P. (2009). A reflexive approach to dealing with uncertainties in environmental health risk science and policy. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 5, 216–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Djalante, R., Holley, C., & Thomalla, F. (2011). Adaptive governance and managing resilience to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2(4), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fang, C., Li, M., & Wu, F. (2009). Analysis on urbanization and the spatial differentiation and flow of the migrant workers in Wenchuan earthquake-stricken regions. Journal of Mountain Science, 126(4), 482–489.Google Scholar
  15. Federal Emergency Management Agency and National Emergency Management Association. (2001). State capability assessment for readiness. Washington, DC: The Agency Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, S., & Surminski, S. (2012). The roles of public and private actors in the governance of adaptation: The case of agricultural insurance in India. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy working paper no. 102. Accessed 14 Nov 2013.
  17. Gao, X. (2008). Achievements and development in construction of emergency management system with Chinese characteristics. Chinese Public Administration, 11, 18–24.Google Scholar
  18. Gopalakrishnan, C., & Odaka, N. (2007). Designing new institutions for implementing integrated disaster risk management: Key elements and future directions. Disasters, 31(4), 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hou, J., & Yang, Y. (2008). Xiangcaixianguan’s effect on township financial expenditure. Journal of Public Management, 5, 61–67.Google Scholar
  20. Ikeda, S. (2006). An integrated risk analysis framework for emerging disaster risks: Toward a better risk management of flood disaster in urban communities. In S. Ikeda, T. Fukuzono & T. Sato (Eds.), A better integrated management of disaster risks: Toward resilient society to emerging disaster risks in mega-cities (pp. 1–21). Tokyo: Terra Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2012). Glossary of terms. In C.B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S.K. Allen, M. Tignor & P.M. Midgley (Eds.), Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (pp. 555–564). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Janssen, M. (2010). Advances in multi-agency disaster management: Key elements in disaster research. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jin, C. (2007). Beichuan statistics year book 2007. Bureau of Statistics of Beichuan, Beichuan.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, G.F. (2005). Taking stock: The normative foundations of positivist and non-positivist policy analysis and ethical implications of the emergent risk society. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 7, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, S., Aryal, K., & Collins, A. (2013). Local level governance of risk and resilience in Nepal. Disasters, 37(3), 442–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, J. K., Sharman, R., Rao, H. R., & Upadhyaya, S. (2007). Efficiency of critical incident management systems: Instrument development and validation. Decision Support Systems, 44(1), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lall, S., Wang, H.G. (2012). China urbanization review: Balancing urban transformation and spatial inclusion. An eye on East Asia and Pacific, no. 6. Washington, DC: World Bank. Accessed 12 Apr 2014.Google Scholar
  28. Li, X. (2012). Several important issues on China’s urbanization. In: Urban China initiative annual forum, 9 September 2012, Beijing.Google Scholar
  29. Manyena, S. B. (2006). The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters, 30(4), 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Melé, D. (2003). Organizational humanizing cultures: Do they generate social capital? Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1–2), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mili, L. (2003). Mitigating the vulnerability of critical infrastructure in developing countries. In A. Kreimer, M. Arnold, & A. Carlin (Eds.), Building safer cities: The future of disaster risk (pp. 273–288). Washington, DC:World Bank.Google Scholar
  32. Naess, L. O., Bang, G., Eriksen, S., & Vevatne, J. (2005). Institutional adaptation to climate change: Flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nagasaka, T. (2006). New mode of risk governance enhanced by an e-community platform. In S. Ikeda, T. Fukuzono, & T. Sato (Eds.), A better integrated management of disaster risks: Toward resilient society to emerging disaster risks in mega-cities (pp. 89–107). Tokyo: Terra Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  34. National Development and Reform Commission. (2014). National new-type urbanization plan (2014–2020). Assessed 12 Apr 2014
  35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Disaster risk assessment and risk financing: A G20/OECD methodological framework. Accessed 14 Oct 2013.
  36. Overseas Development Institute. (2012). Disaster risk management in post-2015 development goals: Potential targets and indicators. Accessed 10 Dec 2013.
  37. Pan, J., & Wei, H. (2010). Annual report of urban development of China. China: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2001). Disasters and communities: Vulnerability, resilience, and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management 10(4), 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pelling, M., & Dill, K, (2010). Disaster politics: Tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes. Progress in Human Geography, 34(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pelling, M., & High, C. (2005a). Social learning and adaptation to climate change. Benfield Hazard Research Centre Disaster Studies Working Paper, 11, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  41. Pelling, M., & High, C. (2005b). Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 308–319.Google Scholar
  42. Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shi, P., et al. (2011). Atlas of natural disaster risk of China. China: Science Press.Google Scholar
  44. Shieh, S., & Deng, G. (2011). An emerging civil society: The impact of the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake on grass-roots associations in China. The China Journal, 65, 181–194.Google Scholar
  45. Sichuan Provincial Government. (2011). The 12th five-year urbanization plan of Sichuan Province. Accessed 14 Oct 2013.
  46. The State Council of P.R.C (2007). Regulations to strengthen disaster risk management of local governments. Accessed 14 Oct 2013.
  47. The State Council of P.R.C. (2008a). Support for reconstruction of post-disaster areas of Wenchuan Earthquake. Accessed 14 Oct 2013.
  48. The State Council of P.R.C. (2008b). Reconstruction plan of Wenchuan Earthquake. Accessed 14 Oct 2013.
  49. The State Council of P.R.C. (2013a). Support for reconstruction of post-disaster areas of Lushan Earthquake. Accessed 14 Oct 2013.
  50. The State Council of P.R.C. (2013b). Reconstruction plan of Lushan Earthquake. Accessed 14 Oct 2013.
  51. Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tompkins, E. L., Lemos, M. C., & Boyd, E. (2008). A less disastrous disaster: Managing response to climate-driven hazards in the Cayman Islands and NE Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 736–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (2004). Terminology: Basic terms of disaster risk reduction. Accessed 14 Nov 2013.
  54. Vatsa, S. K. (2004). Risk, vulnerability, and asset-based approach to disaster risk management. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 24(10), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wamsler, C. (2006). Mainstreaming risk reduction in urban planning and housing: A challenge for international aid organisations. Disasters, 30(2), 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Waugh, W.L., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 66, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. World Bank. (2013a). World development report 2014: Risk and opportunity managing risk for development. Accessed 21 Nov 2013.
  58. World Bank. (2013b). Building resilience: Integrating climate and disaster risk into development. Accessed 21 Nov 2013.
  59. World Bank. (2013c). Strong, safe, and resilient: A strategic policy guide for disaster risk management in East Asia and the Pacific. Accessed 21 Nov 2013.
  60. Ya’an Statistics Bureau. (2013). The Ya’an statistics year book 2013. Bureau of Statistics of Ya’an, Ya’an.Google Scholar
  61. Yao, L. (2009). Township reform trend: Analysis from perspective of fiscal and administrative power. Agricultural Economics, 2, 8–13.Google Scholar
  62. Yao, H., & Xu, Z. (2013). Report on economic development in western region of China 2013. China: China Renmin University Press Co., LTD.Google Scholar
  63. Zhang, H. (2010). Emergency management evaluation. China: China Human Resource & Social Security Publishing Group Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
  64. Zhang, Q. (2014). Disaster governance and rising power: A historical review of China’s disaster risk management from 1949. School of Public Policy and Social Development, Beijing Normal University working paper 2014–01.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Development and Public PolicyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations