Skip to main content

A Comparison of Creativity in Project Groups in Science and Engineering Education in Denmark and China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking

Part of the book series: Creativity in the Twenty First Century ((CTFC))

Abstract

Different pedagogical strategies influence the development of creativity in project groups in science and engineering education . This study is a comparison between two cases: Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Denmark and Project-Organized Learning (POL) in China. The empirical resources are based on the results from a Master’s study that was carried out with respect to POL in China (2004–2007) and a Ph.D. study that was conducted with respect to PBL in Denmark (2008–2012). The results suggest: (1) there are many diverse influencing elements in learning environments of creativity in both PBL in Denmark and POL in China, and there are interactions between the different elements that underpin a systematic view of the influences of project contexts on creativity; and (2) supervisors in China and Denmark have different attitudes towards the development of creativity in students, which reveals the differences in the learning cultures and the implications for improvements in the fostering of creativity through project strategies in engineering and science education for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie, C. (2002). Enhancing creativity in engineering students. Engineering Science and Educational Journal, 11, 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blicblau, A. S., & Steiner, J. M. (1998). Fostering creativity through engineering projects. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørner, T., Kofoed, L. B., & Bruun-Pedersen, J. R. (2012). Creativity in project work-students’ perceptions and barriers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 545–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charyton, C., & Merrill, J. (2009). Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the education. British Journal of Education Studies, 51, 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools. Routledge, London: Tensions and Dilemmas.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Collier and kappa delta phi, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eteläpelto, A., & Lahti, J. (2008). The resources and obstacles of creative collaboration in a long-term learning community. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 226–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goncalo, J. A., & Staw, B. M. (2006). Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 100, 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 5, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N., & Sinclair, C. (2006). Developing students’ creativity, searching for an appropriate pedagogy. In N. Jackson, M. Oliver, M. Shaw, & J. Wisdom (Eds.), Developing creativity in higher education. London: An Imaginative Curriculum, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2010). The universalization of creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 1–13). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H. (2007). Exploring the interactions between Asian culture (Confucianism) and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 28–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, P. M., & Kind, V. (2003). Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges for developing school science. Studies in Science Education, 43, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. S. (2011). Fostering creativity through education-a conceptual framework of creative pedagogy. Creative Education, 2, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., & Schönwetter, D. J. (2004). Teaching creativity in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20, 801–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinsons, M. G., & Martinsons, A. B. (1996). Conquering cultural constraints to cultivate Chinese management creativity and innovation. Journal of Management Development., 15, 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A. K. (2001). Why Asians are less creative than Westerners. Singapore: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A. K. (2003). A cultural model of creative and conforming behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogot, M., & Okudan, G. E. (2006). Systematic creativity methods in engineering education: A learning styles perspective. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22, 566–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults and commitment. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (18th ed., pp. 287–365). Stamford: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. E. (2002). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. The Technology Teacher, December/January 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Drummond, S. M., Albarrán, C. D., & Littleton, K. S. (2008). Collaboration, creativity and the co-construction of oral and written texts. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudowicz, E., & Yue, X. D. (2002). Compatibility of Chinese and creative personalities. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 387–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Educating engineers-designing for the future of the field. US: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, J. P. (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, J., & Mitra, A. (2009). Chinese cultural influences on knowledge management practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. J., Ye, Y. Z., & Zheng, Y. Y. (2000). Development of scales of influencing factors from personality characteristics, family environment and educational environment on creativity. Taiwan: Community of Science in Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C., Luo, L., Du, X., & Kolmos, A. (2010). Factors influencing group creativity in project-organized teams in engineering education in China. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26, 1524–1535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C. (2007). A study on core competency of science and technology groups in universities in Liaoning Province in China. Master Thesis. Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C. (2012). Group creativity development in engineering education in problem and project-based learning (PBL) environment. Ph.D. Thesis. Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunfang Zhou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhou, C., Valero, P. (2016). A Comparison of Creativity in Project Groups in Science and Engineering Education in Denmark and China. In: Corazza, G., Agnoli, S. (eds) Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-618-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-618-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-617-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-618-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics