Advertisement

Distributing Creativity: Three Thought Experiments

Chapter
Part of the Creativity in the Twenty First Century book series (CTFC)

Abstract

This chapter advances a distributed conception of creativity which challenges ‘centric’ models of this phenomenon specific for much of the psychological literature as well as lay thinking. According to this sociocultural perspective, creative action is distributed within interactions between people and between people and objects, interactions that unfold in time. A relational and developmental account is thus put forward starting from three central premises: (a) The interdependence between self and other in creative action ; (b) The fact that creativity is not a ‘thing’ but a relationship; and (c) People and culture should be understood as becoming rather than being. The present chapter proposes three thought experiment s—the deserted island, the creativity oracle, and the ‘preservation law’—best described as hypothetical situations meant to problematise implicit assumptions about creativity and support the three lines of distribution (social, material, and social) discussed here. In the end, conclusions are drawn regarding the theoretical and practical implications of ‘distributing creativity’.

Keywords

Centric Model Creative Process Creative Expression Creative Idea Creative Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amabile, T. (1990). Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In M. Runco & R. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (Sage focus editions, vol. 115 pp. 61–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Barron, F., & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, H. S. (2008). Art worlds. Updated and expended. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boden, M. (1994). What is creativity? In M. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 75–117). London: MIT Press/Badford Books.Google Scholar
  7. Conklin, J. (2005). Wicked problems and social complexity: Dialogue mapping—Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Creativity and genius: A systems perspective. In A. Steptoe (Ed.), Genius and the mind: Studies of creativity and temperament (pp. 39–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Eco, U. (1989). The open work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Farr, R. (1996). The roots of modern social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Principles for a cultural psychology of creativity. Culture and Psychology, 16(2), 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glăveanu, V. P. (2012a). From dichotomous to relational thinking in the psychology of creativity: A review of great debates. Creativity and Leisure: An Intercultural and Cross-disciplinary Journal, 1(2), 83–96.Google Scholar
  18. Glăveanu, V. P. (2012b). Habitual creativity: Revisiting habit, reconceptualising creativity. Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glăveanu, V. P. (2014a). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glăveanu, V. P. (2014b). Thinking through creativity and culture: Toward an integrated model. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Glăveanu, V. P., Gillespie, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2014). Rethinking creativity: Contributions from cultural psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Glăveanu, V. P., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, M., de Biaisi, P. -M., & Desainte-Catherine, M. (2013). Creativity as action: Findings from five creative domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, article 176.Google Scholar
  23. Gruber, H. (2005). The creative person as a whole: The evolving systems approach to the study of creative work. In E. Gruber & K. Bödeker (Eds.), Creativity, psychology and the history of science (pp. 35–104). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hennessey, B. A. (2003). Is the social psychology of creativity really social? Moving beyond a focus on the individual. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 181–201). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hermans, H. J. M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind. Theory and Psychology, 12(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hutchins, E. (2000). Distributed cognition. IESBS Distributed Cognition. Retrieved on August 26, 2014 from http://files.meetup.com/410989/DistributedCognition.pdf.
  29. John-Steiner, V. (1992). Creative lives, creative tensions. Creativity Research Journal, 5(1), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kasof, J. (1999). Attribution and creativity. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. I, pp. 147–156). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lubart, T. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité [The psychology of creativity]. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  33. Mason, J. H. (2003). The value of creativity: an essay on intellectual history, from Genesis to Nietzsche. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  34. McNeil, M. C., Polloway, E. A., & Smith, J. D. (1984). Feral and isolated children: Historical review and analysis. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 19(1), 70–79.Google Scholar
  35. Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In R. K. Sawyer, et al. (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 61–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Negus, K., & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, communication and cultural value. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Paulus, P., & Nijstad, B. (Eds.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Plato (1987). The Republic (2nd ed., Desmond Lee, Trans.). New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  40. Plucker, J., & Renzulli, J. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–311.Google Scholar
  42. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 173–220). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. Potts, J. D., Hartley, J., Banks, J. A., Burgess, J. E., Cobcroft, R. S., Cunningham, S. D., & Montgomery, L. (2008). Consumer co-creation and situated creativity. Industry and Innovation, 15(5), 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rowlands, M. (2010). The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Runco, M. (1999). Creativity need not be social. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity (Vol. I, pp. 237–264). Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shweder, R. (1990). Cultural psychology—What is it? In J. Stigler, R. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Historiometry. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. I, pp. 815–822). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1999). Insight. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 57–70). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  51. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Vygotsky, L. S. (1991). Imagination and creativity in the adolescent. Soviet Psychology, 29(1), 73–88.Google Scholar
  53. Ward, T., Smith, S., & Finke, R. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 182–212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Willis, P. (1990). Common culture: Symbolic work at play in the everyday cultures of the young. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Wundt, E. (1927). Wilhelm Wundts Werke. Ein Verzeichnis seiner sämtlichen Schriften [Wilhelm Wundt’s Works: An index of all his writings]. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations