Advertisement

Creative Processes: Art, Design and Science

Chapter
Part of the Creativity in the Twenty First Century book series (CTFC)

Abstract

Since Wallas (1926), the description of the stages of the creative process concerned creativity in general, including art, science, design or music. But what about differences in the creative process between different fields of endeavor? The objectives of this chapter are to describe creative processes respecting an ecological approach by observing the process in its natural context. Analyses of the transitions between process stages, by domain and across domains, show specific patterns underlying creative work. In this chapter, a new vision of the creative process across fields is offered. Issues of process-related domain specificity are discussed.

Keywords

Creative process Observations Ecological validity Art Design Engineering 

References

  1. Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Busse, T. V., & Mansfield, R. S. (1980). Theories of the creative process: A review and a perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14(2), 91–103. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1980.tb00232.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gero, J. S. (2004). The situated function behavior structure framework. Design Studies, 25(4), 373–391. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glaveanu, V., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, M., De Biasi, P.-M., De Sainte Catherine, M., et al. (2013). Creativity as action: Findings from five creative domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00176.
  7. Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29, 160–180. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mace, M.-A., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the creative process: A grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 179–192. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Miller, A. L. (2009). Cognitive processes associated with creativity: Scale development and validation. Doctoral Thesis. Ball State University.Google Scholar
  11. Nemiro, J. E. (2002). The creative process in virtual teams. Communication Research Journal, 14(1), 69–83. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_6.Google Scholar
  12. Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination (3rd ed.). New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
  13. Shaw, M. P. (1989). The eureka process: A structure for the creative experience in science and engineering. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 286–298. doi: 10.1080/10400418909534325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shaw, M. P. (1994). Affective components of scientific creativity. In M. P. Shaw & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Creativity and affect (pp. 3–43). Westport: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Treffinger, D. J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 301–312. doi: 10.1007/BF02213375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Adaptation, Travail et Individu—LATIUniversité Paris DescartesBoulogne Billancourt CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations