The Defragmentation of Creativity: Future Directions with an Emphasis on Educational Applications
- 2.2k Downloads
In recent years, there has been a virtual explosion in the creativity literature of topics, perspectives and methodologies; yet investigators in one subfield often seem entirely unaware of advances in another. The field of creativity research has become increasingly fragmented, but how should defragmentation proceed, if at all? Should researchers attempt to construct a unified systems theory of creativity ? The argument is made that a defragmentation of the creativity field should not entail wholesale reduction to models that fail to help us understand reality and generate new hypotheses. Some models may be hazardous because they distort reality either by oversimplification or, in an opposite vein, by complicating our understanding through attempts to include all aspects and instances of the process of creativity across all cultures into one unified model or by losing sight of the applied goals of our research. Specific models of creativity and specific issues related to enhancing creativity in our schools are presented as part of this discussion.
KeywordsCreativity Research Design Thinking Creative Intersection Cultural Participation Creativity Literature
- Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Baer, J. (2011). Why grand theories of creativity distort, distract and disappoint. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 21(1), 73–100.Google Scholar
- Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.Google Scholar
- Christensen, C. M., Johnson, C. W., & Horn, M. B. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Christensen, C. M., Wang, D., & van Bever, D. (2013). Consulting on the cusp of disruption. Harvard Business Review, 91(6), 106–114.Google Scholar
- Hennessey, B. A. (2004). Developing creativity in gifted children: The central importance of motivation and classroom climate. NRCG/T Senior Scholar Series. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented (RM04202).Google Scholar
- Keynes, J. N. (1917). The scope and method of political economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Martin, R. L. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
- Pallotta, D. (2013). What’s the point of creativity? Retrieved from http://blogs.hbr.org/2013/09/does-your-innovation-come-from/.
- Persson, R. S. (2012). Cultural variation and dominance in a globalised knowledge-economy: Towards a culture-sensitive research paradigm in the science of giftedness. Gifted and Talented International, 27, 15–48.Google Scholar
- Robelen, E. W. (2012). Coming to schools: Creativity indexes. Education Week, 31(1), 12–13.Google Scholar
- Watanabe, T., & Villeneuve, M. (2013, August 21). Public opposes use of test scores in teacher reviews, poll shows. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from: http://articles.latimes.com/2013/aug/21/local/la-me-ln-education-poll-20130821.
- Watson, M. W. (1982). Developmental psychologists in the classroom. In T. M. Amabile & M. L. Stubbs (Eds.), Psychological research in the classroom: Issues for educators and researchers (pp. 63–75). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar