Skip to main content

On the Path Towards the Science of Creative Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking

Part of the book series: Creativity in the Twenty First Century ((CTFC))

Abstract

In this introductory Chapter, we state the fundamental elements that underpin the science of creative thinking, recognizing at the same time that we are following a path towards the establishment of that science, and that many challenges are yet to be met. Considering theoretical models for the creative thinking process, we discuss the minimum number of stages, the concept of optimal originality, and we review the most important existing models, outlining their features and limitations. The discussion then moves from the individual to the social level. After reviewing the generally accepted approaches in social creativity analysis, we call for balanced fusion of the individual and social points of view, avoiding artificial contrasts. Two macro domains are then analysed: engineering and design and art. In the former, we introduce the concepts of creative reproduction of nature, extension of capabilities and of conditions for life, and we discuss the use of metaphors in various forms. For the latter, we start with a scientific definition of inspiration, then move on to discuss the delicate balance between discipline and spontaneity in artistic education. Also, we touch upon the state-of-the-art of artificial creators that can produce mimicking the style of great artists. We conclude the Chapter by addressing some areas which we consider to be both urgent and necessary in the development of the science of creative thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altshuller, G. (1984). Creativity as an exact science. New York: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualisation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. New York: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, personality and intelligence: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, N., & Cascini, G. (2015). Improving self-efficacy in solving inventive problems with TRIZ. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botella, M., & Lubart, T. (2015). Creative processes: Art, design and science. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattani, G., Colucci, M., & Ferriani, S. (2015). Chanel’s creative trajectory in the field of fashion: The optimal network structuration strategy. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E., & Agnoli, S. (2013). DIMAI: An universal model for creative thinking. Report: Marconi Institute for Creativity Internal, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H. (2015). Creativity in engineering. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1011–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 822–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorniak-Wall, K. (2015). A Review of integrated approaches to the study of creativity: A proposal for a systems framework for creativity. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Mechanisms of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of the impact of personality on scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 2, 290–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1962). Creative writers and daydreaming. In Strachy, J. (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 142–152). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1908).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghedini, F., Pachet, F., & Roy, P. (2015). Creating music and texts with flow machines. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Distributing creativity: Three thought experiments. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, M. K., Farzaneh, H. H., & Lindemann, U. (2015). Creating bio-inspired solution ideas using biological research articles. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A., & Watson, M. W. (2015). The defragmentation of creativity: Future directions with an emphasis on educational applications. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivcevic, Z., Bracket, M. A., & Mayer, J. D. (2007). Emotional intelligence and emotional creativity. Journal of Personality, 75, 199–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journeaux, J., & Mottram, J. (2015). Creativity and art education: Gaps between theories and practices. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. B., Butt, A. E., Kaufman, J. C., & Colbert-White, E. N. (2011). Towards a neurobiology of creativity in nonhuman animals. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125, 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, C., Lubart, T., & Houssemand, C. (2015). Creativity in student architects: Multivariate approach. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kounios, J., Frymiare, J. L., Bowden, E. M., Fleck, J. I., Subramaniam, K., Parrish, T. B., & Jung-Beeman, M. J. (2006). The prepared mind: Neural activity prior to problem presentation predicts sub-sequent solution by sudden insight. Psychological Science, 17, 882–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poincarè, H. (1952). Science and method (Francis Maitland, Trans.). London: Dover. (Original work published 1914).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, S., & Bhattacharya, J. (2015). Neurocognitive aspects of musical improvisation and performance. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2014). Journal of Genius and Eminence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Pritzker, S. (2011). Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Ruiz, M. J., Hernandez-Torrano, D., Perez-Gonzales, J. C., Batey, M., & Petrides, K. V. (2011). The relationship between trait emotional intelligence and creativity across subject domains. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 461–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2006). Explaining creativity. The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sgourev, S. V. (2015). Dangerous liaisons: Bridging micro and macro levels in creativity research. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. (2008). Discernment and creativity: How well can people identify their most creative ideas. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2012). Quantifying creativity: Can measures span the spectrum? Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14, 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K., & Ting, S. S. (2010). Creativity in eastern and western civilizations: The lessons of historiometry. Management and Organization Review, 6, 329–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sintoni, C. (2015). Music listening, composition and performance: An experience of creativity for education. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research, 18, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). On short-selling the investment theory of creativity: A reply to Runco. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 200–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Thienen, J., & Meinel, C. (2015). Tele-board MED: Supporting creative problem solving in behaviour psychotherapy. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, W. P. (2015). Creativity and a human dichotomy: Individual or part of a team? In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C., & Valero, P. (2015). A comparison of creativity in project groups in science and engineering education in Denmark and China. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Emanuele Corazza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Corazza, G.E., Agnoli, S. (2016). On the Path Towards the Science of Creative Thinking. In: Corazza, G., Agnoli, S. (eds) Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-618-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-618-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-617-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-618-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics