Advertisement

Creating Music and Texts with Flow Machines

  • Fiammetta Ghedini
  • François Pachet
  • Pierre Roy
Chapter
Part of the Creativity in the Twenty First Century book series (CTFC)

Abstract

This chapter introduces the vision and the technical challenges of the Flow Machines project. Flow Machines aim at fostering creativity in artistic domains such as music and literature. We first observe that typically, great artists do not output just single artefacts but develop novel, individual styles. Style mirrors an individual’s uniqueness; style makes an artist’s work recognised and recognisable. Artists develop their own style after prolonged periods of imitation and exploration of the style of others. We envision style exploration as the application of existing styles, considered as texture, to arbitrary constraints, considered as structure. The goal of Flow Machines is to assist this process by allowing users to explicitly manipulate styles as computational objects. During interactions with Flow Machines, the user can create artefacts (melodies, texts, orchestrations) by combining styles with arbitrary constraints. Style exploration under user-defined constraints raises complex sequence generation issues that were addressed and solved for the most part during the first half of the project. We illustrate the potential of these techniques for style exploration with three examples.

Keywords

Divergent Thinking Psychological Trait Style Exploration Creative Individual Scientific Creativity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is conducted within the Flow Machines project, which received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement n. 291156.

References

  1. Ackerman, P. L. (2007). New developments in understanding skilled performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5).Google Scholar
  2. Adaman, J., & Blaney, P. (1995). The effects of musical mood induction on creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(2), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, J. L. (1986). Conceptual blockbusting, a guide to better ideas. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Alexakis, A., Khatchatourov, A., Triantafyllaki, A., & Anagnostopoulou, C. (2013). Measuring musical creativity advancement. In Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference (SMAC) and Sound and Music Computing Conference (SMC), July 30–Aug 3, 2013, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  5. Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013.Google Scholar
  6. Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1999). The history of creativity research. In R. S. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baas, M., De Dreuk, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 34(6), 779–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbieri, G., Pachet, F., Roy, P., & Degli Esposti, M. (2012). Markov constraints for generating lyrics with style. In Luc De Raedt et al. (Ed.), ECAI (pp. 115–120).Google Scholar
  9. Barron, F., & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.Google Scholar
  10. Bartezzaghi, S. (2013). ll falò delle novità (The bonfire of the novelties), UTET.Google Scholar
  11. Becker, M. (1995). Nineteenth-century foundations of creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 219–229.Google Scholar
  12. Berlyne, D. E., & Ogilvie, J. C. (1974). Dimensions of perception of paintings. In E. Berlyne (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps towards an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  13. Boden, M. (1990). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Weidenfield and Nicholson.Google Scholar
  14. Boden, M. (1999). Computer models of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The handbook of creativity (pp. 351–372). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Burke, J. (1995). Connections. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  16. Boring, E. G. (1971). Dual role of the Zeitgeist in scientific creativity. In V. S. Sexton, & H. K. Misiak (Eds.), Historical perspectives in psychology: Readings. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole (Originally published in 1955).Google Scholar
  17. Bruininks, R. H., & Feldman, D. H. (1970). Creativity, intelligence and achievement among disadvantaged children. Psychology in the Schools.Google Scholar
  18. Campbell, M. R. (1991). Musical learning and the development of psychological processes in perception and cognition. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 107, 35–48.Google Scholar
  19. Castro, L., Perez, R., Santos, A., & Carballal, A. (2014). Authorship and aesthetics experiments. Comparison of results between human and computational systems. In Proceedings of Evostar.Google Scholar
  20. Carlier, M. (1973). Differential study of one modality of creativity: Flexibility. Monographies Françaises de Psychologie, 25, 105.Google Scholar
  21. Colton, S., & Wiggins, G. A. (2012). Computational creativity: The final frontier? In ECAI.Google Scholar
  22. Cravens, A., et al. (2014). Reflecting, iterating, and tolerating ambiguity: Highlighting the creative process of scientific and scholarly research for doctoral education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 229–247.Google Scholar
  23. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1965). Artistic problems and their solutions: An exploration of creativity in the arts. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago (quoted in Sawyer, K. (2006) Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  24. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Conti, R., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation/drive. In M. A. Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cox, C. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius. The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Dailey, A., Martindale, C., & Borkum, J. (1997). Creativity, synesthesia, and physiognomic perception. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  28. Dudek, S. Z., Strobel, M., Runco, M. A. (1994). Cumulative and proximal influences of the social environment on creative potential. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154, 487–499.Google Scholar
  29. Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822.Google Scholar
  30. Duff, W. (1767/1964). An essay on original genius and its various modes of exertion in philosophy and the fine arts, particularly in poetry. In J. A. Harris (Ed.), Quoted in the Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the eighteenth century (2013).Google Scholar
  31. Eisenberg, J. (2002). Does individual motivation and creativity predict group creative performance? Yes, but with some surprises. In Proceedings of the International WAM Meeting, Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
  32. Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Feldman, H. D. (1994). Beyond universals in cognitive development. NJ, Albex: Norwood.Google Scholar
  34. Feinstein, J. S. (2006). Creative interests and conceptions of creative interests. In The nature of creativity. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Perseus Book Group.Google Scholar
  36. Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613–617.Google Scholar
  37. Gabora, L., O’Connor, B., & Ranjan, A. (2012). The recognizability of individual creative styles within and across domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 351.Google Scholar
  38. Gardner, H. (1970). Children’s sensitivity to painting styles. Child Development, 41, 813–821.Google Scholar
  39. Glazer, E. (2009). Rephrasing the madness and creativity debate: What is the nature of the creativity construct? Personality and Individual Differences, 46(8), 755–764.Google Scholar
  40. Gombrich, H. (1960). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. New York (Originally delivered in 1956 as the A.W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts at the National Gallery of Art, Washington).Google Scholar
  41. Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Motivated creativity: motivational synergy of the youth’s creative attitude. Chowanna, 1(36) (English edition), 27–41.Google Scholar
  42. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence.Google Scholar
  43. Guilford, J. P. (1979). Some incubated thoughts on incubation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 13, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hedges, T., Roy, P., & Pachet, F. (2014). Predicting the composer and style of Jazz Chord progressions. Journal of New Music Research, 43(3), 276–290.Google Scholar
  45. Hofstadter, D. (1985). Metamagical themas: Questing for the essence of mind and patterns. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  46. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122.Google Scholar
  48. James, W. (1880). Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 46, 441–459.Google Scholar
  49. Jones, B. F., & Weinberg, B. A. (2011). Age dynamics in scientific creativity. PNAS, 108(47), 18910–18914.Google Scholar
  50. Kaufmann, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (2002). The effects of mood on early and late idea production. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4).Google Scholar
  51. Keefe, J. A., & Magaro, P. (1980). Creativity and schizophrenia: An equivalence of cognitive processing. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89(3), 390.Google Scholar
  52. Kohanyi, A. (2009). Mood variability and mood regulation in student journalists and creative writers. In S. B. Kaufman & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The psychology of creative writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Lubart, T., & Georgsdottir, A. (2004). Creativity: Developmental and cross-cultural issues. In S. Lau, A. N. Hui, & G. Y. Ng (Eds.), Creativity: When East meets West. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  55. Lubart, T., & Sternberg, R. (1995). An Investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité [Psychology of creativity). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  57. Marshall, N. A., & Shibazaki, K. (2011). Instrument, gender and musical style associations in young children. Psychology of Music, 40(4), 0305735611408996.Google Scholar
  58. Martin, L., Ward, D., Achee, J., & Wyer, R. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 317Google Scholar
  59. Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  60. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370.Google Scholar
  61. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. (2002). Contemporary studies on the concept of creativity: the east and the west. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(4), 269–288.Google Scholar
  63. Pachet, F., & Roy, P. (2011). Markov constraints: Steerable generation of Markov sequences. Constraints, 16(2), 148–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pachet, F. (2012). Musical virtuosity and creativity. In J. McCormack, & M. d’Inverno (Ed.), Computers and creativity. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  65. Pachet, F., Suzda, J., & Martin, D. (2013). A comprehensive online database of machine-readable lead sheets for jazz standards. In ISMIR (pp. 275–280), Curitiba (Brazil).Google Scholar
  66. Pachet, F., & Roy, P. (2014). Generation of stylistically imitative leadsheets with user constraints. In Proceedings of the 22th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
  67. Pachet, F., & Roy, P. (2014). Non-conformant harmonization: The real book in the style of take 6. In Proceedings of ICCC 2014 (International Conference on Computational Creativity), Ljubljiana.Google Scholar
  68. Papadopoulos, A., Roy, P., & Pachet, F. (2014). Avoiding plagiarism in Markov sequence generation. In Proceedings of the AAAI.Google Scholar
  69. Raidl, M., & Lubart, T. (2001). An empirical study of intuition and creativity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 20(3), 217–230.Google Scholar
  70. Rothenberg, A. (1996). The Janusian process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Roy, P., & Pachet, F. (2013). Enforcing meter in finite-length Markov sequences. In Proceedings of AAAI.   Google Scholar
  72. Rossman, J. (1931). The psychology of the inventor. Washington: Inventors Publishing Company.   Google Scholar
  73. Rubinstein, G., (2008) Are schizophrenic patients necessarily creative? A comparative study between three groups of psychiatric inpatients. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 806–810.Google Scholar
  74. Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1986). The threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and nongifted children. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11(4), 212–218.Google Scholar
  75. Runco, M. A., & Basadur, M. S. (1993). Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2(3), 285–289.Google Scholar
  76. Runco, M. A., & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.). (1999). Encyclopedia of creativity. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  77. Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  79. Schlesinger, J. (2014). 4 building connections on sand: The cautionary chapter. Creativity and Mental Illness, 60.Google Scholar
  80. Schuldberg, D. (2001). Six subclinical spectrum traits in normal creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries (pp. 1613–15). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin Copyright 1988 by the American Psychological Association, 104(2), 251.Google Scholar
  83. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Singer, J. K. (2010). Creativity in confinement, In D. H. Cropley, A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaufman, & M. A. Runco (Eds.), The dark side of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Sternberg, R., & Grigorenko, E. (2001). Guilford’s structure of intellect model and model of creativity: contributions and limitations. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sternberg, R., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1995). The nature of insight. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
  87. Stohs, J. H. (1992). Intrinsic motivation and sustained art activity among male fine and applied artists. Creativity Research Journal 5(3), 245–252.Google Scholar
  88. Sulloway, F. (1996). Born to Rebel. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  89. Tegano, D. W. (1990). Relationship of tolerance of ambiguity and playfulness to creativity. Psychological Report, 66, 1047–1056.Google Scholar
  90. Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(4), 195–199.Google Scholar
  91. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Directions guide and scoring manual. Massachusetts: Personal Press.Google Scholar
  92. Voss, R. F., & Clarke, J. (1975). ‘1/f noise’ in music and speech. Nature, 258, 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  94. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.Google Scholar
  95. Wiggins, G. A. (2006). Searching for computational Creativity. New Generation Computing (Springer), 24(3), 209–222.Google Scholar
  96. Zenasni, F., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 61–73.Google Scholar
  97. Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. (2011). Pleasantness of creative tasks and creative performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 49–56.Google Scholar
  98. Horn, J. F. (2014). Creative confluence, linguistic approaches to literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fiammetta Ghedini
    • 1
  • François Pachet
    • 1
  • Pierre Roy
    • 1
  1. 1.Sony Computer Science LaboratoryParisFrance

Personalised recommendations