Creativity in Student Architects: Multivariate Approach

Part of the Creativity in the Twenty First Century book series (CTFC)


This chapter proposes an integrative model for creativity in student architects. It is inspired by several theoretical conceptions and adapted to the present population. The established model is an initial attempt to build a genuine latent model for the prediction of creativity. This approach can be adapted to different domains of creative achievement: artistic, scientific and everyday life.


Latent Inhibition Positive Predictor Standardize Root Mean Square Residual Fluid Intelligence Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. AlleyDog. (1998–2015). Intelligence. In psychology glossary. Retrieved from
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barron, F. (1953). Some personality correlates of independence of judgment. Journal of Personality, 21(3), 287–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1953.tb01772.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barron, F. (1963). Integration, diffusion, and enduring attention as aspects of the creative process. In R. W. White (Ed.), The study of lives: Essays on personality in honor of Henry A. Murray (pp. 234–248). New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
  5. Barron, F. (1965). The psychology of creativity. In T. Newcomb (Ed.), New directions in psychology II (pp. 3–134). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  7. Barron, F. (1972). Artists in the making. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barron, F. (1995). No rootless flower: An ecology of creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
  9. Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429. doi: 10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 480–485. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.014 Google Scholar
  11. Bonnardel, R. (1971). Batterie factorielle standard [Standard factor battery]. Issy-les-Moulineaux, France: Editions Scientifiques et Psychologiques.Google Scholar
  12. Brod, J. H. (1997). Schizotypy: Implications for illness and health. In G. Claridge (Ed.), Creativity and schizotypy (pp. 274–298). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, A. D., Kornberger, M., Clegg, S. R., & Carter, C. (2010). ‘Invisible walls’ and ‘silent hierarchies’: A case study of power relations in an architecture firm. Human Relations, 63(4), 525–549. doi: 10.1177/0018726709339862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caroff, X., & Besançon, M. (2008). Variability of creativity judgments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 367–371. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R: Revised NEO personality inventory and NEO-FFI: NEO five-factor inventory [Professional manual]. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  17. DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33(4), 533–552. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy Dollinger, S. M. (1997). Individuality and identity exploration: An autophotographic study. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(3), 337–354. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dollinger, S. J., Leong, F. T. L., & Ulcini, S. K. (1996a). On traits and values: With special reference to openness to experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 23–41. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1996.0002.Google Scholar
  21. Dollinger, S. J., Preston, L. A., O’Brien, S. P., & DiLalla, D. L. (1996b). Individuality and relatedness of the self: An autophotographic study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1268–1278. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1268.Google Scholar
  22. Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1601_4.Google Scholar
  23. Dudek, S. Z., & Hall, W. B. (1991). Personality consistency: Eminent architects 25 years later. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 213–231. doi: 10.1080/10400419109534395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–178. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0403_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Psychologi-cal Review, 2(4), 290–309. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5.Google Scholar
  27. Gardner, M. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Novelty and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Mind in context (pp. 38–71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gough, H. G. (1975). A new scientific uses test and its relationship to creativity in research. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 9, 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (1996). The neuropsychology of anxiety: Reprise. In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Perspectives on anxiety, panic, and fear (pp. 61–134). Lincoln, USA: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gregory, R. L. (1981). Mind in science. Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  31. Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51. doi: 10.1080/10400418809534285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hall, W. B., & MacKinnon, D. W. (1969). Personality inventory correlates of creativity among architects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 322–326. doi: 10.1037/h0027811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1996). MMPI-2 : Inventaire multiphasique de personnalité du Minnesota-2 [Questionnaire et manuel]. [Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 (Questionnaire and manual)]. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar
  34. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (2000). MMPI-2: Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 [Questionnaire and manual]. (R. Engel (Ed.) Trans.). Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  35. Helson, R. (1999). Longitudinal study of creative personality in women. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 89–102. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1202_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Reality, intrinsic motivation, and creativity. American Psychologist, 53(6), 674–675. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.6.674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jamison, K. R. (1989). Mood disorders and patterns of creativity in British writers and artists. Psychiatry, 52, 125–134.Google Scholar
  38. Johnson, J. A. (1994). Clarification of factor five with the help of the AB5C model. European Journal of Personality, 8, 311–334. doi: 10.1002/per.2410080408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karlins, M., Schuerhoff, C., & Kaplan, M. (1969). Some factors related to architectural creativity in graduating architecture students. The Journal of General Psychology, 81, 203–215. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1969.9711286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaufmann, G. (2004). Two kinds of creativity—but which ones? Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(3), 154–165. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00305.x.Google Scholar
  41. Kaufman, J. C., Lee, J., Baer, J., & Lee, S. (2007). Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique. New evidence of validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 96–106. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2007.04.002.Google Scholar
  42. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  44. Lubart, T. (1999). Componential models. In S. Pritzker & M. Runco (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 295–300). San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité [Psychology of creativity]. Paris : Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  46. Lubart, T., Pacteau, C., Jacquet, A.-Y., & Caroff, X. (2010). Children’s creative potential: An empirical study of measurement issues. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 388–392. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.006.Google Scholar
  47. MacKinnon, D. W. (1960). Genius architectus creator varietas Americanus. Journal of the American Institute of Architects, 1, 31–35.Google Scholar
  48. MacKinnon, D. W. (1961). Creativity in architects. In D. W. MacKinnon (Ed.), The creative person (pp. 291–320). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Personality Assessment and Research, University of California.Google Scholar
  49. MacKinnon, D. W. (1962a). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484–495. doi: 10.1037/h0046541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MacKinnon, D. W. (1962b). The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. In G. S. Nielsen (Ed.), Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Applied Psychology, Copenhagen 1961 (Vol. 2, pp. 11–39). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  51. MacKinnon, D. W. (1963). Creativity and images of the self. In R. W. White (Ed.), The study of lives (pp. 250–278). New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
  52. MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273–281. doi: 10.1037/h0022403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. MacKinnon, D. W. (1969). The courage to be: Realizing creative potential. ASCD Yearbook, 1969(69), 95–110.Google Scholar
  54. MacKinnon, D. W. (1970). Creativity: A multi-faceted phenomenon. In J. Roslansky (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 19–32). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  55. MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness. Buffalo, NY: Bearly.Google Scholar
  56. May, R. (1975). The courage to create. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  57. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–1265. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Openness to experience. In R. Hogan & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives in personality (Vol. 1, pp. 145–172). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  59. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2007). Mplus User’s Guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  61. Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 220–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ostendorf, F., & Angleiter, A. (1994). Enthusiasts contra pessimists. Psychological Inquiry, 5(2), 159–162.Google Scholar
  64. Peterson, J. B. (1999). Maps of meaning: The architecture of belief. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Peterson, J. B., & Carson, S. (2000). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 323–332. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00101-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Dif-ferences, 33, 1137–1147. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00004-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Piirto, J. (1992). Understanding those who create. Tempe, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  68. Rank, O. (1945). Will therapy and truth and reality (J. Traft, Trans.). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  69. Runco, M. A. (1989). Parents’ and teachers’ ratings of the creativity of children. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 73–83.Google Scholar
  70. Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevir Academic Press.Google Scholar
  71. Runco, M. A., Johnson, D., & Baer, P. (1993). Parents ‘and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91–113.Google Scholar
  72. Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40(4), 343–351. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.005.Google Scholar
  73. Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  74. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond lQ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(4), 571–590. doi: 10.1080/14640748508400920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Urban, K. K. (1990). Recent trends in creativity research and theory in Western Europe. European Journal for High Ability, 1, 99–113. doi: 10.1080/0937445900010014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Urban, K. K. (1995). Different models in describing, exploring, explaining and nurturing creativity in society. European Journal for High Ability, 6, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Urban, K. K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The test of creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal, 6(2), 272–280.Google Scholar
  79. Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1996). TCT-DP: Test for creative thinking-drawing production. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  80. Welsh, G. S. (1959). Welsh figure preference test: Preliminary manual. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LuxembourgWalferdangeLuxembourg
  2. 2.Université Paris DescartesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations