Advertisement

Open-Source Pathways to Educational Development

  • Joel D. Moore

Abstract

This chapter will explore the challenges and opportunities associated with the use of open-source software solutions to particular pedagogical challenges. I explore the implementation of various open-source platforms to facilitate the achievement of learning outcomes. Specifically, I will look at the use of open-source software to facilitate peer-assisted and problem-based learning. Readers will gain an appreciation for the potential educational value of these important new open-source resources. Subtopics will include: open-source educational technologies, peer-assisted learning, problem-based learning, and flexible ICT policies for continued innovation.

Flexible ICT policies with sufficient internal quality control will allow individual departments and members of staff to identify open-source technologies that meet their pedagogical needs. Such policies can, with minimal cost, reduce the amount of time required to achieve desired learning outcomes and free academics to contribute to knowledge creation through research.

Keywords

Learn Management System Undergraduate Research Individual Professor Victory Condition Social Networking Software 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Asal, V., & Kratoville, J. (2013). Constructing international relations simulations: Examining the pedagogy of IR simulations through a constructivist learning theory lens. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(2), 132–143. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2013.770982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asal, V., Kollars, N. A., Raymond, C., & Rosen, A. M. (2013). Editors’ introduction to the thematic issue: Bringing interactive simulations into the political science classroom. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(2), 129–131. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2013.770981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Autor, D. (2014). Polanyi’s paradox and the shape of employment growth (No. 20485). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  4. Cuban, L. (2012). MOOCs and pedagogy: Teacher-centered, student-centered, and hybrids. Retrieved from http://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/moocs-and-pedagogy-part-2/. Accessed 5 Dec 2014.
  5. Glazier, R. (2011). Running simulations without ruining your life: Simple ways to incorporate active learning into your teaching. Journal of Political Science Education. 37–41. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2011.615188.
  6. Hinchcliffe, D. (2014). The digital workplace 2014: Plight and promise of today’s employees. Retrieved from http://www.zdnet.com/article/the-digital-workplace-2014-plight-and-promise-of-todays-employees/. Accessed 5 Dec 2014.
  7. Jackson, S. F. (2013). Political simulations using excel. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(2), 209–221. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2013.770991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jensen, C., King, S., & Kuechler, V. (2011). Joining free/open source software communities: An analysis of newbies’ first interactions on project mailing lists. 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 1–10. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.264.Google Scholar
  9. Kishida, K. (2003). Toward an understanding of the motivation of open source software developers. 25th international conference on software engineering, 2003. Proceedings, 419–429. doi:10.1109/ICSE.2003.1201220.Google Scholar
  10. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mathews, a. L., & LaTronica-Herb, A. (2013). Using blackboard to increase student learning and assessment outcomes in a congressional simulation. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(2), 168–183. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2013.770986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Raymond, C., & Usherwood, S. (2013). Assessment in simulations. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(2), 157–167. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2013.770984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schapper, J., & Mayson, S. E. (2010). Research‐led teaching: Moving from a fractured engagement to a marriage of convenience. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 641–651. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.489236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wheeler, D. A. (2004). Why open source software/free software (oss/fs, floss, or foss)? look at the numbers! Retrieved from http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html. Accessed 5 Dec 2014.
  16. Yuan, L., Powell, S., & CETIS, J. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Cetis white paper. Retrieved from http://www.smarthighered.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Arts and Social SciencesMonash UniversitySelangorMalaysia

Personalised recommendations