Skip to main content

Web 2.0 Technologies and Indian IT Service Companies: An Impact Analysis

  • Chapter
Smart Technologies for Smart Nations

Part of the book series: Managing the Asian Century ((MAAC))

Abstract

The study focuses on Indian information technology (IT) companies and, at a first level, probes into the impact of Web 2.0 technologies on the performance and functioning of these firms. The design of web information systems requires adaptations to the new developments, if not completely new methods. This is particularly stressed by the focus of user contributions to a community or service and the incorporation of collaboration, to be extended to be fully functional as a Web 2.0 application development method. Consulting firms like McKinsey have carried out research on global companies on similar lines but not on Indian IT companies. The present study attempts to fill this gap in knowledge base. The work reported in the paper attempts to examine the adoption status among Indian IT companies and its impact on corporate performance, leveraging the various tools available. Company-based survey methodology has been adopted through validated instruments, across these performance areas: knowledge management, rapid application development, customer relationship management, collaboration and communication, innovation, and training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alvarez G (2010) Magic quadrant for e-commerce. Gartner Report, May 18. https://www.gartner.com/doc/1371615/magic-quadrant-ecommerce

  • Andriole SJ (2010) Business impact of Web 2.0 technologies. Commun ACM 53(12):67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azoff M, Blowers M, Burnett S, Davis M, Edwards R, Lavenda D, Hailstone R, Jennings T, Kellett A, Rodger A, Thomps M (2008) Enterprise Web 2.0, technology management and strategy report. Bultler/Ovum/Datamonitor, 1 September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannan KJ (2008) What to measure? B to B 93(3):13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes D, Clear F, Dyerson R, Harindranath G, Harris L, Rae A (2012) Web 2.0 and micro-businesses: an exploratory investigation. J Small Bus Enterp Develop 19(4):687–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter GJ (2014) Guest editorial: implementing Web 2.0 tools in organisations. Learn Organ 21(1):2–5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter GJ, Connolly TM (2014) Implementing Web 2.0 tools in organisations: feasibility of a systematic approach. Learn Organ 21(1):6–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell J, Loane S (2010) “New wave” global firms: Web 2.0 and SME internationalization. J Mark Manag 26(3/4):213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bughin J, Chui M (2010) The rise of the networked enterprise: Web 2.0 finds its payday. McKinsey Quarterly, McKinsey Global Institute, Seattle, USA, 10 December

    Google Scholar 

  • Bughin J, Chui M, Miller A (2009) How companies are benefiting from Web 2.0: McKinsey global survey results. McKinsey Quarterly, Mckinsey Global Institute, Seattle, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson SA (2009) A view to a killer business model. Black Enterp 40(5):50–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley JA, Jones SC, Iverson D (2012) Web 2.0: an assessment of social marketing principles. J Soc Market 2(3):207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauscette M (2010) The intersection of Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0, and collaboration: the social business. Filing Information, IDC #221413, 1, January

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliardi D (2013) Next generation entrepreneur: innovation strategy through Web 2.0 technologies in SMEs. Technol Anal Strat Manag 25(8):891–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granat P (2006) Public first: how to make Web 2.0 work for you. Pub Relat Tactics 13(11):38

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn G, Foth M, Gray H (2009) Applications and implementations of new media in corporate communications: An action research approach. Corp Commun Int J 14(1):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman DL (2009) Managing beyond Web 2.0. McKinsey quarterly report, 1 July /2009

    Google Scholar 

  • HR Software and Technology Feature 08 (2008) Top HR technology trends for 2008. Hum Resour Mag 12(6):34–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones B (2010) Entrepreneurial marketing and the Web 2.0 interface. J Res Market Entrep 12(2):143–152

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Keitt TJ, Burris P, Ashour M (2010) Business Web 2.0 buyer profile: 2010. Forrester Research Inc. Cambridge, MA, USA, 28 April 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy M (2009) Web 2.0 implications for knowledge management. J Knowl Manag 13(1):120–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox K (2008) Integration the big topic at BMA show. B to B 93(10):43–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Madgett B, Engelbert N (2009) By the people, for the people, @the people: Web 2.0 in Government (Strategic Focus). Datamonitor Strategic Focus Report, March. http://s3.amazonaws.com/connected_republic/attachments/20/Data_Monitor_DMTC2279.pdf

  • Martin G, Reddington M, Kneafsey MB, Sloman M (2009) Scenarios and strategies for Web 2.0. Educ Train 51(5/6):370–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath AK, Singh R, Iyer L, Ganesh J (2010) Web 2.0: capabilities, business value and strategic practice. J Inf Sci Technol 7(1):22–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacio-Marques D, Saldana AZ, Vila JE (2013) What are the relationships among Web 2.0, market orientation and innovativeness? Kybernetes 42(5):754–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paroutis S, Saleh AA (2009) Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies. J Knowl Manag 13(4):52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruzic D, Andrlic B, Ruzic I (2011) Web 2.0 promotion techniques in hospitality industry. Int J Manag Cases 13(4):310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneckenberg D (2009) Web 2.0 and the empowerment of the knowledge worker. J Knowl Manag 13(6):509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segreto P (2010) Simplifying social media for optimum results. Franch World 42(8):12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma G, Baoku L (2013) Customer satisfaction in Web 2.0 and information technology development. Inform Technol People 26(4):347–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdes R, Phifer G, Murphy J, Knipp E, Smith DM, Cearley DW (2010) Hype cycle for web and user interaction technologies. Gartner, 23 July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OG, Mines C, Ashour M (2008) IT departments play key role in the acquisition and deployment of Web 2.0 technologies: how technology marketers can grow their business by appealing to IT. Forrester Research Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, 10 July 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Somnath Mitra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitra, S., Roy, S. (2016). Web 2.0 Technologies and Indian IT Service Companies: An Impact Analysis. In: Mandal, P., Vong, J. (eds) Smart Technologies for Smart Nations. Managing the Asian Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-585-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics