Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving Occupational Health of Indian Construction Workers: A Biomechanical Evaluation Approach

  • Chapter
Smart Technologies for Smart Nations

Part of the book series: Managing the Asian Century ((MAAC))

Abstract

An ergonomic study of manual material handling tasks in construction needs to address a number of manual material handling task-related problems such as pains in the back, shoulders and wrists, strain and sprain injuries, musculoskeletal disorders, severe fatigue and loss of energy of the workers and those acquired from improperly designed safety gadgets being used. Biomechanical modelling may help an analyst identify work system/manual material handling task-related factors and causes for such problems explicitly. In this paper, the details about the biomechanical modelling and analysis of a select manual material handling task at a construction site in India are presented. Based on a review of literature on available biomechanical modelling approaches, an appropriate biomechanical evaluation methodology is used for the select task. Results as obtained on the current status of occupational risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers engaged in the task indicate the need for potential ergonomic performance improvement of critical construction jobs for which compressive force at L5/S1 disc and other joints is beyond their threshold values. The major findings from the study with observations from a real construction site match closely with the opinion of the workers and are indicative of the validity of biomechanical evaluation methodology as proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ariel Dynamics (1994) Ariel performance analysis system manual. A software system for the biomechanical analysis of human motion. Ariel Dynamics, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Arjmand NA, Shirazi-Adl MP (2007) Trunk biomechanical models based on equilibrium at a single-level violate equilibrium at other levels. Eur Spine J 16:701–709

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoub MM, El-bassoussi MM (1978) Dynamic biomechanical model for sagittal lifting activities. In: CG Drury (ed) Safety in manual materials handling. Department of Health, Education and Welfare Publication No. NIOSH 78–185. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 88–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin DB (1969) A computerized biomechanical model: development and use in studying gross body actions. J Biomech 2:429–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin DB, Park KS (1973) A longitudinal study of low-back pain as associated with occupational weight lifting factors. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 34:513–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin DB, Freivalds A, Evans SM (1987) On the validity of an isometric biomechanical model of worker strengths. IIE Trans 19:280–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin DB, Andersson GBJ, Martin BJ (2006) Occupational biomechanics. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang YW, Hughes RE, Su FC, Itoi E, Nan K (2000) Prediction of muscle force involved in shoulder internal rotation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:188–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1994) White paper “European social policy – a way forward for the union”, COM(94) 333 final, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis D, St-Vincent M, Imbeau D, Jette C, Nastasia I (2008) Intervention practices in musculoskeletal disorders prevention: a critical literature review. Appl Ergon 39:1–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dysart MJ, Woldstad JC (1996) Posture prediction for static sagittal-plane lifting. J Biomech 29:1393–1397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El-Bassoussi MM (1974) A biomechanical dynamic model for lifting in the sagittal plane. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Technological University, Lubbock, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel VH, Nordin M (1980) Basic biomechanics of the skeletal system. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Freivalds A, Chaffin DB, Garg A, Lee KS (1984) A dynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum acceptable loads. J Biomech 17:251–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frigo C (1990) Three-dimensional model for studying the dynamic loads on the spine during lifting. Clin Biomech 5:143–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon M, Plamondon A, Gravel D (1993) Pivoting with the load, an alternative for protecting the back in asymmetric lifting. Spine 18:1515–1524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher S, Hamrick CA, Love AC, Marras WS (1994) Dynamic biomechanical modeling of symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks in restricted postures. Ergonomics 37:1289–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garg A, Chaffin DB (1975) A biomechanical computerized simulation of human strength. AIIE Transactions 7(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg A, Chaffin DB, Freivalds A (1982) Biomechanical stresses from manual load lifting. IIE Trans 14:272–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Genaidy AM, Asfour SS (1987) Review and evaluation of physiological cost prediction models for manual material handling. Hum Factors 29:465–476

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granata KP, Marras WS (1993) An EMG-assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions. J Biomech 26:1429–1438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatze H (1974) The meaning of the term ‘Biomechanics. J Biomech 7:189–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helander M (2006) A guide to the ergonomics of manufacturing. Taylor and Francis, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang SM, Chang CC, McGorry RW (1999) Development of a set of equations describing joint trajectories during para-sagittal lifting. J Biomech 32:871–876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kromodihardjo S, Mital A (1986) Kinetic analysis of manual lifting activities: Part I – development of a three-dimensional computer model. Int J Ind Ergon 1:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuorinka I, Forcier L (1995) Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs): a reference book for prevention. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson TJ, Field B (2002) The distribution of occupational injury risks in the Victorian construction industries. Saf Sci 40:439–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KS (1982) Biomechanical modelling of cart pushing and pulling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon CD, Winter DA (1993) Control of whole body balance in the frontal plane during human walking. J Biomech 26:633–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti R, Ray GG (2004) Determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift by adult female workers. Int J Ind Ergon 34:483–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marras WS, Sommerich CM (1991) A three-dimensional motion model of loads on the lumbar spine—I. Model structure. Hum Factors 33:123–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris JM, Lucas DB, Bresler B (1961) Role of the trunk in stability of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg 43-A:327–351

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity and low back. DHHS, NIOSH, Atlanta, pp 97–141

    Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) (1981) A work practices guide for manual lifting. Technical report No. 81–122. U.S. Department of health and human services (NIOSH), Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Okimoto MLLR, Teixeira ER (2009) Proposed procedures for measuring the lifting task variables required by the revised NIOSH lifting equation – a case study. Int J Ind Ergon 39:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parida R, Ray PK (2011) A comprehensive framework for physical evaluation of manual material handling tasks. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 24:153–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Potvin JR (1997) Use of NIOSH equation inputs to calculate lumbosacral compression forces. Ergonomics 40:691–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punnett L, Fine L, Keyserling W, Herrin G, Chaffin D (1991) Back disorders and non neutral trunk postures of automotive assembly workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 17:337–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rigen K, Seegal J (1995) Safety and health in construction industry. Annu Rev Public Health 16:165–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz AB, Andersson BJG (1981) Analysis of loads on the lumbar spine. Spine 6:76–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snook SH (1982) Low back pain in industry, symposium on idiopathic low back pain. In: White AA, Gordon SL (eds). Mosby Company, St. Louis, pp 23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Straker LM, Stevenson MG, Twomey T, Smith M (1997) A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination of manual handling tasks: 3. Biomech Meas Ergonom 40:708–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayyari F, Smith JL (1997) Occupational ergonomics: principles and applications. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank the management of the organization which supported the data collection at their construction site.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Construction Management and Research, Pune, 411045, India

    Ratri Parida

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 721302, India

    Sagar Sarkar

  3. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 721302, India

    Pradip Kumar Ray

Authors
  1. Ratri Parida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sagar Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pradip Kumar Ray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ratri Parida .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, USA

    Purnendu Mandal

  2. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    John Vong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parida, R., Sarkar, S., Ray, P.K. (2016). Improving Occupational Health of Indian Construction Workers: A Biomechanical Evaluation Approach. In: Mandal, P., Vong, J. (eds) Smart Technologies for Smart Nations. Managing the Asian Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-585-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation