Abstract
Many researchers raised the limitations of the applicability of motivational theories across cultures with the absolutist approach based on the individualistic perspective. This chapter gives a brief review of research adopting the relativist approach which is directed to universalist approach in studying motivational processes among Asian and Chinese students from the social-oriented perspective. Why would Asian Chinese and Chinese students on average show better academic performance but report more negative emotions and test anxiety than other ethnic groups and their Western counterparts? It is argued that the social-oriented achievement motivation (SOAM) model provides a theoretical framework in understanding and explaining the achievement patterns among Chinese students based on the meaning system approach. SOAM endorsement is linked to viewing academic achievement as an obligation to fulfill. The SOAM model depicts distinctive patterns of cognition (parental influences and achievement goals adoptions), affect (agitated emotions facing setbacks and test anxiety), behaviors (learning approaches and strategies, time and effort in studying), and academic outcomes (actual examination performance) in academic achievement settings among Chinese students (after controlling for individual-oriented achievement motivation, IOAM). The role of the SOAM system in broadening the understanding of basic human motivation (need for relatedness and autonomy) and learning motivation (intrinsic and extrinsic motivation) is also addressed and discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bao, X. H., & Lam, S.-f. (2008). Who makes the choice? Rethinking the role of autonomy and relatedness in Chinese children’s motivation. Child Development, 79, 269–283.
Bempechat, J., & Drago-Severson, E. (1999). Cross-national differences in academic achievement: Beyond etic conceptions of children’s understandings. Review of Educational Research, 69, 287–314.
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2010). Exploring Filipino adolescents’ perceptions of the legitimacy of parental authority over academic behaviors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 271–280.
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2012). Perceived legitimacy of parental control over academic behaviors and students’ academic adjustment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 557–571.
Biggs, J. B. (1992). Why and how do Hong Kong students learn? Using the learning and study process questionnaires (Education paper 14). Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong.
Chang, W. C., & Wong, K. (2008). Socially oriented achievement goals of Chinese university students in Singapore: Structure and relationships with achievement motives, goals and affective outcomes. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 880–885.
Chang, W. C., Wong, W. K., Teo, G., & Fam, A. (1997). Achievement motivation in Singapore: In search of a core construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 885–895.
Chang, W. C., Wong, W. K., & Teo, G. (2000). Individual-oriented and social-oriented achievement motivation of Singaporean Chinese. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 1, 39–63.
Chao, R. (1994). Beyond parental control & authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111–1119.
Chao, R. (1996). Chinese and European-American mothers’ beliefs about the role of parenting in children’s school success. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4, 403–423.
Chen, C., & Uttal, D. H. (1988). Cultural values, parents’ beliefs, and children’s achievement in the United States and China. Human Development, 31, 351–358.
Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Tong, J. Y., & Fu, J. H. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 923–940.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York City, NY: Psychology Press.
Eaton, M. J., & Dembo, M. H. (1997). Differences in the motivational beliefs of Asian American and non-Asian students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 433–440.
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475.
Hamilton, V. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., Akoh, H., & Miura, K. (1990). Credit and blame among American and Japanese children: Normative, cultural, and individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 442–451.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Carter, S. M., Lehto, A. T., & Elliot, A. J. (1997). Determinants and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1284–1295.
Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562–575.
Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., et al. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 599–615.
Hernandez, M., & Iyengar, S. S. (2001). What drives whom? A cultural perspective on human agency. Social Cognition, 19, 269–294.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.
Hong, Y., Chiu, C., & Kung, T. M. (1997). Bringing culture out in front: Effects of cultural meaning system activation on social cognition. In K. Leung, Y. Kashima, U. Kim, & S. Yamaguchi (Eds.), Progress in Asian social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 135–146). Singapore: Wiley.
Hong, Y. Y. (2001). Chinese students’ and teachers inferences of effort and ability. In F. Salili, C. Chiu, & Y. Hong (Eds.), Student motivation: The culture of context of learning. New York: Plenum.
Hong, Y. Y. (2009). A dynamic constructivist approach to culture: Moving from describing culture to explaining culture. In R. S. Wyer Jr., C. Chiu, & Y. Hong (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research and application (pp. 3–23). New York: Psychology Press.
Hong, Y. Y., & Chiu, C. (2001). Toward a paradigm shift: From cross-cultural differences in social cognition to social-cognitive mediation of cultural differences. Social Cognition, 19, 181–196.
Hong, Y. Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709–720.
Hui, E. K. P., Sun, R. C. F., Chow, S. S. Y., & Chu, M. H. T. (2011). Explaining Chinese students’ academic motivation: Filial piety and self-determination. Educational Psychology, 31, 377–392.
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. K. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.
King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). Studying for the sake of others: The role of social goals on academic engagement. Educational Psychology, 32, 749–776.
Lee, S. Y., Uttal, D. H., & Chen, C. (1995). Writing systems and reading achievement of Japanese, Chinese, and American first-grade Children. In I. Taylor & D. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabifies, and characters. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Lepper, M. R. (1981). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in children: Detrimental effects of superfluous social controls. In W. W. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lepper, M. R. (1983). Social-control processes and the internalization of social values: An attributional perspective. In E. T. Higgins, D. N. Ruble, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Social cognition and social development (pp. 294–330). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lepper, M. R., & Henderlong, J. (2000). “Extrinsic” versus “intrinsic” motivation reconsidered. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 257–310). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Liem, A. D., & Nie, Y. (2008). Values, achievement goals, and individually-oriented and social-oriented achievement motivations among Chinese and Indonesian secondary school students. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 898–903.
Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Porter, A., & Colmar, S. (2012). Sociocultural antecedents of achievement motivation and achievement: The role of values and achievement motives in achievement goals and academic performance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15(1), 1–13.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Mizokawa, D. T., & Ryckman, D. B. (1990). Attributions of academic success and failure: A comparison of six Asian-American ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 434–451.
Nie, Y., & Liem, A. (2013). Extending antecedents of achievement goals: The double-edged sword effect of social-oriented achievement motive and gender differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 249–255.
Oishi, S., & Sullivan, H. W. (2005). The mediating role of parental expectations in culture and well-being. Journal of Personality, 73, 1267–1294.
Pomerantz, E. M., & Wang, Q. (2009). The role of parents’ control in children’s development in Western and East Asian countries. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 285–289.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Sabini, J., & Monterosso, J. (2003). Moralization of college grading: Performance, effort, and moral worth. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 189–203.
Salili, F. (1994). Age, sex, and cultural differences in the meaning and dimensions of achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 635–648.
Salili, F. (1995). Explaining Chinese motivation and achievement. In M. L. Maer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. Culture, motivation and achievement (pp. 73–118). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (2000). Interest and self-regulation: The relation between having to and wanting to. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 341–372). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Shek, D. T. L., & Chan, L. K. (1999). Hong Kong Chinese parents’ perceptions of the ideal child. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 291–302.
Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., Chen, C., Stigler, J. W., Hsu, C., & Kitamura, S. (1990). Context of achievement: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 55(1-2, Serial No. 221), 1–119.
Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what can we learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.
Tao, V., & Hong, Y. (2000). A meaning system approach to Chinese students’ achievement goals. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 1, 13–38.
Tao, V. Y. K., & Hong, Y. Y. (2014). When academic achievement is an obligation: Perspectives from social-oriented achievement motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(1), 110–136.
Whang, P. A., & Hancock, G. R. (1994). Motivation and mathematics achievement: Comparison between Asian-American and non-Asian students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 302–322.
Weiner, B. (1993). On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist, 48, 957–965.
Weiner, B. (1994). Ability versus effort revisited: The moral determinants of achievement evaluation and achievement as a moral system. Educational Psychology, 29, 163–172.
Yang, K. S. (1982). Sinicization of psychological research in Chinese society: Directions and issues (in Chinese). In K. S. Yang & C. I. Wen (Eds.), The sinicization of social and behavioral science research in Chinese societies (pp. 153–187). Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.
Yang, K. S., & Yu, A. B. (1988, August). Social-oriented and individual-oriented achievement motives: Conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented at the symposium on Chinese personality and social psychology for the XXIVth International Congress of Psychology, Sydney, Australia.
Yeh, K. H., & Bedford, O. (2003). A test of dual filial piety model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 215–222.
Yu, A. B. (1996). Ultimate life concerns, self, and Chinese achievement motivation. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 227–246). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Yu, A. B., & Yang, K. S. (1987). Social-oriented and individual-oriented achievement motivation: A conceptual and empirical analysis (in Chinese). Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 64, 51–98. (Taiwan)
Yu, A. B., & Yang, K. S. (1994). The nature of achievement motivation in collectivist societies. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 239–250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yu, E. S. (1974). Achievement motive, familism, and Hsiao: A replication of McClelland-Winterbottom Studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Notre Dame.
Zusho, A., & Clayton, K. (2011). Culturalizing achievement goal theory and research. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 239–260.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tao, V.Y.K. (2016). Understanding Chinese Students’ Achievement Patterns: Perspectives from Social-Oriented Achievement Motivation. In: King, R., Bernardo, A. (eds) The Psychology of Asian Learners. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-575-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-576-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)