Abstract
This qualitative research study explores critical theory within the context of a university student labor union, the Student Labor Union (SLU)’s advocacy for the needs of its members. Through grounded theory methodology, interviews, and observations, this study examines how and why the SLU’s leading members lobby for the needs of fellow students. The construct of opposing forms of power, a modification of Freire’s (1970/2000) power construct, emerged from the interview and observation data and served as the conceptual framework for this study. This construct of opposing forms of power was exemplified through the three themes of tangible versus intangible power, conceptual versus empirical power, and deceptive versus honest power that emanated from the SLU’s leading members’ words and actions. It has implications for the study of critical literacy in that it illustrates how critical literacy is expressed through contrasting types of power in the language and activities of the labor union’s student leaders.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
On one hand, we’re supposed to be confronting the state and leading the workers, but on the other hand, when the workers say we’ve had enough, you know what, we’re going to remove our labor power, we’re going to cease working until we get higher pay, for example or whatever it is that the members of the union may want, now all of a sudden, we’re supposed to become the state and so we’re supposed to stand against the workers and say hey no guys, let’s just settle this through a contract. (Roxanna, December 13, 2013)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Schooling in capitalist America revisited. Sociology of Education, 75, 1–18.
Charmaz, K. (2011). A constructivist grounded theory analysis of losing and regaining a valued self. In F. J. Wertz, K. Charmaz, L. M. McMullen, R. Josselson, R. Anderson, & E. McSpadden (Eds.), Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry (pp. 165–204). New York: The Guilford Press.
Discenna, T. (2010). The rhetoric of graduate employee unionization: Critical rhetoric and the Yale grade strike. Communication Quarterly, 58(1), 19–35.
Fiksenbaum, L. M., Wickens, C. M., Greenglass, E. R., & Wiesenthal, D. L. (2012). Students’ perceptions of fairness following an academic strike. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 42(3), 24–44.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed: With an introduction by Donaldo Macedo. New York: Bloomsbury Academic (Original work published 1970).
Hodgkinson, H. (1970). Student protest-an institutional and national profile. The Record, 71(4), 537–548.
Janks, H. (2000). Domination, access, diversity and design: A synthesis for critical literacy education. Educational Review, 52(2), 175–186.
Janson, M. (2010). Joe Cytrynbaum: Labor leader. Perspectives on Urban Education, 7(2), 63–65.
Johnson, B., & McCarthy, T. (2000). Graduate student organizing at Yale and the future of the labor movement in higher education. Social Policy, 30(4), 11–18.
Julius, D. J. (2004). Will universities lock out students? Academe, 90(1), 34–36.
Julius, D. J., & Gumport, P. (2003). Graduate student unionization: Catalysts and consequences. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 187–216.
Lafer, G. (2003). Graduate student unions: Organizing in a changed academic economy. Labor Studies Journal, 28(2), 25–43.
Marx, K. (1967). Capital: A critique of political economy. New York: International Publishers.
Rhoades, G., & Rhoads, R. A. (2003). The public discourse of U.S. graduate employee unions: Social movement identities, ideologies, and strategies. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 163–186.
Rhoads, R. A., & Rhoades, G. (2005). Graduate employee unionization as symbol of and challenge to the corporatization of U.S. research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 76(3), 243–275.
Smallwood, S. (2001). Success and new hurdles for T.A. Unions. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, A10–A12.
Van Dyke, N., Dixon, M., & Carlon, H. (2007). Manufacturing dissent: Labor revitalization, Union Summer and student protest. Social Forces, 86(1), 193–214.
Vaughn, W. (1998). Apprentice or employee? Graduate students and their unions. Academe, 84(6), 43–49.
Zinni, D. M., Singh, P., & MacLennan, A. F. (2005). An exploratory study of graduate student unions in Canada. Industrial Relations, 60, 145–176.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharif, R. (2015). Opposing Forms of Power Through a University Student Labor Union’s Advocacy for Its Student Members. In: Yoon, B., Sharif, R. (eds) Critical Literacy Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-567-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-567-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-566-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-567-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)