Advertisement

Technology Management for New Product Development

  • Weiwei Wu
  • Yexin Liu
  • Bo Yu
Part of the Managing the Asian Century book series (MAAC)

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors explore the technology management capability (TMC) in new product development (NPD) of Chinese manufacturing firms from the perspective of knowledge. Firstly, insights from TMC and NPD literature are utilized, through which NPD and TMC are connected by knowledge. The effects of TMC and its elements in different NPD stages are then theoretically analyzed by taking knowledge issues as a bridge. Secondly, data of TMC and NPD are collected from Chinese manufacturing firms and analyzed by regression technique to verify the theoretical findings. Thirdly, a typical Chinese manufacturing firm is selected for further verifying the findings and illustrating their application. The results show that TMC has a significantly positive relationship with NPD performance: searching capability and selecting capability exert greater impacts on NPD performance in the idea development stage; implementation capability and learning capability exert greater impacts in technical implementation stage; and searching capability and learning capability exert greater impacts in commercialization stage. These findings not only benefit managers in China and the West by deepening their understanding of the mechanism of TMC affecting NPD, but also provide managers with a practical and effective tool of analyzing problems in NPD—NPD problem analysis sheet.

Keywords

Chinese manufacturing Technology management New product development Knowledge 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71472055, 71272175), National Science Foundation for Postdoctoral Scientists of China (201104424, 2012M520697), the Philosophy and Social Science Project of Heilongjiang Province (14B105), the Science Foundation for Young Scholars of Heilongjiang Province (QC2009C109), and the project sponsored by SRF for ROCS, SEM.

References

  1. Bowonder B, Miyake T (2000) Technology management: a knowledge ecology perspective [J]. Int J Technol Manag 19(7):663–684Google Scholar
  2. Cetindamar D, Phaal R, Probert D (2009) Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: a framework for technology management activities [J]. Technovation 29(4):237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cetindamar D, Phaal R, Probert D (2010) Technology management: activities and tools [M]. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  4. Cotec (1998) Temaguide: a guide to technology management and innovation for companies. Research report for innovation programme of European Communities, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  5. Díaz-Díaz NL, Aguiar-Díaz I, De Saá-Pérez P (2008) The effect of technological knowledge assets on performance: the innovative choice in Spanish firms [J]. Res Policy 7(9):1515–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ernst H, Hoyer WD, Rübsaamen C (2010) Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: implications for success [J]. J Mark 74(5):80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guan JC, Mok CK, Yam RCM, Chin KS, Pun KF (2006) Technology transfer and innovation performance: evidence from Chinese firms [J]. Technol Forecast Soc Change 73(6):666–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kerr C, Farrukh C, Phaal R et al (2013) Key principles for developing industrially relevant strategic technology management toolkits [J]. Technol Forecast Soc Change 80(6):1050–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim J, David W (2002) Focusing the fuzzy front-end in new product development [J]. R&D Manag 32(4):269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knudsen MP (2007) The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success [J]. J Prod Innov Manag 24(2):117–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Levin DZ, Barnard H (2008) Technology management routines that matter technology managers [J]. Int J Technol Manag 41(1):228–237Google Scholar
  12. Li L (2013) The path to Made-in-China: how this was done and future prospects [J]. Int J Technol Manag 146(1):4–13Google Scholar
  13. Mingers J, Brocklesby J (1997) Multimethodology: towards a framework for mixing methodologies [J]. Omega 25(5):489–509Google Scholar
  14. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory [M], 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Oerlemans LAG, Knoben J, Pretorius MW (2013) Alliance portfolio diversity, radical and incremental innovation: the moderating role of technology management [J]. Technovation 33(6):234–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pitt M, MacVaugh J (2008) Knowledge management for new product development [J]. J Knowl Manag 12(4):101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scott GM (2000) Critical technology management issues of new product development in high-tech companies [J]. J Prod Innov Manag 17(1):57–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sherman JD, Berkowitz D, Souder WE (2005) New product development performance and the interaction of cross-functional integration and knowledge management [J]. J Prod Innov Manag 22(5):399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Small A, Wainwright D (2014) SSM and technology management: developing multimethodology through practice [J]. Eur J Oper Res 233(3):660–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Song XM, Thieme RJ, Xie J (1998) The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: an exploratory study [J]. J Prod Innov Manag 15(4):289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [J]. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Todorova G, Durisin B (2007) Absorptive capacity: valuing a reconceptualization [J]. Acad Manage Rev 32(3):774–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance [J]. Acad Manage J 44(5):966–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu WW, Yu B, Wu C (2012) How China’s equipment manufacturing firms achieve successful independent innovation: the double helix mode of technological capability and technology management [J]. Chin Manag Stud 6(1):160–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K (2012) Internationalization and environmentally-related organizational learning among Chinese manufacturers [J]. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79(1):142–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations