Advertisement

Can Market Orientation Sustain Management of Microfinance Institutions? The Case Study of Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM)

  • Soheil Kazemian
  • Rashidah Abdul Rahman
  • Zuraidah Mohd Sanusi
  • Adewale Abideen Aedyemi
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This paper aims at providing insights into how the three dimensions of market orientation, namely, customer orientation, competitor orientation, and inter-function coordination, affect the management sustainability of Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM) as the largest microfinance institution in Southeast Asia. In a cross-sectional survey, Partial Least Squares (PLS) was used to test the hypotheses on a convenience sample of 67 % of AIM’s top management level. In addition, 400 customers and 300 employees from various branches based on their customers’ number were also chosen randomly. The results provided empirical evidences that indicate management sustainability is influenced by customer orientation and inter-function coordination significantly. In contrast, competitor orientation has insignificant effects on management sustainability of AIM. The result of the paper enhanced further the literature in understanding the long-term sustainable social performance-based market orientation.

Keywords

Market orientation Customer orientation Competitor orientation Inter-function coordination Management sustainability 

References

  1. Ahmad I (2003) Current situation of microfinance in Malaysia and its issues. Agriculture Bank of Malaysia, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong S, Collopy F (1996) Competitor orientation: effects of objectives and information on managerial decisions and profitability. J Mark Res 33(2):385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhuian SN, Habib M (2005) The relationship between entrepreneurship, market orientation and performance: a test in Saudi Arabia. J Transl Manag 10(1):79–98Google Scholar
  4. Bank Negara Malaysia (2011) The annual report. Retrieved on Aug2013 from: http://www.bnm.gov.my/index.php?ch=en_publication_catalogue&pg=en_publication_bnmar&ac=89&yr=2011
  5. Chamhuri S, Quinones B (2000) Microfinance in Malaysia: aiming at success. Microfinance and poverty alleviation: 180–199Google Scholar
  6. Cheney H, Nheu N, Vecellio L (2004) Sustainability as social change: values and power in sustainability discourse. Sustainability and social science: Roundtable proceedings: 225–246Google Scholar
  7. Crittenden VL, Crittenden WF, Ferrell LK, Ferrell O, Pinney CC (2011) Market-oriented sustainability: a conceptual framework and propositions. J Acad Mark Sci 39(1):71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deshpandé R, Farley JU (1998) Measuring market orientation: generalization and synthesis. J Mark Focus Manag 2(3):213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fontaine C, Haarman A, Schmid S (2006) The Stakeholder Theory. dalam http://www.edalys.fr/documents/Stakeholders%20theory.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2011
  10. Frambach RT, Prabhu J, Verhallen TM (2003) The influence of business strategy on new product activity: the role of market orientation. Int j res mark 20(4):377–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeman RE, Wicks AC, Parmar B (2004) Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organ Sci 15(3):364–369Google Scholar
  12. Ghani U, Mahmood Z (2011) Factors influencing performance of microfinance firms in Pakistan: focus on market orientation. Int J Acad Res 3(5):125–132Google Scholar
  13. Gresham G, Hafer J, Markowski E (2006) Inter-functional market orientation between marketing departments and technical departments in the management of the new product development. Process J Behav Appl Manage 8(1):43–65Google Scholar
  14. Grinstein A (2008) The effect of market orientation and its components on innovation consequences: a meta-analysis. J Acad Mark Sci 36(2):166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract 19(2):139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Mark Sci 40(3):414–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Im S, Workman JP Jr (2004) Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. J Mark 68:114–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Israel GD (1992) Determining sample size: University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDISGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaworski B, Kohli A (1993) Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J Mark 57:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kohli AK, Jaworski BJ (1990) Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J Mark 54:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li PJ, Rouyih H (2007) Microfinance In Malaysia. In: Mun HW (ed) Malaysian economic development issues and debates. Malaysian Economics Development, Malaysia, pp 133–143Google Scholar
  22. Matsuno K, Mentzer JT (2000) The effects of strategy type on the market orientation-performance relationship. J Mark 64(4):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGuire PB, Conroy JD, Thapa GB (1998) Getting the framework right: policy and regulation for microfinance in Asia: Foundation for Development Cooperation BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  24. Megicks P, Mishra A, Lean J (2005) Enhancing microfinance outreach through market-oriented new service development in Indian regional rural banks. Int J Bank Mark 23(1):107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mersland R, Øystein Strøm R (2009) Performance and governance in microfinance institutions. J Bank Financ 33(4):662–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Narver JC, Slater SF (1990) The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. J Mark 54:20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ngai JCH, Ellis P (1998) Market orientation and business performance: some evidence from Hong Kong. Int Mark Rev 15(2):119–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ngansathil W (2001) Market orientation and business performance: empirical evidence from Thailand. The University of MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  29. Nunnally J (1978) Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Cass A, Ngo LV (2007) Market orientation versus innovative culture: two routes to superior brand performance. Eur J Mark 41(7/8):868–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Outlook WE (2012) Malaysia – Real GDP growth: World Data Atlas. http://knoema.com/atlas/Malaysia/GDP-growth
  32. Pelham AM, Wilson DT (1995) A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance. J Acad Mark Sci 24(1):27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Qayyum A, Ahmad M (2006) Efficiency and sustainability of Micro Finance Institutions in South Asia. South Asian Network of Economic Research Institutes (SANEI)Google Scholar
  34. Ramli M (2001) Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia: the Oldest GB Replication. Source: http://www.grameen-info.org/dialogue/dialogue47/crMalaysia.html. Accessed 21 Sept 2013
  35. Reichheld FF, Sasser WE (1990) Zero defections: quality comes to services. Harv Bus Rev 68(5):105–111Google Scholar
  36. Ruekert RW (1992) Developing a market orientation: an organizational strategy perspective. Int j res mark 9(3):225–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sebhatu SP (2009) Sustainability performance measurement for sustainable organizations: beyond compliance and reporting. Karlstad University, KarlstadGoogle Scholar
  38. Singh S, Ranchhod A (2004) Market orientation and customer satisfaction: evidence from British machine tool industry. Ind Mark Manag 33(2):135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. SME (2011) SME annual report. In: D. SME (ed) Census 2011Google Scholar
  40. Szymanski DM, Henard DH (2001) Customer satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. J Acad Mark Sci 29(1):16–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. The World Bank (2012) Poverty and inequality statistics. World Data Atlas. http://knoema.com/atlas/Malaysia/Poverty-level (Vol Mar 12)
  42. Tortosa V, Moliner MA, Sánchez J (2009) Internal market orientation and its influence on organisational performance. Eur J Mark 43(11/12):1435–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soheil Kazemian
    • 1
  • Rashidah Abdul Rahman
    • 2
  • Zuraidah Mohd Sanusi
    • 1
  • Adewale Abideen Aedyemi
    • 3
  1. 1.Accounting Research Institute (ARI)Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM)Shah AlamMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and AdministrationKing Abdul Aziz University (KAU)JeddahKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  3. 3.Accounting Research Institute (ARI)International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)GombakMalaysia

Personalised recommendations