Skip to main content

Developing and Evaluating Design Thinking

  • Chapter
Design Thinking for Education

Abstract

This chapter examines the different conceptions of design knowledge and suggests how it can be fostered and evaluated in the educational experiences of teachers and students. It proposes that design thinking can be developed through the purposive selection and sequencing of design problems as well as through the reflection and understanding of design reasoning. These processes can also support the long-term development of the desired dispositions to engage in design work. The development of design thinking can also be supported through a multi-prong approach where design perceptions, design processes, and design outcomes are being evaluated. The issues and challenges involved are then discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rutowski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Hernandez Van-Nest, M., … Sutton, J. (2003). Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L. (2006). Picture this: My Lesson. How LAMS is being used with pre-service teachers to develop effective classroom activities. Paper presented at the The First International LAMS conference: Designing the future of learning, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmel-Gilfilen, C., & Portillo, M. (2010). Developmental trajectories in design thinking: An examination of criteria. Design Studies, 31(1), 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, P. F. (2001). Anticipatory reflection while learning to teach: From a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed model of reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking. New York, NY: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, K., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2004). Levels of expertise in design education. In DS 33: Proceedings of E&PDE 2004, the 7th international conference on engineering and product design education, Delft, the Netherlands, 02.-03.09. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. S., Botturi, L., Boot, E., & Nelson, J. (2008). Design languages. In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 633–645). New York, NY: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G. (1995). The designer as a team of one. Design Studies, 16(2), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G., & Weil, M. (1998). Contents and structure in design reasoning. Design Issues, 14(3), 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for learning (6th ed., pp. 7–92). Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C.-H. (2001). Some phenomena of problem decomposition strategy for design thinking: Differences between novices and experts. Design Studies, 22(1), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoadley, C., & Cox, C. (2009). What is design knowledge and how do we teach it. In C. DiGiano, S. Goldman, & M. Chorost (Eds.), Educating learning technology designers: Guiding and inspiring creators of innovative educational tools (pp. 19–35). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, J. W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2008). Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing. Design Studies, 29(4), 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2005). Can entropy indicate the richness of idea generation in team designing. CAADRIA, 5(1), 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric to analyze teachers’ conceptions of meaningful learning in ICT lesson planning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lee, K. S. (2013). Design opportunities and their impact pre-service teachers’ perception of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Global Chinese Journal of Computers in Education, 10(1), 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-Developing Instructional Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (in press). A survey to examine teachers’ perceptions of Design Dispositions, Lesson Design Practices and their relationships with Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: The design process demystified. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P., & Scott, P. (1994). Discovering the design problem. Design Studies, 15(2), 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcos, J. M., Sanchez, E., & Tillema, H. H. (2011). Promoting teacher reflection: What is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., & Dalziel, J. (2006). Patterns, designs and activities: Unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2), 216–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michlewski, K. (2008). Uncovering design attitude: Inside the culture of designers. Organization Studies, 29(3), 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, R. (1999). Educating the designerly thinker. Design Studies, 20(2), 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. (1968). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, N., & Magliaro, S. (2001). A reflexive model for teaching instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J., Clark, R. E., & De Croock, M. B. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa, N. (2011). Teachers’ educational design as a process of reflection‐in‐action: The lessons we can learn from Donald Schön’s the reflective practitioner when studying the professional practice of teachers as educational designers. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(1), 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koh, J.H.L., Chai, C.S., Wong, B., Hong, HY. (2015). Developing and Evaluating Design Thinking. In: Design Thinking for Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-444-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics