Abstract
This chapter examines the different conceptions of design knowledge and suggests how it can be fostered and evaluated in the educational experiences of teachers and students. It proposes that design thinking can be developed through the purposive selection and sequencing of design problems as well as through the reflection and understanding of design reasoning. These processes can also support the long-term development of the desired dispositions to engage in design work. The development of design thinking can also be supported through a multi-prong approach where design perceptions, design processes, and design outcomes are being evaluated. The issues and challenges involved are then discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1–11.
Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168.
Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 32–42.
Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rutowski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Hernandez Van-Nest, M., … Sutton, J. (2003). Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 57–72.
Cameron, L. (2006). Picture this: My Lesson. How LAMS is being used with pre-service teachers to develop effective classroom activities. Paper presented at the The First International LAMS conference: Designing the future of learning, Sydney.
Carmel-Gilfilen, C., & Portillo, M. (2010). Developmental trajectories in design thinking: An examination of criteria. Design Studies, 31(1), 74–91.
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27.
Conway, P. F. (2001). Anticipatory reflection while learning to teach: From a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed model of reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 89–106.
Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441.
Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking. New York, NY: Berg.
Dorst, K., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2004). Levels of expertise in design education. In DS 33: Proceedings of E&PDE 2004, the 7th international conference on engineering and product design education, Delft, the Netherlands, 02.-03.09. 2004.
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
Gibbons, A. S., Botturi, L., Boot, E., & Nelson, J. (2008). Design languages. In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 633–645). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
Goldschmidt, G. (1995). The designer as a team of one. Design Studies, 16(2), 189–209.
Goldschmidt, G., & Weil, M. (1998). Contents and structure in design reasoning. Design Issues, 14(3), 85–100.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for learning (6th ed., pp. 7–92). Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.
Ho, C.-H. (2001). Some phenomena of problem decomposition strategy for design thinking: Differences between novices and experts. Design Studies, 22(1), 27–45.
Hoadley, C., & Cox, C. (2009). What is design knowledge and how do we teach it. In C. DiGiano, S. Goldman, & M. Chorost (Eds.), Educating learning technology designers: Guiding and inspiring creators of innovative educational tools (pp. 19–35). New York, NY: Routledge.
Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553–564.
Kan, J. W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2008). Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing. Design Studies, 29(4), 315–337.
Kan, W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2005). Can entropy indicate the richness of idea generation in team designing. CAADRIA, 5(1), 451–457.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.
Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric to analyze teachers’ conceptions of meaningful learning in ICT lesson planning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887–900.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lee, K. S. (2013). Design opportunities and their impact pre-service teachers’ perception of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Global Chinese Journal of Computers in Education, 10(1), 20–35.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 1–10.
Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-Developing Instructional Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35–58.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (in press). A survey to examine teachers’ perceptions of Design Dispositions, Lesson Design Practices and their relationships with Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education.
Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: The design process demystified. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
Lloyd, P., & Scott, P. (1994). Discovering the design problem. Design Studies, 15(2), 125–140.
Marcos, J. M., Sanchez, E., & Tillema, H. H. (2011). Promoting teacher reflection: What is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 21–36.
McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., & Dalziel, J. (2006). Patterns, designs and activities: Unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2), 216–242.
Michlewski, K. (2008). Uncovering design attitude: Inside the culture of designers. Organization Studies, 29(3), 373–392.
Oxman, R. (1999). Educating the designerly thinker. Design Studies, 20(2), 105–122.
Perry, W. G. (1968). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Shambaugh, N., & Magliaro, S. (2001). A reflexive model for teaching instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 69–92.
Van Merriënboer, J. J., Clark, R. E., & De Croock, M. B. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39–61.
Wieringa, N. (2011). Teachers’ educational design as a process of reflection‐in‐action: The lessons we can learn from Donald Schön’s the reflective practitioner when studying the professional practice of teachers as educational designers. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(1), 167–174.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koh, J.H.L., Chai, C.S., Wong, B., Hong, HY. (2015). Developing and Evaluating Design Thinking. In: Design Thinking for Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-444-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-444-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-443-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-444-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)