Advertisement

The End of the Beginning: An Epilogue

  • Punya Mishra
  • Danah Henriksen

Abstract

This final chapter serves as the epilogue, as both a summary and a synthesis of the chapters in the book. We begin by providing an informal historical overview of the current impact of TPACK as a theoretical framework in terms of the quantifiable reach of the theory as well as the rapidity and breadth of its acceptance. We then provide an overview of each chapter that includes, first, how they are grouped thematically and, then, its core ideas. For Chaps.  2,  3,  4,  5,  6, and  7, we identify and summarize a few key takeaways and points of interest. Following this overview, we identify three crosscutting themes: the importance of the idea of learning by design for the development of TPACK; an emphasis on the evaluation and measurement of TPACK; and, finally, the important role that communities of practice play in TPACK development. We note how learning by design is relevant because several of the studies here involved educators working through the design process (creating software applications, lessons, and other teaching artifacts) to extend it into the arena of TPACK research. Evaluation/measurement is important as well because the work in this book seek to develop rubrics that would allow teacher educators to evaluate different facets of TPACK. Communities of practice were also relevant because, rather than looking at teachers in isolation, the work in this book represents settings that support partnership/teamwork between preservice and in-service teachers (as well as educational researchers, teacher educators, and others). Finally, after considering these points, we offer a note of both positive points and constructive critique regarding this book’s potential contributions to the internationalization of TPACK research.

Keywords

Teacher Educator Preservice Teacher Educational Technology Future Teacher Teacher Professional Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education Committee on Innovation and Technology, Herry, M., Mishra, P., & Koehle, M. J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bashar, M. I., & Khan, H. (2007). E-Learning in Singapore: A brief assessment (U21Global Working Paper Series, No. 003/2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1601611 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1601611
  3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/abstract.php?art_id=1349
  5. Granger, C. A., Morbey, M. L., Lotherington, H., Owston, R. D., & Wideman, H. H. (2002). Factors contributing to teachers’ successful implementation of IT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4), 480–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children’s learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mishra, P., Henriksen, D., & Deep-Play Research Group. (2013). A NEW approach to defining and measuring creativity. Tech Trends, 57(5), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Zhao, Y. (Eds.). (2007). Faculty development by design: Integrating technology in higher education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  11. Peppler, K., & Kafai, Y. B. (2010). Gaming fluencies: Pathways into a participatory culture in a community design studio. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(4), 1–14.Google Scholar
  12. Qi, J. J. (2005). The gap between e-learning availability and e-learning industry development in Taiwan. In A. A. Carr-Chellman (Ed.), Global perspectives on e-learning: Rhetoric and reality (pp. 35–51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shaltry, C., Henriksen, D., Wu, M. L., & Dickson, P. (2013). Teaching pre-service teachers to integrate technology: Situated learning with online portfolios, classroom websites and Facebook. TechTrends, 57(3), 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology and Special EducationMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations